Literature DB >> 30509954

Decoupling the Variances of Heterosis and Inbreeding Effects Is Evidenced in Yeast's Life-History and Proteomic Traits.

Marianyela Petrizzelli1, Dominique de Vienne1, Christine Dillmann2.   

Abstract

Heterosis (hybrid vigor) and inbreeding depression, commonly considered as corollary phenomena, could nevertheless be decoupled under certain assumptions according to theoretical population genetics works. To explore this issue on real data, we analyzed the components of genetic variation in a population derived from a half-diallel cross between strains from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and S. uvarum, two related yeast species involved in alcoholic fermentation. A large number of phenotypic traits, either molecular (coming from quantitative proteomics) or related to fermentation and life history, were measured during alcoholic fermentation. Because the parental strains were included in the design, we were able to distinguish between inbreeding effects, which measure phenotypic differences between inbred and hybrids, and heterosis, which measures phenotypic differences between a specific hybrid and the other hybrids sharing a common parent. The sources of phenotypic variation differed depending on the temperature, indicating the predominance of genotype-by-environment interactions. Decomposing the total genetic variance into variances of additive (intra- and interspecific) effects, of inbreeding effects, and of heterosis (intra- and interspecific) effects, we showed that the distribution of variance components defined clear-cut groups of proteins and traits. Moreover, it was possible to cluster fermentation and life-history traits into most proteomic groups. Within groups, we observed positive, negative, or null correlations between the variances of heterosis and inbreeding effects. To our knowledge, such a decoupling had never been experimentally demonstrated. This result suggests that, despite a common evolutionary history of individuals within a species, the different types of traits have been subject to different selective pressures.
Copyright © 2019 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hybrid vigor; diallel crossing; inbreeding depression; mixed-effect genetic model

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30509954      PMCID: PMC6366921          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.118.301635

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  45 in total

Review 1.  The genetic basis of inbreeding depression.

Authors:  B Charlesworth; D Charlesworth
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  The population genetic theory of hidden variation and genetic robustness.

Authors:  Joachim Hermisson; Günter P Wagner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The FunCat, a functional annotation scheme for systematic classification of proteins from whole genomes.

Authors:  Andreas Ruepp; Alfred Zollner; Dieter Maier; Kaj Albermann; Jean Hani; Martin Mokrejs; Igor Tetko; Ulrich Güldener; Gertrud Mannhaupt; Martin Münsterkötter; H Werner Mewes
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Genetic architecture of nonadditive inheritance in Arabidopsis thaliana hybrids.

Authors:  Danelle K Seymour; Eunyoung Chae; Dominik G Grimm; Carmen Martín Pizarro; Anette Habring-Müller; François Vasseur; Barbara Rakitsch; Karsten M Borgwardt; Daniel Koenig; Detlef Weigel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Progress toward understanding heterosis in crop plants.

Authors:  Patrick S Schnable; Nathan M Springer
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 26.379

6.  Yeast proteome variations reveal different adaptive responses to grape must fermentation.

Authors:  Mélisande Blein-Nicolas; Warren Albertin; Benoît Valot; Philippe Marullo; Delphine Sicard; Christophe Giraud; Sylvie Huet; Aurélie Bourgais; Christine Dillmann; Dominique de Vienne; Michel Zivy
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  How does epistasis influence the response to selection?

Authors:  N H Barton
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  The YEASTRACT database: a tool for the analysis of transcription regulatory associations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Miguel C Teixeira; Pedro Monteiro; Pooja Jain; Sandra Tenreiro; Alexandra R Fernandes; Nuno P Mira; Marta Alenquer; Ana T Freitas; Arlindo L Oliveira; Isabel Sá-Correia
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Hybridization within Saccharomyces Genus Results in Homoeostasis and Phenotypic Novelty in Winemaking Conditions.

Authors:  Telma da Silva; Warren Albertin; Christine Dillmann; Marina Bely; Stéphane la Guerche; Christophe Giraud; Sylvie Huet; Delphine Sicard; Isabelle Masneuf-Pomarede; Dominique de Vienne; Philippe Marullo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Towards Defining Heterotic Gene Pools in Pearl Millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.].

Authors:  A Radhika Ramya; Lal Ahamed M; C Tara Satyavathi; Abhishek Rathore; Pooja Katiyar; A G Bhasker Raj; Sushil Kumar; Rajeev Gupta; Mahesh D Mahendrakar; Rattan S Yadav; Rakesh K Srivastava
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 5.753

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparative proteomic analysis reveals that the Heterosis of two maize hybrids is related to enhancement of stress response and photosynthesis respectively.

Authors:  Daoping Wang; Yongying Mu; Xiaojiao Hu; Bo Ma; Zhibo Wang; Li Zhu; Jiang Xu; Changling Huang; Yinghong Pan
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 4.215

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.