Literature DB >> 21444314

Evolution in metacommunities.

Charles J Goodnight1.   

Abstract

A metacommunity can be defined as a set of communities that are linked by migration, and extinction and recolonization. In metacommunities, evolution can occur not only by processes that occur within communities such as drift and individual selection, but also by among-community processes, such as divergent selection owing to random differences among communities in species composition, and group and community-level selection. The effect of these among-community-level processes depends on the pattern of migration among communities. Migrating units may be individuals (migrant pool model), groups of individuals (single-species propagule pool model) or multi-species associations (multi-species propagule pool model). The most interesting case is the multi-species propagule pool model. Although this pattern of migration may a priori seem rare, it becomes more plausible in small well-defined 'communities' such as symbiotic associations between two or a few species. Theoretical models and experimental studies show that community selection is potentially an effective evolutionary force. Such evolution can occur either through genetic changes within species or through changes in the species composition of the communities. Although laboratory studies show that community selection can be important, little is known about how important it is in natural populations.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21444314      PMCID: PMC3081572          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  18 in total

1.  Quantitative trait loci and gene interaction: the quantitative genetics of metapopulations.

Authors:  C J Goodnight
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Artificial selection of microbial ecosystems for 3-chloroaniline biodegradation.

Authors:  W Swenson; J Arendt; D S Wilson
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.491

3.  Artificial ecosystem selection.

Authors:  W Swenson; D S Wilson; R Elias
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Multilevel phenotypic selection on morphological characters in a metapopulation of Silene tatarica.

Authors:  Jouni Aspi; Anne Jäkäläniemi; Juha Tuomi; Pirkko Siikamäki
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  The ecology and behavior of burying beetles.

Authors:  M P Scott
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 19.686

6.  Antagonistic multilevel selection on size and architecture in variable density settings.

Authors:  Cynthia Weinig; Jill A Johnston; Charles G Willis; Julin N Maloof
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  On indirect genetic effects in structured populations.

Authors:  A F Agrawal; E D Brodie; M J Wade
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Wright's shifting balance theory: an experimental study.

Authors:  M J Wade; C J Goodnight
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-08-30       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Experimental studies of group selection: what do they tell us about group selection in nature?

Authors:  C J Goodnight; L Stevens
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  Group selections among laboratory populations of Tribolium.

Authors:  M J Wade
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  11 in total

1.  Ecology: Abundant equals nested.

Authors:  Colin Fontaine
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Forward from the crossroads of ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Jennifer K Rowntree; David M Shuker; Richard F Preziosi
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Targeting the energy guardian AMPK: another avenue for treating cardiomyopathy?

Authors:  Tian Li; Shuai Jiang; Zhi Yang; Zhiqiang Ma; Wei Yi; Dongjin Wang; Yang Yang
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 9.261

4.  Artificially selecting bacterial communities using propagule strategies.

Authors:  Chang-Yu Chang; Melisa L Osborne; Djordje Bajic; Alvaro Sanchez
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 5.  Directed Evolution of Microbial Communities.

Authors:  Álvaro Sánchez; Jean C C Vila; Chang-Yu Chang; Juan Diaz-Colunga; Sylvie Estrela; María Rebolleda-Gomez
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 12.981

6.  Engineering complex communities by directed evolution.

Authors:  Chang-Yu Chang; Jean C C Vila; Madeline Bender; Richard Li; Madeleine C Mankowski; Molly Bassette; Julia Borden; Stefan Golfier; Paul Gerald L Sanchez; Rachel Waymack; Xinwen Zhu; Juan Diaz-Colunga; Sylvie Estrela; Maria Rebolleda-Gomez; Alvaro Sanchez
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 15.460

7.  Dispersal strategies, few dominating or many coexisting: the effect of environmental spatial structure and multiple sources of mortality.

Authors:  Lucie Büchi; Séverine Vuilleumier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Getting the Hologenome Concept Right: an Eco-Evolutionary Framework for Hosts and Their Microbiomes.

Authors:  Kevin R Theis; Nolwenn M Dheilly; Jonathan L Klassen; Robert M Brucker; John F Baines; Thomas C G Bosch; John F Cryan; Scott F Gilbert; Charles J Goodnight; Elisabeth A Lloyd; Jan Sapp; Philippe Vandenkoornhuyse; Ilana Zilber-Rosenberg; Eugene Rosenberg; Seth R Bordenstein
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 6.496

9.  Tripartite species interaction: eukaryotic hosts suffer more from phage susceptible than from phage resistant bacteria.

Authors:  Carolin C Wendling; Agnes Piecyk; Dominik Refardt; Cynthia Chibani; Robert Hertel; Heiko Liesegang; Boyke Bunk; Jörg Overmann; Olivia Roth
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Coevolutionary constraints? The environment alters tripartite interaction traits in a legume.

Authors:  Katy D Heath; Katie E McGhee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.