Literature DB >> 21170157

Signal recognition by frogs in the presence of temporally fluctuating chorus-shaped noise.

Alejandro Vélez1, Mark A Bee.   

Abstract

The background noise generated in large social aggregations of calling individuals is a potent source of auditory masking for animals that communicate acoustically. Despite similarities with the so-called "cocktail-party problem" in humans, few studies have explicitly investigated how non-human animals solve the perceptual task of separating biologically relevant acoustic signals from ambient background noise. Under certain conditions, humans experience a release from auditory masking when speech is presented in speech-like masking noise that fluctuates in amplitude. We tested the hypothesis that females of Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis) experience masking release in artificial chorus noise that fluctuates in level at modulations rates characteristic of those present in ambient chorus noise. We estimated thresholds for recognizing conspecific advertisement calls (pulse rate=40-50 pulses/s) in the presence of unmodulated and sinusoidally amplitude modulated (SAM) chorus-shaped masking noise. We tested two rates of modulation (5 Hz and 45 Hz) because the sounds of frog choruses are modulated at low rates (e.g., less than 5-10 Hz), and because those of species with pulsatile signals are additionally modulated at higher rates typical of the pulse rate of calls (e.g., between 15-50 Hz). Recognition thresholds were similar in the unmodulated and 5-Hz SAM conditions, and 12 dB higher in the 45-Hz SAM condition. These results did not support the hypothesis that female gray treefrogs experience masking release in temporally fluctuating chorus-shaped noise. We discuss our results in terms of modulation masking, and hypothesize that natural amplitude fluctuations in ambient chorus noise may impair mating call perception.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21170157      PMCID: PMC3002223          DOI: 10.1007/s00265-010-0983-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol        ISSN: 0340-5443            Impact factor:   2.980


  28 in total

1.  Long-term temporal integration in the anuran auditory system.

Authors:  T B Alder; G J Rose
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Acoustic interference limits call detection in a Neotropical frog Hyla ebraccata.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.844

3.  Consonant identification under maskers with sinusoidal modulation: masking release or modulation interference?

Authors:  B J Kwon; C W Turner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Spatial unmasking of nearby speech sources in a simulated anechoic environment.

Authors:  B G Shinn-Cunningham; J Schickler; N Kopco; R Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Understanding speech in modulated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Peggy B Nelson; Su-Hyun Jin; Arlene Earley Carney; David A Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effect of duration on amplitude-modulation masking.

Authors:  Rebecca E Millman; Christian Lorenzi; Frédéric Apoux; Christian Füllgrabe; Gary G R Green; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Influence of amplitude modulated noise on the recognition of communication signals in the grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus.

Authors:  B Ronacher; C Hoffmann
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Hearing speech against spatially separate competing speech versus competing noise.

Authors:  William Noble; Stephen Perrett
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-11

9.  Non-parallel coevolution of sender and receiver in the acoustic communication system of treefrogs.

Authors:  Johannes Schul; Sarah L Bush
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Effect of multiple speechlike maskers on binaural speech recognition in normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  A W Bronkhorst; R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  18 in total

1.  Receiver psychology turns 20: is it time for a broader approach?

Authors:  Cory T Miller; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  Evolutionary adaptations for the temporal processing of natural sounds by the anuran peripheral auditory system.

Authors:  Katrina M Schrode; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Differential effects of sound level and temporal structure of calls on phonotaxis by female gray treefrogs, Hyla versicolor.

Authors:  Kevin W Christie; Johannes Schul; Albert S Feng
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Sound transmission and the recognition of temporally degraded sexual advertisement signals in Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis).

Authors:  Michael C Kuczynski; Alejandro Vélez; Joshua J Schwartz; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 5.  Sound source perception in anuran amphibians.

Authors:  Mark A Bee
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Dip listening and the cocktail party problem in grey treefrogs: Signal recognition in temporally fluctuating noise.

Authors:  Alejandro Vélez; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  Pulse-number discrimination by Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis) in modulated and unmodulated noise.

Authors:  Alejandro Vélez; Betsy Jo Linehan-Skillings; Yuwen Gu; Yuting Sun; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Spatial release from masking in a free-field source identification task by gray treefrogs.

Authors:  Vivek Nityananda; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-01-08       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Spatial release from masking improves sound pattern discrimination along a biologically relevant pulse-rate continuum in gray treefrogs.

Authors:  Jessica L Ward; Nathan P Buerkle; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Dip listening or modulation masking? Call recognition by green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea) in temporally fluctuating noise.

Authors:  Alejandro Vélez; Gerlinde Höbel; Noah M Gordon; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.