Literature DB >> 28563804

THE FUNCTION OF CALL ALTERNATION IN ANURAN AMPHIBIANS: A TEST OF THREE HYPOTHESES.

Joshua J Schwartz1.   

Abstract

Males of many species of anurans alternate calls with those of their neighbors in a chorus. This pattern of calling reduces signal interference and may: 1) facilitate intermale spacing because males can better gauge the intensity of neighbors' calls if these calls do not overlap with their own; 2) help preserve species-specific temporal information in calls required to attract females; and/or 3) make it easier for females to localize males in the chorus. I tested these hypotheses with three species that exhibit call alternation, Hyla crucifer, H. versicolor, and H. microcephala. Males of all three species gave more aggressive calls to high-intensity synthetic stimuli that alternated with their calls than to those that overlapped their calls. These results support the first hypothesis. Results of four-speaker female choice experiments using alternating and overlapping calls indicate that preservation of signal integrity also is important in H. versicolor and H. microcephala, species that have fine-scale temporal information in their calls. However, the third hypothesis was not supported; females failed to discriminate among alternating and overlapping calls if the problem of signal disruption was eliminated or irrelevant. © 1987 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Year:  1987        PMID: 28563804     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1987.tb05818.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  12 in total

1.  Vocal competition in male Xenopus laevis frogs.

Authors:  Martha L Tobias; Anna Corke; Jeremy Korsh; David Yin; Darcy B Kelley
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Perception of complex sounds by the green treefrog, Hyla cinerea: envelope and fine-structure cues.

Authors:  A M Simmons; R C Buxbaum; M P Mirin
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Signal recognition by frogs in the presence of temporally fluctuating chorus-shaped noise.

Authors:  Alejandro Vélez; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Signalling through acoustic windows: Nightingales avoid interspecific competition by short-term adjustment of song timing.

Authors:  Henrik Brumm
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-08-19       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Synchronized mating signals in a communication network: the challenge of avoiding predators while attracting mates.

Authors:  Henry D Legett; Rachel A Page; Ximena E Bernal
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Treefrogs as animal models for research on auditory scene analysis and the cocktail party problem.

Authors:  Mark A Bee
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 2.997

7.  Analyzing acoustic interactions in natural bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) choruses.

Authors:  Andrea Megela Simmons; James A Simmons; Mary E Bates
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.231

8.  Does common spatial origin promote the auditory grouping of temporally separated signal elements in grey treefrogs?

Authors:  Mark A Bee; Kasen K Riemersma
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 9.  From microseconds to seconds and minutes-time computation in insect hearing.

Authors:  Manfred Hartbauer; Heiner Römer
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Females and males respond differently to calls impaired by noise in a tree frog.

Authors:  Haodi Zhang; Bicheng Zhu; Ya Zhou; Qiaoling He; Xiaoqian Sun; Jichao Wang; Jianguo Cui
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.