| Literature DB >> 28545386 |
J Ebersbach1, J Schnitzler2, A Favre2, A N Muellner-Riehl2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A large number of taxa have undergone evolutionary radiations in mountainous areas, rendering alpine systems particularly suitable to study the extrinsic and intrinsic factors that have shaped diversification patterns in plants. The species-rich genus Saxifraga L. is widely distributed throughout the Northern Hemisphere, with high species numbers in the regions adjacent to the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP) in particular the Hengduan Mountains and the Himalayas. Using a dataset of 297 taxa (representing at least 60% of extant Saxifraga species), we explored the variation of infrageneric diversification rates. In addition, we used state-dependent speciation and extinction models to test the effects of geographic distribution in the Hengduan Mountains and the entire QTP region as well as of two morphological traits (cushion habit and specialized lime-secreting glands, so-called hydathodes) on the diversification of this genus.Entities:
Keywords: Evolutionary radiations; Hengduan Mountains; Saxifraga; alpine habitats; diversification rates; key innovations
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28545386 PMCID: PMC5445344 DOI: 10.1186/s12862-017-0967-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Fig. 1Diversification dynamics in Saxifraga. a Best shift scenario according to BAMM. Dashed circles indicate diversification rate shifts. Saxifraga sections are indicated according to Tkach et al. [26] and Gornall et al. [33]. b The eight next likely shift scenarios. c Size reference for marginal shift probabilities for each shift in B. d Colour ramp for diversification rates in species per million years. Results presented here are from the analysis with γ = 0.5 and minimum sampling fractions per section. Results from additional BAMM analyses were concordant with those presented here and are summarized in Additional file 1
Comparison of different diversification rate scenarios for Saxifraga using BayesRate
| Total no. of shifts |
|
| Group H + I + S + P | Back-ground | min | max | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LogL | BF | LogL | BF | |||||
| 3 | PB* | PB | PB | -665.42 | - | -693.57 | - | |
| 3 | PB* | BD | PB | -666.13 | 1.42 | −694.82 | 2.50 | |
| 3 | PB* | BD | BD | -668.67 | 6.50 | −697.40 | 7.66 | |
| 3 | BD* | BD | BD | -670.55 | 10.25 | −698.69 | 10.23 | |
| 2 | PB* | - | PB | -671.25 | 11.66 | −698.38 | 9.61 | |
| 2 | PB* | - | BD | -673.20 | 15.55 | −700.35 | 13.56 | |
| 2 | PB | PB | - | PB | -674.16 | 17.48 | −701.91 | 16.67 |
| 2 | BD* | - | BD | -675.16 | 19.49 | −702.43 | 17.72 | |
| 2 | BD | BD | - | BD | -679.17 | 27.50 | −706.92 | 26.70 |
| 1 | PB | - | - | PB | -682.72 | 34.59 | −708.13 | 29.10 |
| 1 | BD | - | - | BD | -686.32 | 41.80 | −711.20 | 35.26 |
| 1 | - | PB | - | PB | -700.92 | 71.00 | −725.73 | 64.32 |
| 1 | - | PB | - | PB | -703.61 | 76.37 | −728.10 | 69.05 |
| 0 | - | - | - | PB | -722.36 | 113.88 | −748.80 | 110.46 |
| 0 | - | - | - | BD | -723.53 | 116.22 | −749.73 | 112.31 |
Various scenarios for shifts in three Saxifraga clades under pure birth (PB) and birth-death (BD) processes were tested. Asterisks indicate scenarios in which selected clades were constrained to have the same net diversification rates. Log marginal likelihoods (LogL) and results from Bayes factor (BF) tests are given for analyses with minimum and maximum species
Net diversification rate estimates
| min mean [HPD] | max mean [HPD] | |
|---|---|---|
|
| 0.455 [0.349–0.575] | 0.471 [0.357–0.593] |
|
| 0.455 [0.349–0.575] | 0.471 [0.357–0.593] |
| Group H + I + S + P | 0.054 [0.020–0.090] | 0.071 [0.032–0.116] |
| Background rate | 0.171 [0.133–0.211] | 0.184 [0.144–0.226] |
Mean net diversification (speciation - extinction) rates and 95% highest posterior density (HPD) intervals for the different Saxifraga clades from the BayesRate analysis
Fig. 2State-dependent diversification in Saxifraga. a Saxifraga phylogeny with estimated diversification rate regimes according to BAMM (Fig. 1, warmer colours indicate higher rates). Phylogenetic distributions of species’ traits are indicated in green (cushion habit) and blue (lime-secreting hydathodes), the geographical distribution (presence in the Hengduan Mountains) is shown in purple. b Speciation rates in the Hengduan Mountain hotspot vs. other regions. c Speciation rates of cushion saxifrages vs. other life forms. Analysis was constrained to parts of the Saxifraga phylogeny indicated by the star in a Drawing depicts habit of S. lilacina [87], cushion indicated by green shading. d Speciation rates of lineages carrying lime-secreting hydathodes vs. others. The analysis was constrained to parts of the Saxifraga phylogeny indicated by the star in a Drawings depict stem of S. imbricata, with lime-secreting hydathodes on each leaf tip and a single cauline leaf of S. lilacina bearing five lime-secreting hydathodes [87]
Parameter estimates for best scoring GEOSSE model for state-dependent diversification of Saxifraga in the Hengduan Mountains region
| λ mean [HPD] | μ mean [HPD] | d mean [HPD] | r mean [HPD] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hengduan Mountains | 0.277 | – | 0.464 | 0.277 |
| [0.231–0.321] | [0.316–0.623] | [0.231–0.321] | ||
| Other areas | 0.156 | 0.076 | 0.004 | 0.080 |
| [0.118–0.193] | [0.021–0.133] | [0.001–0.008] | [0.049–0.11] | |
| Joined area | 0.006 | |||
| [0.000–0.018] |
Mean parameter estimates and 95% highest probability density (HPD) intervals are given for speciation rates (λ), extinction rate (μ), transition rates to joined area (d) and net diversification rates (r; λ – μ) of Saxifraga in the Hengduan Mountains region
Parameter estimates for best scoring models for state-dependent diversification for cushion life form and lime-secreting hydathodes in Saxifraga
| λ mean [HPD] | μ mean [HPD] | q mean [HPD] | r mean [HPD] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cushions | 0.420 | 0.219 | 0.056 | 0.201 |
| [0.247–0.614] | [0–0.452] | [0.024–0. 096] | [0.094–0.312] | |
| Other life forms | 0.114 | 0.065 | 0.055 | 0.048 |
| [0.051–0.179] | [0–0.188] | [0.002–0.119] | [−0.074–0.143] | |
| Hydathodes | 0.393 | 0.159 | 0.003 | 0.234 |
| [0.226–0.587] | [0–0.395] | [0–0.009] | [0.118–0.356] | |
| Non–hydathodes | 0.173 | 0.063 | 0.006 | 0.110 |
| [0.113–0.244] | [0–0.150] | [0–0.015] | [0.057–0.163] |
Mean parameter estimates and 95% highest probability density (HPD) intervals are given for speciation rates (λ), extinction rates (μ); transition rates (q) and net diversification rates (r; λ – μ)