Literature DB >> 7575391

Physiological genetics of the response to a high-sucrose diet by Drosophila melanogaster.

L Wang1, A G Clark.   

Abstract

A diet medium containing 10% (w/v) sucrose can be inferred to be stressful to Drosophila melanogaster from the increased developmental time and reduced size and fecundity of emerging flies. The metabolic basis for this stress and the genetic response to it are of interest from the point of view of both metabolic regulation and the evolutionary genetics of adaptation to stress. Here the effects of a high-sucrose diet on live weight, total protein, stored lipid and glycogen, and crude activities of 12 enzymes involved in energy metabolism were quantified. Assays were done on a large population of Drosophila that had been acclimated to the laboratory. A collection of eggs was divided to produce two replicate populations maintained on standard medium and two replicates maintained on high-sucrose medium for 133 generations. At the end of this period, both control and sucrose-selected populations were tested on standard and on high-sucrose medium. Results showed that the immediate effect of the high-sucrose diet (compared to standard medium) for both populations was a reduction in live weight and total protein, and activities of many of the enzymes were also reduced by the sucrose treatment, even after adjusting for the weight effect. Selection resulted in several changes on both the standard and the sucrose medium, but the direction of change was not always the same as the acute effect. In no case was there a significant medium by selection-treatment interaction. The pattern of phenotypic correlations did not resolve the reasons for the direction of the genetic responses. Correlations were generally stable across diets and after selection, but there were notable exceptions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7575391     DOI: 10.1007/BF00554727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Genet        ISSN: 0006-2928            Impact factor:   1.890


  16 in total

1.  Nutritional control of xanthine dehydrogenase. I. The effect in adult Drosophila melanogaster of feeding a high protein diet to larvae.

Authors:  J F Collins; E J Duke; E Glassman
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1970-05-12

Review 2.  The biological basis of ethanol tolerance in Drosophila.

Authors:  B W Geer; P W Heinstra; S W McKechnie
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol B       Date:  1993-06

3.  Genetic variation in the dietary sucrose modulation of enzyme activities in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  B W Geer; C C Laurie-Ahlberg
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  The ecological genetics of growth in Drosophila. 8. Adaptation to a new diet.

Authors:  F W Robertson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-10       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  Ethanol tolerances of Drosophila melanogaster populations selected on different concentrations of ethanol supplemented media.

Authors:  J G Oakeshott; F M Cohan; J B Gibson
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  COMPARATIVE EVOLUTIONARY ANALYSIS OF METABOLISM IN NINE DROSOPHILA SPECIES.

Authors:  Andrew G Clark; Lei Wang
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  RESISTANCE OF GENETIC CORRELATION STRUCTURE TO DIRECTIONAL SELECTION IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Authors:  Gerald S Wilkinson; Kevin Fowler; Linda Partridge
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Carbohydrate utilization by rainbow trout is affected by feeding strategy.

Authors:  S S Hung; T Storebakken
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.798

9.  Regulation of amylase activity in drosophila melanogaster: effects of dietary carbohydrate.

Authors:  D A Hickey; B Benkel
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 1.890

10.  Induction of alcohol dehydrogenase by ethanol in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  B W Geer; S W McKechnie; M M Bentley; J G Oakeshott; E M Quinn; M L Langevin
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 4.798

View more
  5 in total

1.  Genotype-by-diet interactions drive metabolic phenotype variation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Laura K Reed; Stephanie Williams; Mastafa Springston; Julie Brown; Kenda Freeman; Christie E DesRoches; Marla B Sokolowski; Greg Gibson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Inbreeding depression across a nutritional stress continuum.

Authors:  M F Schou; V Loeschcke; T N Kristensen
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Similar effects of high-fructose and high-glucose feeding in a Drosophila model of obesity and diabetes.

Authors:  Laura Palanker Musselman; Jill L Fink; Thomas J Baranski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Protein Kinase D Is Dispensable for Development and Survival of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Dieter Maier; Anja C Nagel; Alexandra Kelp; Anette Preiss
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.154

5.  Experimental evidence for nutrition regulated stress resistance in Drosophila ananassae.

Authors:  Seema Sisodia; Bashisth N Singh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.