Literature DB >> 32888315

Artificially selecting bacterial communities using propagule strategies.

Chang-Yu Chang1,2, Melisa L Osborne3,4, Djordje Bajic1,2, Alvaro Sanchez1,2,3.   

Abstract

Artificial selection is a promising approach to manipulate microbial communities. Here, we report the outcome of two artificial selection experiments at the microbial community level. Both used "propagule" selection strategies, whereby the best-performing communities are used as the inocula to form a new generation of communities. Both experiments were contrasted to a random selection control. The first experiment used a defined set of strains as the starting inoculum, and the function under selection was the amylolytic activity of the consortia. The second experiment used multiple soil communities as the starting inocula, and the function under selection was the communities' cross-feeding potential. In both experiments, the selected communities reached a higher mean function than the control. In the first experiment, this was caused by a decline in function of the control, rather than an improvement of the selected line. In the second experiment, this response was fueled by the large initial variance in function across communities, and stopped when the top-performing community "fixed" in the metacommunity. Our results are in agreement with basic expectations from breeding theory, pointing to some of the limitations of community-level selection experiments that can inform the design of future studies.
© 2020 The Authors. Evolution © 2020 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial selection; community functions; microbial communities; propagule strategy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32888315      PMCID: PMC7942404          DOI: 10.1111/evo.14092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  62 in total

1.  Artificial selection of microbial ecosystems for 3-chloroaniline biodegradation.

Authors:  W Swenson; J Arendt; D S Wilson
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.491

Review 2.  Social evolution theory for microorganisms.

Authors:  Stuart A West; Ashleigh S Griffin; Andy Gardner; Stephen P Diggle
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 60.633

3.  Evolutionary games and population dynamics: maintenance of cooperation in public goods games.

Authors:  Christoph Hauert; Miranda Holmes; Michael Doebeli
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Simulations reveal challenges to artificial community selection and possible strategies for success.

Authors:  Li Xie; Alex E Yuan; Wenying Shou
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 5.  Evolution in metacommunities.

Authors:  Charles J Goodnight
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Group selections among laboratory populations of Tribolium.

Authors:  M J Wade
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Microbiome Selection Could Spur Next-Generation Plant Breeding Strategies.

Authors:  Murali Gopal; Alka Gupta
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Native root-associated bacteria rescue a plant from a sudden-wilt disease that emerged during continuous cropping.

Authors:  Rakesh Santhanam; Van Thi Luu; Arne Weinhold; Jay Goldberg; Youngjoo Oh; Ian T Baldwin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  High functional diversity stimulates diversification in experimental microbial communities.

Authors:  Alexandre Jousset; Nico Eisenhauer; Monika Merker; Nicolas Mouquet; Stefan Scheu
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 14.136

View more
  7 in total

1.  Artificially selecting bacterial communities using propagule strategies.

Authors:  Chang-Yu Chang; Melisa L Osborne; Djordje Bajic; Alvaro Sanchez
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 2.  Directed Evolution of Microbial Communities.

Authors:  Álvaro Sánchez; Jean C C Vila; Chang-Yu Chang; Juan Diaz-Colunga; Sylvie Estrela; María Rebolleda-Gomez
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 12.981

3.  Closed microbial communities self-organize to persistently cycle carbon.

Authors:  Luis Miguel de Jesús Astacioa; Kaumudi H Prabhakara; Zeqian Li; Harry Mickalide; Seppe Kuehn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Steering ecological-evolutionary dynamics to improve artificial selection of microbial communities.

Authors:  Li Xie; Wenying Shou
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Artificial Selection on Microbiomes To Breed Microbiomes That Confer Salt Tolerance to Plants.

Authors:  Ulrich G Mueller; Thomas E Juenger; Melissa R Kardish; Alexis L Carlson; Kathleen M Burns; Joseph A Edwards; Chad C Smith; Chi-Chun Fang; David L Des Marais
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 6.496

6.  Artificial selection methods from evolutionary computing show promise for directed evolution of microbes.

Authors:  Alexander Lalejini; Emily Dolson; Anya E Vostinar; Luis Zaman
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 8.713

7.  An evolutionary algorithm for designing microbial communities via environmental modification.

Authors:  Alan R Pacheco; Daniel Segrè
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 4.118

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.