| Literature DB >> 28804492 |
Qing-Bo Gao1,2, Yan Li1,3, Zhuo-Ma Gengji1,3, Richard J Gornall4, Jiu-Li Wang1,3, Hai-Rui Liu1,3, Liu-Kun Jia1,3, Shi-Long Chen1.
Abstract
The effects of rapid, recent uplift of the Hengduan Mountains on evolution and diversification of young floristic lineages still remain unclear. Here, we investigate diversification of three closely related Saxifraga species with a distribution restricted to the Hengduan Mountains (HM) and southern Tibet, and comment on their taxonomy based on molecular evidence. Three chloroplast DNA fragments (rbcL, trnL-F, trnS-G) and the nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) were employed to study genetic structure across 104 individuals from 12 populations of Saxifraga umbellulata, S. pasumensis, and S. banmaensis. Chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) phylogenies revealed two well supported clades, corresponding to S. umbellulata and S. pasumensis plus S. banmaensis. Topology of the ITS phylogeny was largely congruent with that generated from cpDNA haplotypes, but with minor conflicts which might be caused by incomplete lineage sorting. Analyses of molecular variance of both cpDNA and ITS datasets revealed that most variation was held between S. pasumensis s.l. (with S. banmaensis) and S. umbellulata (92.31% for cpDNA; 69.78% for ITS), suggesting a high degree of genetic divergence between them. Molecular clock analysis based on ITS dataset suggested that the divergence between S. pasumensis s.l. and S. umbellulata can be dated to 8.50 Ma, probably a result of vicariant allopatric diversification associated with the uplift events of the HM. Vicariance associated with HM uplifts may also have been responsible for infraspecific differentiation in S. pasumensis. In contrast, infraspecific differentiation in S. umbellulata was most likely triggered by Quaternary glaciations. The much lower levels of gene diversity within populations of S. pasumensis compared with S. umbellulata could have resulted from both range contractions and human collection on account of its putative medicinal properties. Combining evidence from morphology, geographical distributions and molecular phylogenetic data, we recommend that S. banmaensis should be treated as a synonym of S. pasumensis which in turn, and based on the same sources of evidence, should be treated as a separate species rather than as a variety of S. umbellulata.Entities:
Keywords: Saxifraga; allopatric speciation; taxonomic suggestion; the Hengduan Mountains; vicariance
Year: 2017 PMID: 28804492 PMCID: PMC5532446 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01325
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Figure 1Geographical distribution of Saxifraga umbellulata (red spots), S. pasumensis (blue spots) and S. banmaensis (green spot). Data are based on specimens studied by us in BM, HNWP, KUN, and PE.
Population code (Pop.), sampling location, coordinates, altitude, number of investigated individuals (n), cpDNA haplotype and ITS genotype composition of investigated populations of Saxifraga umbellulata, S. pasumensis and S. banmaensis.
| CM | Cuomei, Tibet | N 28°15′26″ E 91°13′41″ | 4240 | 2 | H7(2) | G2(1); G3(1) |
| LX | Langxian, Tibet | N 29°10′12″ E 93°37′05″ | 3000 | 5 | H8(4); H9(1) | G17(5) |
| JC | Jiacha, Tibet | N 29°06′59″ E 92°39′14″ | 3210 | 1 | H10(1) | G19(1) |
| ND | Naidong, Tibet | N 28°53′22″ E 91°57′13″ | 4280 | 20 | H11(13); H12(7) | G26(16); G27(4) |
| SR | Sangri, Tibet | N 29°15′23″ E 92°23′50″ | 3040 | 14 | H11(3); H12(3); H13(5); H14(3) | G19(1); G20(4); G22(2); G23(3); G24(3); G28(1) |
| LOZ | Longzi, Tibet | N 28°19′06″ E 92°53′35″ | 3050 | 20 | H10(3); H15(17) | G18(1); G21(1); G25(1); G29(1); G30(5); G31(6); G32(2); G33(2); G34(1) |
| CY | Chaya, Tibet | N 30°41′11″ E 97°15′42″ | 4090 | 14 | H2(1); H3(13) | G4(4); G5(8); G6(2) |
| CD | Changdu, Tibet | N 31°09′20″ E 97°15′27″ | 4300 | 5 | H3(4); H4(1) | G6(4); G8(1) |
| GBJD | Gongbujiangda, Tibet | N 29°53′03″ E 93°22′14″ | 3360 | 3 | H5(3) | G10(2); G11(1) |
| LWQ | Leiwuqi, Tibet | N 31°06′40″ E 96°42′14″ | 3770 | 8 | H3(8) | G5(4); G7(2); G9(2) |
| LNZ | Linzhi, Tibet | N 29°36′46″ E 94°39′19″ | 4540 | 8 | H6(8) | G12(1); G13(1); G14(1); G15(3); G16(2) |
| BM | Banma, Qinghai | N 32°48′46″ E 100°49′28″ | 3460 | 4 | H1(4) | G1(3); G3(1) |
Figure 2Geographical distribution of sampled populations of Saxifraga umbellulata (CM, LX, JC, ND, SR, LOZ), S. pasumensis (CY, CD, GBJD, LWQ, LNZ) and S. banmaensis (BM). The frequencies of cpDNA haplotypes within each population are shown in the pie charts.
