Literature DB >> 28564436

RESISTANCE OF GENETIC CORRELATION STRUCTURE TO DIRECTIONAL SELECTION IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Gerald S Wilkinson1, Kevin Fowler2, Linda Partridge2.   

Abstract

The genetic covariance and correlation matrices for five morphological traits were estimated from four populations of fruit flies, Drosophila melanogaster, to measure the extent of change in genetic covariances as a result of directional selection. Two of the populations were derived from lines that had undergone selection for large or small thorax length over the preceding 23 generations. A third population was constituted using flies from control lines that were maintained with equivalent population sizes as the selected lines. The fourth population contained flies from the original cage population from which the selected and control lines had been started. Tests of the homogeneity of covariance matrices using maximum likelihood techniques revealed significant changes in covariance structure among the selected lines. Prediction of base population trait means from selected line means under the assumption of constant genetic covariances indicated that genetic covariances for the small population differed more from the base population than did the covariances for the large population. The predicted small population means diverged farther from the expected means because the additive genetic variance associated with several traits increased in value and most of the genetic covariances associated with one trait changed in sign. These results illustrate that genetic covariances may remain nearly constant in some situations while changing markedly in others. Possible developmental reasons for the genetic changes are discussed. © 1990 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Year:  1990        PMID: 28564436     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb04305.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  10 in total

1.  Modularity, individuality, and evo-devo in butterfly wings.

Authors:  Patricia Beldade; Kees Koops; Paul M Brakefield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Genetic correlations: transient truths of adaptive evolution.

Authors:  N G Prasad; Mallikarjun N Shakarad
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.166

3.  Directional Selection Rather Than Functional Constraints Can Shape the G Matrix in Rapidly Adapting Asexuals.

Authors:  Kevin Gomez; Jason Bertram; Joanna Masel
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Directional selection effects on patterns of phenotypic (co)variation in wild populations.

Authors:  A P A Assis; J L Patton; A Hubbe; G Marroig
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  A positive genetic correlation between hypoxia tolerance and heat tolerance supports a controversial theory of heat stress.

Authors:  Collin Teague; Jacob P Youngblood; Kinley Ragan; Michael J Angilletta; John M VandenBrooks
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  The devil in the details of life-history evolution: instability and reversal of genetic correlations during selection on Drosophila development.

Authors:  Adam K Chippindale; Anh L Ngo; Michael R Rose
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.166

7.  Physiological genetics of the response to a high-sucrose diet by Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  L Wang; A G Clark
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 1.890

8.  The evolution of phenotypic integration: How directional selection reshapes covariation in mice.

Authors:  Anna Penna; Diogo Melo; Sandra Bernardi; Maria Inés Oyarzabal; Gabriel Marroig
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Quantitative genetics of wing morphology in the parasitoid wasp Nasonia vitripennis: hosts increase sibling similarity.

Authors:  Shuwen Xia; Bart A Pannebakker; Martien A M Groenen; Bas J Zwaan; Piter Bijma
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Fitness variation in response to artificial selection for reduced cell area, cell number and wing area in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Vincenzo Trotta; Federico C F Calboli; Marcello Ziosi; Sandro Cavicchi
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 3.260

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.