Literature DB >> 28555275

Control of force during rapid visuomotor force-matching tasks can be described by discrete time PID control algorithms.

Jakob Lund Dideriksen1, Daniel F Feeney2, Awad M Almuklass2,3, Roger M Enoka2.   

Abstract

Force trajectories during isometric force-matching tasks involving isometric contractions vary substantially across individuals. In this study, we investigated if this variability can be explained by discrete time proportional, integral, derivative (PID) control algorithms with varying model parameters. To this end, we analyzed the pinch force trajectories of 24 subjects performing two rapid force-matching tasks with visual feedback. Both tasks involved isometric contractions to a target force of 10% maximal voluntary contraction. One task involved a single action (pinch) and the other required a double action (concurrent pinch and wrist extension). 50,000 force trajectories were simulated with a computational neuromuscular model whose input was determined by a PID controller with different PID gains and frequencies at which the controller adjusted muscle commands. The goal was to find the best match between each experimental force trajectory and all simulated trajectories. It was possible to identify one realization of the PID controller that matched the experimental force produced during each task for most subjects (average index of similarity: 0.87 ± 0.12; 1 = perfect similarity). The similarities for both tasks were significantly greater than that would be expected by chance (single action: p = 0.01; double action: p = 0.04). Furthermore, the identified control frequencies in the simulated PID controller with the greatest similarities decreased as task difficulty increased (single action: 4.0 ± 1.8 Hz; double action: 3.1 ± 1.3 Hz). Overall, the results indicate that discrete time PID controllers are realistic models for the neural control of force in rapid force-matching tasks involving isometric contractions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computational models; Isometric force; Motor control; Visuomotor tasks

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28555275     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-4995-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  46 in total

1.  Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Konrad P Körding; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Sensorimotor integration in human postural control.

Authors:  R J Peterka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Mathematical models of proprioceptors. I. Control and transduction in the muscle spindle.

Authors:  Milana P Mileusnic; Ian E Brown; Ning Lan; Gerald E Loeb
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Aging, visual intermittency, and variability in isometric force output.

Authors:  Jacob J Sosnoff; Karl M Newell
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.077

5.  Visual control of stable and unstable loads: what is the feedback delay and extent of linear time-invariant control?

Authors:  Ian D Loram; Martin Lakie; Peter J Gawthrop
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-01-26       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Muscle activation and time to task failure differ with load type and contraction intensity for a human hand muscle.

Authors:  Katrina S Maluf; Minoru Shinohara; Jennifer L Stephenson; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Processing visual feedback information for movement control.

Authors:  L G Carlton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Dynamic regulation of sensorimotor integration in human postural control.

Authors:  Robert J Peterka; Patrick J Loughlin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-09-17       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Refractoriness in sustained visuo-manual control: is the refractory duration intrinsic or does it depend on external system properties?

Authors:  Cornelis van de Kamp; Peter J Gawthrop; Henrik Gollee; Ian D Loram
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Motor Neuron Pools of Synergistic Thigh Muscles Share Most of Their Synaptic Input.

Authors:  Christopher M Laine; Eduardo Martinez-Valdes; Deborah Falla; Frank Mayer; Dario Farina
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  2 in total

1.  Variability in common synaptic input to motor neurons modulates both force steadiness and pegboard time in young and older adults.

Authors:  Daniel F Feeney; Diba Mani; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Validity and Reliability of Surface Electromyography Measurements from a Wearable Athlete Performance System.

Authors:  Scott K Lynn; Casey M Watkins; Megan A Wong; Katherine Balfany; Daniel F Feeney
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 2.988

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.