Literature DB >> 28564309

EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF COMMUNITY EVOLUTION I: THE RESPONSE TO SELECTION AT THE COMMUNITY LEVEL.

Charles J Goodnight1.   

Abstract

Coevolution generally refers to the process of two or more organisms adapting to each other as a result of individual selection. Another possibility, however, is that coevolution may result from selection acting directly at the community level. Certain types of multispecies associations, such as lichens, which are a symbiotic association between an alga and a fungus, are examples of simple two species communities that may be units of selection. The study presented here uses two species communities of Tribolium castaneum and T. confusum in an investigation of selection acting at the community level. Selection at the community level is performed on one trait measured in one species and correlated responses in other traits measured both within species and among species are monitored. I demonstrate that community selection, defined as the differential survival and or reproduction of communities, can result in significant changes in the phenotype of a community. The observed changes in the phenotype of a community as a result of community selection included changes in the trait under selection (direct effects of selection), as well as changes in traits that are not under selection (correlated responses to selection). Furthermore, two types of correlated responses to selection were observed. The first, within-species correlated responses to selection, are changes in a trait measured in one species as a result of community selection acting on another trait measured in the same species. The second, between-species correlated responses to selection, are changes in a trait measured in one species as a result of community selection acting on a trait measured in another species. Between species correlated responses to selection are of particular interest because they cannot be mediated by pathways of gene action that are internal to an individual, rather they can be mediated only through ecological pathways. In other words, between-species correlated responses to selection suggest that genetically based interactions among individuals are contributing to the response to community selection. These among species ecological pathways of gene action cannot contribute to a response to selection at a lower level; thus community selection may be able to bring about a response to selection that is qualitatively different from the response selection that would occur as a result of selection acting at a lower level. © 1990 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Year:  1990        PMID: 28564309     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb03850.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  12 in total

1.  Simulations reveal challenges to artificial community selection and possible strategies for success.

Authors:  Li Xie; Alex E Yuan; Wenying Shou
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 8.029

2.  Artificial selection of simulated microbial ecosystems.

Authors:  Hywel T P Williams; Timothy M Lenton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Evolution in metacommunities.

Authors:  Charles J Goodnight
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Artificially selecting bacterial communities using propagule strategies.

Authors:  Chang-Yu Chang; Melisa L Osborne; Djordje Bajic; Alvaro Sanchez
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 5.  Intra-locus sexual conflict and sexually antagonistic genetic variation in hermaphroditic animals.

Authors:  Jessica K Abbott
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Directed Evolution of Microbial Communities.

Authors:  Álvaro Sánchez; Jean C C Vila; Chang-Yu Chang; Juan Diaz-Colunga; Sylvie Estrela; María Rebolleda-Gomez
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 12.981

7.  Engineering complex communities by directed evolution.

Authors:  Chang-Yu Chang; Jean C C Vila; Madeline Bender; Richard Li; Madeleine C Mankowski; Molly Bassette; Julia Borden; Stefan Golfier; Paul Gerald L Sanchez; Rachel Waymack; Xinwen Zhu; Juan Diaz-Colunga; Sylvie Estrela; Maria Rebolleda-Gomez; Alvaro Sanchez
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 15.460

8.  Steering ecological-evolutionary dynamics to improve artificial selection of microbial communities.

Authors:  Li Xie; Wenying Shou
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  The evolution of mutualism with modifiers.

Authors:  Christopher G Quickfall; James A R Marshall
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  The March of the Beetles: Epistatic Components Dominate Divergence in Dispersal Tendency in Tribolium castaneum.

Authors:  Sarah N Ruckman; Heath Blackmon
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 2.645

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.