Literature DB >> 21442049

Vocal competition in male Xenopus laevis frogs.

Martha L Tobias1, Anna Corke, Jeremy Korsh, David Yin, Darcy B Kelley.   

Abstract

Male Xenopus laevis frogs produce underwater advertisement calls that attract gravid females and suppress calling by male competitors. Here we explore whether groups of males establish vocal ranks and whether auditory cues alone suffice for vocal suppression. Tests of male-male pairs within assigned groups reveal linear vocal dominance relations, in which each male has a defined rank. Both the duration over which males interact, as well as the number of competitive opportunities, affect linearity. Linear dominance across the group is stable for about 2 weeks; rank is dynamic. Males engage in physical interactions (clasping) while paired but clasping and vocal rank are not correlated. Playbacks of advertisement calls suppress calling and calls from high- and low-ranking males are equally effective. Thus, auditory cues alone suffice to suppress vocal behavior. Playback intensities equivalent to a nearby male advertising effectively suppress calling while low-intensity playbacks are either ineffective or stimulate vocal behavior. X. laevis advertisement calls are biphasic, composed of alternating fast and slow click trills. Approximately half the males tested are more vocally suppressed by all slow than by all fast trills; thus, these males can distinguish between the two phases. The fully aquatic family Pipidae diverged from terrestrial ancestors approximately 170 mya. Vocal suppression in the X. laevis mating system may represent the translation of an ancient anuran social strategy to underwater life.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21442049      PMCID: PMC3064475          DOI: 10.1007/s00265-010-0991-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol        ISSN: 0340-5443            Impact factor:   2.980


  13 in total

1.  Bimodal signal requisite for agonistic behavior in a dart-poison frog, Epipedobates femoralis.

Authors:  Peter M Narins; Walter Hödl; Daniela S Grabul
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-01-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Memory of opponents is more potent than visual sign stimuli after social hierarchy has been established.

Authors:  Wayne J Korzan; Erik Höglund; Michael J Watt; Gina L Forster; Øyvind Øverli; Jodi L Lukkes; Cliff H Summers
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  The smell of success and failure: the role of intrinsic and extrinsic chemical signals on the social behavior of crayfish.

Authors:  Paul A Moore; Daniel A Bergman
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.326

4.  THE FUNCTION OF CALL ALTERNATION IN ANURAN AMPHIBIANS: A TEST OF THREE HYPOTHESES.

Authors:  Joshua J Schwartz
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Sexual differences in the auditory system of the tree frog Eleutherodactylus coqui.

Authors:  P M Narins; R R Capranica
Journal:  Science       Date:  1976-04-23       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Dominance and queen succession in captive colonies of the eusocial naked mole-rat, Heterocephalus glaber.

Authors:  F M Clarke; C G Faulkes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Vocal communication between male Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  Martha L Tobias; Candace Barnard; Robert O'Hagan; Sam H Horng; Masha Rand; Darcy B Kelley
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2003-12-29       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  Individual voice recognition in a territorial frog (Rana catesbeiana).

Authors:  Mark A Bee; H Carl Gerhardt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Relationship between social rank and cortisol and testosterone concentrations in male cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis).

Authors:  P W Czoty; R W Gould; M A Nader
Journal:  J Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.627

10.  Androgen and gonadotropin effects on male mate calls in South African clawed frogs, Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  D M Wetzel; D B Kelley
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 3.587

View more
  9 in total

1.  The Xenopus amygdala mediates socially appropriate vocal communication signals.

Authors:  Ian C Hall; Irene H Ballagh; Darcy B Kelley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  A neuroendocrine basis for the hierarchical control of frog courtship vocalizations.

Authors:  Erik Zornik; Darcy B Kelley
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 8.606

3.  Sex differences and endocrine regulation of auditory-evoked, neural responses in African clawed frogs (Xenopus).

Authors:  Ian C Hall; Sarah M N Woolley; Ursula Kwong-Brown; Darcy B Kelley
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Evolution of advertisement calls in African clawed frogs.

Authors:  Martha L Tobias; Ben J Evans; Darcy B Kelley
Journal:  Behaviour       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.991

5.  Male-male clasping may be part of an alternative reproductive tactic in Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  Heather J Rhodes; Rachel J Stevenson; Courtney L Ego
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Auditory perception exhibits sexual dimorphism and left telencephalic dominance in Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  Yanzhu Fan; Xizi Yue; Fei Xue; Jianguo Cui; Steven E Brauth; Yezhong Tang; Guangzhan Fang
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.422

7.  Preference of spectral features in auditory processing for advertisement calls in the music frogs.

Authors:  Yanzhu Fan; Xizi Yue; Jing Yang; Jiangyan Shen; Di Shen; Yezhong Tang; Guangzhan Fang
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 3.172

8.  Electrophysiological responses to conspecific odorants in Xenopus laevis show potential for chemical signaling.

Authors:  Heather J Rhodes; Melanie Amo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 3.752

9.  Assessing acoustic competition between sibling frog species using rhythm analysis.

Authors:  Alannah Filer; Lara S Burchardt; Berndt J van Rensburg
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 2.912

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.