Literature DB >> 26338331

Motor Neuron Pools of Synergistic Thigh Muscles Share Most of Their Synaptic Input.

Christopher M Laine1, Eduardo Martinez-Valdes2, Deborah Falla3, Frank Mayer2, Dario Farina4.   

Abstract

Neural control of synergist muscles is not well understood. Presumably, each muscle in a synergistic group receives some unique neural drive and some drive that is also shared in common with other muscles in the group. In this investigation, we sought to characterize the strength, frequency spectrum, and force dependence of the neural drive to the human vastus lateralis and vastus medialis muscles during the production of isometric knee extension forces at 10 and 30% of maximum voluntary effort. High-density surface electromyography recordings were decomposed into motor unit action potentials to examine the neural drive to each muscle. Motor unit coherence analysis was used to characterize the total neural drive to each muscle and the drive shared between muscles. Using a novel approach based on partial coherence analysis, we were also able to study specifically the neural drive unique to each muscle (not shared). The results showed that the majority of neural drive to the vasti muscles was a cross-muscle drive characterized by a force-dependent strength and bandwidth. Muscle-specific neural drive was at low frequencies (<5 Hz) and relatively weak. Frequencies of neural drive associated with afferent feedback (6-12 Hz) and with descending cortical input (∼20 Hz) were almost entirely shared by the two muscles, whereas low-frequency (<5 Hz) drive comprised shared (primary) and muscle-specific (secondary) components. This study is the first to directly investigate the extent of shared versus independent control of synergist muscles at the motor neuron level. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Precisely how the nervous system coordinates the activity of synergist muscles is not well understood. One possibility is that muscles of a synergy share a common neural drive. In this study, we directly compared the relative strength of shared versus independent neural drive to synergistically activated thigh muscles in humans. The results of this analysis support the notion that synergistically activated muscles share most of their neural drive. Scientifically, this study addressed an important gap in our current understanding of how neural drive is delivered to synergist muscles. We have also demonstrated the feasibility of a novel approach to the study of muscle synergies based on partial coherence analysis of motor unit activity.
Copyright © 2015 the authors 0270-6474/15/3512207-10$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EMG; motor units; muscle synergy; partial coherence; quadriceps

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26338331      PMCID: PMC6605305          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0240-15.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  60 in total

1.  Load-independent contributions from motor-unit synchronization to human physiological tremor.

Authors:  D M Halliday; B A Conway; S F Farmer; J R Rosenberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Motor unit physiology: some unresolved issues.

Authors:  R M Enoka; A J Fuglevand
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.217

3.  Afferent roles in hindlimb wipe-reflex trajectories: free-limb kinematics and motor patterns.

Authors:  W J Kargo; S F Giszter
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Rapid correction of aimed movements by summation of force-field primitives.

Authors:  W J Kargo; S F Giszter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The construction of movement by the spinal cord.

Authors:  M C Tresch; P Saltiel; E Bizzi
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Intermittency in the control of continuous force production.

Authors:  A B Slifkin; D E Vaillancourt; K M Newell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Complex movements evoked by microstimulation of precentral cortex.

Authors:  Michael S A Graziano; Charlotte S R Taylor; Tirin Moore
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-05-30       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Short-term synchronization of intercostal motoneurone activity.

Authors:  T A Sears; D Stagg
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Occurrence of widespread motor-unit firing correlations in muscle contractions: their role in the generation of tremor and time-varying voluntary force.

Authors:  S Erimaki; C N Christakos
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Estimation of single motor unit conduction velocity from surface electromyogram signals detected with linear electrode arrays.

Authors:  D Farina; W Muhammad; E Fortunato; O Meste; R Merletti; H Rix
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.079

View more
  38 in total

1.  Beta-band motor unit coherence and nonlinear surface EMG features of the first dorsal interosseous muscle vary with force.

Authors:  Lara McManus; Matthew W Flood; Madeleine M Lowery
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Intermuscular coherence reflects functional coordination.

Authors:  Christopher M Laine; Francisco J Valero-Cuevas
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Control of force during rapid visuomotor force-matching tasks can be described by discrete time PID control algorithms.

Authors:  Jakob Lund Dideriksen; Daniel F Feeney; Awad M Almuklass; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Tick-tock, spinal motor neurons go with the cortical clock in young infants.

Authors:  Francesco Lacquaniti; Myrka Zago; Dario Farina
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Functional connectivity in the neuromuscular system underlying bimanual coordination.

Authors:  Ingmar E J de Vries; Andreas Daffertshofer; Dick F Stegeman; Tjeerd W Boonstra
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Neuromorphic meets neuromechanics, part II: the role of fusimotor drive.

Authors:  Kian Jalaleddini; Chuanxin Minos Niu; Suraj Chakravarthi Raja; Won Joon Sohn; Gerald E Loeb; Terence D Sanger; Francisco J Valero-Cuevas
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  Regionalization of the stretch reflex in the human vastus medialis.

Authors:  Alessio Gallina; Jean-Sébastien Blouin; Tanya D Ivanova; S Jayne Garland
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Force control during submaximal isometric contractions is associated with walking performance in persons with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Leah A Davis; Mohammed S Alenazy; Awad M Almuklass; Daniel F Feeney; Taian Vieira; Alberto Botter; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Contraction level, but not force direction or wrist position, affects the spatial distribution of motor unit recruitment in the biceps brachii muscle.

Authors:  Daniele Borzelli; Marco Gazzoni; Alberto Botter; Laura Gastaldi; Andrea d'Avella; Taian M Vieira
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  The human motor neuron pools receive a dominant slow-varying common synaptic input.

Authors:  Francesco Negro; Utku Şükrü Yavuz; Dario Farina
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.