Literature DB >> 29769821

Validity and Reliability of Surface Electromyography Measurements from a Wearable Athlete Performance System.

Scott K Lynn1, Casey M Watkins2, Megan A Wong3, Katherine Balfany1, Daniel F Feeney4.   

Abstract

The Athos ® wearable system integrates surface electromyography (sEMG ) electrodes into the construction of compression athletic apparel. The Athos system reduces the complexity and increases the portability of collecting EMG data and provides processed data to the end user. The objective of the study was to determine the reliability and validity of Athos as compared with a research grade sEMG system. Twelve healthy subjects performed 7 trials on separate days (1 baseline trial and 6 repeated trials). In each trial subjects wore the wearable sEMG system and had a research grade sEMG system's electrodes placed just distal on the same muscle, as close as possible to the wearable system's electrodes. The muscles tested were the vastus lateralis (VL), vastus medialis (VM), and biceps femoris (BF). All testing was done on an isokinetic dynamometer. Baseline testing involved performing isometric 1 repetition maximum tests for the knee extensors and flexors and three repetitions of concentric-concentric knee flexion and extension at MVC for each testing speed: 60, 180, and 300 deg/sec. Repeated trials 2-7 each comprised 9 sets where each set included three repetitions of concentric-concentric knee flexion-extension. Each repeated trial (2-7) comprised one set at each speed and percent MVC (50%, 75%, 100%) combination. The wearable system and research grade sEMG data were processed using the same methods and aligned in time. The amplitude metrics calculated from the sEMG for each repetition were the peak amplitude, sum of the linear envelope, and 95th percentile. Validity results comprise two main findings. First, there is not a significant effect of system (Athos or research grade system) on the repetition amplitude metrics (95%, peak, or sum). Second, the relationship between torque and sEMG is not significantly different between Athos and the research grade system. For reliability testing, the variation across trials and averaged across speeds was 0.8%, 7.3%, and 0.2% higher for Athos from BF, VL and VM, respectively. Also, using the standard deviation of the MVC normalized repetition amplitude, the research grade system showed 10.7% variability while Athos showed 12%. The wearable technology (Athos) provides sEMG measures that are consistent with controlled, research grade technologies and data collection procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Athos; EMG; Wearable technology; electromyography

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29769821      PMCID: PMC5950737     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  31 in total

1.  Experimental simulation of cat electromyogram: evidence for algebraic summation of motor-unit action-potential trains.

Authors:  S J Day; M Hulliger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Methodological aspects of SEMG recordings for force estimation--a tutorial and review.

Authors:  Didier Staudenmann; Karin Roeleveld; Dick F Stegeman; Jaap H van Dieën
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 2.368

3.  Electromyographic analysis of the gluteus medius in five weight-bearing exercises.

Authors:  David A Krause; Rebecca S Jacobs; Katie E Pilger; Becky R Sather; Seth P Sibunka; John H Hollman
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 4.  The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG: an update.

Authors:  Dario Farina; Roberto Merletti; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2014-10-02

5.  Electromyography reliability in maximal and submaximal isometric contractions.

Authors:  J F Yang; D A Winter
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Differences in kinematics and electromyographic activity between men and women during the single-legged squat.

Authors:  Brian L Zeller; Jean L McCrory; W Ben Kibler; Timothy L Uhl
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Relative scapular muscle activity ratios are altered in subacromial pain syndrome.

Authors:  Lori A Michener; Sapna Sharma; Ann M Cools; Mark K Timmons
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Electromyographical Comparison of a Traditional, Suspension Device, and Towel Pull-Up.

Authors:  Ronald L Snarr; Ashleigh V Hallmark; Jason C Casey; Michael R Esco
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.193

9.  Effects of kinetic chain exercise using EMG-biofeedback on balance and lower extremity muscle activation in stroke patients.

Authors:  Yong Keun Park; Je Ho Kim
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-08-10

10.  Intraindividual Variability and Validity in Smart Apparel Muscle Activity Measurements During Exercise in Men.

Authors:  Jonathan M Aquino; Jenevieve L Roper
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2018-01-02
View more
  8 in total

1.  Energy Expenditure and Muscular Recruitment Patterns of Riding a Novel Electrically Powered Skateboard.

Authors:  Anthony J Robinson; Robert P Carter; Jonathan D Browne; Jonathan Hu; Michael T Arnold; Jaxon T Baum; Eric V Neufeld; Brett A Dolezal
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2020-12-01

2.  Development and Characterization of Embroidery-Based Textile Electrodes for Surface EMG Detection.

Authors:  Hyelim Kim; Siyeon Kim; Daeyoung Lim; Wonyoung Jeong
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 3.  Review on Smart Electro-Clothing Systems (SeCSs).

Authors:  Abu Sadat Muhammad Sayem; Siew Hon Teay; Hasan Shahariar; Paula Luise Fink; Alhussein Albarbar
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Validation of mDurance, A Wearable Surface Electromyography System for Muscle Activity Assessment.

Authors:  Alejandro Molina-Molina; Emilio J Ruiz-Malagón; Francisco Carrillo-Pérez; Luis E Roche-Seruendo; Miguel Damas; Oresti Banos; Felipe García-Pinillos
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 5.  Smart Textiles and Sensorized Garments for Physiological Monitoring: A Review of Available Solutions and Techniques.

Authors:  Alessandra Angelucci; Matteo Cavicchioli; Ilaria A Cintorrino; Giuseppe Lauricella; Chiara Rossi; Sara Strati; Andrea Aliverti
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 6.  Wearable Sensors in Sports for Persons with Disability: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Lorenzo Rum; Oscar Sten; Eleonora Vendrame; Valeria Belluscio; Valentina Camomilla; Giuseppe Vannozzi; Luigi Truppa; Marco Notarantonio; Tommaso Sciarra; Aldo Lazich; Andrea Mannini; Elena Bergamini
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-07       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Exploring textile-based electrode materials for electromyography smart garments.

Authors:  Emily Lam; Milad Alizadeh-Meghrazi; Alessandra Schlums; Ladan Eskandarian; Amin Mahnam; Bastien Moineau; Milos R Popovic
Journal:  J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng       Date:  2022-02-01

Review 8.  A Focused Review on the Flexible Wearable Sensors for Sports: From Kinematics to Physiologies.

Authors:  Lei Liu; Xuefeng Zhang
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 3.523

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.