Literature DB >> 20719776

Intra-locus sexual conflict and sexually antagonistic genetic variation in hermaphroditic animals.

Jessica K Abbott1.   

Abstract

Intra-locus sexual conflict results when sex-specific selection pressures for a given trait act against the intra-sexual genetic correlation for that trait. It has been found in a wide variety of taxa in both laboratory and natural populations, but the importance of intra-locus sexual conflict and sexually antagonistic genetic variation in hermaphroditic organisms has rarely been considered. This is not so surprising given the conceptual and theoretical association of intra-locus sexual conflict with sexual dimorphism, but there is no a priori reason why intra-locus sexual conflict cannot occur in hermaphroditic organisms as well. Here, I discuss the potential for intra-locus sexual conflict in hermaphroditic animals and review the available evidence for such conflict, and for the existence of sexually antagonistic genetic variation in hermaphrodites. I argue that mutations with asymmetric effects are particularly likely to be important in mediating sexual antagonism in hermaphroditic organisms. Moreover, sexually antagonistic genetic variation is likely to play an important role in inter-individual variation in sex allocation and in transitions to and from gonochorism (separate sexes) in simultaneous hermaphrodites. I also describe how sequential hermaphrodites may experience a unique form of intra-locus sexual conflict via antagonistic pleiotropy. Finally, I conclude with some suggestions for further research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20719776      PMCID: PMC3013399          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  56 in total

Review 1.  "Allohormones": a class of bioactive substances favoured by sexual selection.

Authors:  J M Koene; A ter Maat
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Quantitative genetic tests of recent senescence theory: age-specific mortality and male fertility in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M S Snoke; D E L Promislow
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Female mating bias results in conflicting sex-specific offspring fitness.

Authors:  Kenneth M Fedorka; Timothy A Mousseau
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-05-06       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Within-clutch variation in offspring sex determined by differences in sire body size: cryptic mate choice in the wild.

Authors:  Ryan Calsbeek; Barry Sinervo
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.411

5.  Genetic constraints on floral evolution in a sexually dimorphic plant revealed by artificial selection.

Authors:  Lynda F Delph; Janet L Gehring; Frank M Frey; A Michele Arntz; Maureen Levri
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Sexually antagonistic genes: experimental evidence.

Authors:  W R Rice
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-06-05       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Steps in the evolution of heteromorphic sex chromosomes.

Authors:  D Charlesworth; B Charlesworth; G Marais
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Female polymorphism, frequency dependence, and rapid evolutionary dynamics in natural populations.

Authors:  Erik I Svensson; Jessica Abbott; Roger Hardling
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-03-14       Impact factor: 3.926

9.  Trade-off between male and female allocation in the simultaneously hermaphroditic flatworm Macrostomum sp.

Authors:  L Schärer; P Sandner; N K Michiels
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.411

10.  Simultaneous hermaphroditism and sexual selection.

Authors:  E L Charnov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  18 in total

1.  Evolutionary inevitability of sexual antagonism.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Do traits separated by metamorphosis evolve independently? Concepts and methods.

Authors:  Julie Collet; Simon Fellous
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Sex allocation and investment into pre- and post-copulatory traits in simultaneous hermaphrodites: the role of polyandry and local sperm competition.

Authors:  Lukas Schärer; Ido Pen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Sexually antagonistic polymorphism in simultaneous hermaphrodites.

Authors:  Crispin Y Jordan; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 5.  Sexual conflict in hermaphrodites.

Authors:  Lukas Schärer; Tim Janicke; Steven A Ramm
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 10.005

6.  The interaction between sex-specific selection and local adaptation in species without separate sexes.

Authors:  Colin Olito; Jessica K Abbott; Crispin Y Jordan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Female fitness optimum at intermediate mating rates under traumatic mating.

Authors:  Rolanda Lange; Tobias Gerlach; Joscha Beninde; Johanna Werminghausen; Verena Reichel; Nils Anthes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Using theories of sexual selection and sexual conflict to improve our understanding of plant ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Åsa Lankinen; Kristina Karlsson Green
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 3.276

9.  Two sexes, one genome: the evolutionary dynamics of intralocus sexual conflict.

Authors:  Tanya M Pennell; Edward H Morrow
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Epigenetics and sex-specific fitness: an experimental test using male-limited evolution in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Jessica K Abbott; Paolo Innocenti; Adam K Chippindale; Edward H Morrow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.