Literature DB >> 19727419

Does common spatial origin promote the auditory grouping of temporally separated signal elements in grey treefrogs?

Mark A Bee1, Kasen K Riemersma.   

Abstract

'Sequential integration' represents a form of auditory grouping in which temporally separated sounds produced by the same source are perceptually bound together over time into a coherent 'auditory stream'. In humans, sequential integration plays important roles in music and speech perception. In this study of the grey treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis), we took advantage of female selectivity for advertisement calls with conspecific pulse rates to investigate common spatial location as a cue for sequential integration. We presented females with two temporally interleaved pulse sequences with pulse rates of 25 pulses/s, which is half the conspecific pulse rate and more similar to that of H. versicolor, a syntopically breeding heterospecific. We tested the hypothesis that common spatial origin between the two pulse sequences would promote their integration into a coherent auditory stream with an attractive conspecific pulse rate. As the spatial separation between the speakers broadcasting the interleaved pulse sequences decreased from 180° to 0°, more females responded and females exhibited shorter response latencies and travelled shorter distances en route to a speaker. However, even in the 180° condition, most females (74%) still responded. Detailed video analyses revealed no evidence to suggest that patterns of female phonotaxis resulted from impaired abilities to localize sound sources in the spatially separated conditions. Together, our results suggest that females were fairly permissive of spatial incoherence between the interleaved pulses sequences and that common spatial origin may be only a relatively weak cue for sequential integration in grey treefrogs.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 19727419      PMCID: PMC2603077          DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.01.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  27 in total

Review 1.  Neural basis of hearing in real-world situations.

Authors:  A S Feng; R Ratnam
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  Long-term temporal integration in the anuran auditory system.

Authors:  T B Alder; G J Rose
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Acoustic interference limits call detection in a Neotropical frog Hyla ebraccata.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.844

4.  Evolution of hearing in vertebrates: the inner ears and processing.

Authors:  R R Fay; A N Popper
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Amodal completion of acoustic signals by a nonhuman primate.

Authors:  C T Miller; E Dibble; M D Hauser
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Non-parallel coevolution of sender and receiver in the acoustic communication system of treefrogs.

Authors:  Johannes Schul; Sarah L Bush
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Auditory scene analysis by echolocation in bats.

Authors:  C F Moss; A Surlykke
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Integration and recovery processes contribute to the temporal selectivity of neurons in the midbrain of the northern leopard frog, Rana pipiens.

Authors:  T B Alder; G J Rose
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Perception of mistuned harmonics in complex sounds by the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana).

Authors:  A M Simmons; M E Bean
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.231

10.  Time-critical integration of formants for perception of communication calls in mice.

Authors:  Diana B Geissler; Günter Ehret
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-06-17       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  16 in total

1.  A precedence effect resolves phantom sound source illusions in the parasitoid fly Ormia ochracea.

Authors:  Norman Lee; Damian O Elias; Andrew C Mason
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Receiver psychology turns 20: is it time for a broader approach?

Authors:  Cory T Miller; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.844

3.  Relative comparisons of call parameters enable auditory grouping in frogs.

Authors:  Hamilton E Farris; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Sound transmission and the recognition of temporally degraded sexual advertisement signals in Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis).

Authors:  Michael C Kuczynski; Alejandro Vélez; Joshua J Schwartz; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 5.  Sound source localization and segregation with internally coupled ears: the treefrog model.

Authors:  Mark A Bee; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.086

6.  A precedence effect underlies preferences for calls with leading pulses in the grey treefrog, Hyla versicolor.

Authors:  Vincent T Marshall; H Carl Gerhardt
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 7.  Sound source perception in anuran amphibians.

Authors:  Mark A Bee
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 6.627

8.  Spatial hearing in Cope's gray treefrog: I. Open and closed loop experiments on sound localization in the presence and absence of noise.

Authors:  Michael S Caldwell; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Spatial hearing in Cope's gray treefrog: II. Frequency-dependent directionality in the amplitude and phase of tympanum vibrations.

Authors:  Michael S Caldwell; Norman Lee; Katrina M Schrode; Anastasia R Johns; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Dip listening or modulation masking? Call recognition by green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea) in temporally fluctuating noise.

Authors:  Alejandro Vélez; Gerlinde Höbel; Noah M Gordon; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.