Literature DB >> 28555402

Clostridium difficile infections in Finland, 2008-2015: trends, diagnostics and ribotypes.

S Mentula1, S M Kotila2, O Lyytikäinen3, S Ibrahem2, J Ollgren3, A Virolainen2.   

Abstract

We evaluated Clostridium difficile (CD) diagnostics in Finnish clinical microbiology laboratories during 2006-2011, with an update in 2015, in relation to CD surveillance data of the National Infectious Disease Register (NIDR) and ribotyping data from the national reference laboratory during the years 2008-2015. In 2011, diagnostic activity varied regionally more than three-fold and the positivity rate ranged between 7 and 21%. Nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) was implemented in the regions with high activity and NAAT users tested 30% more patients and found 15% more cases per population than those not using it. Culture was performed in 79% of laboratories, primary toxin testing by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) in 83% and by NAAT in 17%. In 2014, 12/19 laboratories used NAAT as the primary detection method and four as the secondary method, and ten cultured. Increasing usage of NAAT was not systematically related to various trends detected regionally in annual CD rates. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) ribotyping of 1771 CD isolates (4.1% of CD cases) identified 146 distinct profiles, of which 37% were binary toxin positive. The most common ribotype was 027, but its proportion decreased, while 078 slightly increased. Transition from culture to NAAT in CD infection (CDI) diagnostics did not cause a significant increase in the observed CDI incidence. Major differences between diagnostic activity, methods and strategies in different regions have persisted over the years, which should be considered when comparing the regional epidemiology of CDI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28555402     DOI: 10.1007/s10096-017-3017-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  23 in total

1.  Regional differences in Clostridium difficile infections in relation to fluoroquinolone and proton pump inhibitor use, Finland, 2008-2011.

Authors:  Mari Kanerva; Jukka Ollgren; Tinna Voipio; Silja Mentula; Outi Lyytikäinen
Journal:  Infect Dis (Lond)       Date:  2015-04-02

2.  "Second-look" cytotoxicity: an evaluation of culture plus cytotoxin assay of Clostridium difficile isolates in the laboratory diagnosis of CDAD.

Authors:  E Bouza; T Peláez; R Alonso; P Catalán; P Muñoz; M R Créixems
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 3.  Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection by toxin detection kits: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tim Planche; Adamma Aghaizu; Richard Holliman; Peter Riley; Jan Poloniecki; Aodhán Breathnach; Sanjeev Krishna
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 25.071

4.  Diagnostic testing for Clostridium difficile: a comprehensive survey of laboratories in England.

Authors:  S D Goldenberg; G L French
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2011-07-02       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 5.  Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of Clostridium difficile infections.

Authors:  Christina M Surawicz; Lawrence J Brandt; David G Binion; Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan; Scott R Curry; Peter H Gilligan; Lynne V McFarland; Mark Mellow; Brian S Zuckerbraun
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Comparison of FecalSwab and ESwab devices for storage and transportation of Diarrheagenic bacteria.

Authors:  Jari J Hirvonen; Suvi-Sirkku Kaukoranta
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases: update of the diagnostic guidance document for Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  M J T Crobach; T Planche; C Eckert; F Barbut; E M Terveer; O M Dekkers; M H Wilcox; E J Kuijper
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 8.067

8.  Diagnostic trends in Clostridium difficile detection in Finnish microbiology laboratories.

Authors:  Eija Könönen; Marja Rasinperä; Anni Virolainen; Silja Mentula; Outi Lyytikäinen
Journal:  Anaerobe       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 3.331

9.  Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infections: there is light at the end of the colon.

Authors:  Stephen M Brecher; Susan M Novak-Weekley; Elisabeth Nagy
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Hospitalizations and deaths associated with Clostridium difficile infection, Finland, 1996-2004.

Authors:  Outi Lyytikäinen; Heli Turunen; Reijo Sund; Marja Rasinperä; Eija Könönen; Petri Ruutu; Ilmo Keskimäki
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  1 in total

1.  Prospective Evaluation of the mariPOC Test for Detection of Clostridioides difficile Glutamate Dehydrogenase and Toxins A/B.

Authors:  Roosa Savolainen; Juha M Koskinen; Silja Mentula; Janne O Koskinen; Suvi-Sirkku Kaukoranta
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 5.948

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.