Figure 3Fifty percent strict consensus trees based on cpDNA haplotypes (A) and ITS genotypes (B) of Saxifraga pasumensis s.l. and S. umbellulata. Numbers on the branches are bootstrap values from maximum parsimony (left) and maximum likelihood (middle) analyses and posterior probabilities (right) from Bayesian inference.
Estimates of average gene diversity within populations (H), total gene diversity (H), inter-population differentiation (G) and number of substitution types (N) for cpDNA haplotypes and ITS genotypes of Saxifraga umbellulata and S. pasumensis (s.l. and s.s.).
| 0.485 | 0.964 | 0.497 | 0.808 | 0.513 | 1.000 | 0.487 | 0.650 | |
| 0.090 | 0.835 | 0.892 | 0.945 | 0.626 | 0.973 | 0.357 | 0.796 | |
| 0.109 | 0.753 | 0.856 | 0.937 | 0.651 | 0.960 | 0.322 | 0.923 | |
| Over all populations | 0.248 | 0.940 | 0.736 | 0.933 | 0.581 | 0.991 | 0.414 | 0.873 |
ns, not significant;
P < 0.05;
P < 0.01.
Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) of cpDNA haplotypes and ITS genotypes for populations of Saxifraga umbellulata and S pasumensis s.l.
| Among populations | 5 | 16.899 | 0.361 | 78.32 | 63.941 | 1.358 | 75.47 | ||
| Within populations | 56 | 5.592 | 0.100 | 21.68 | 24.724 | 0.442 | 24.53 | ||
| Total | 61 | 22.491 | 0.461 | 0.7832 | 88.665 | 1.800 | 0.7547 | ||
| Among populations | 5 | 70.110 | 2.103 | 95.29 | 230.013 | 6.809 | 87.94 | ||
| Within populations | 36 | 3.740 | 0.104 | 4.71 | 33.610 | 0.934 | 12.06 | ||
| Total | 41 | 73.849 | 2.207 | 0.9529 | 263.623 | 7.743 | 0.8794 | ||
| Among species | 1 | 749.502 | 14.696 | 92.31 | 541.366 | 9.921 | 69.78 | ||
| Among populations | 10 | 89.114 | 1.121 | 7.04 | 293.954 | 3.662 | 25.76 | ||
| Within populations | 92 | 9.475 | 0.103 | 0.65 | 58.334 | 0.634 | 4.46 | ||
| Total | 103 | 848.090 | 15.920 | 0.9935 | 893.625 | 14.217 | 0.9554 | ||
df, degrees of freedom; SS, sum of squares; VC, variance components; PV, percentage of variation; FST, fixation index;
P < 0.01.
Pairwise comparisons of F between populations of Saxifraga banmaensis, S. pasumensis s.s. and S. umbellulata, and between populations of S. pasumensis s.l. and S. umbellulata, based on cpDNA (lower triangle) and ITS (upper triangle) datasets, respectively.
| 0.7567 | 0.7942 | 0.8594 | ||
| 0.9393 | – | – | ||
| 0.9364 | – | 0.4525 | ||
| 0.9757 | – | −0.2919ns |
ns, not significant;
P < 0.01;
P < 0.001.
Neutrality tests (Tajima's D, Fu's F) and mismatch distribution analysis for the combined populations and the two species of Saxifraga umbellulata and S. pasumensis (s.l. and s.s.) based on the cpDNA dataset.
| Overall | 2.638 | 0.996 | 21.225 | 0.997 | 0.000 | 0.176 | 0.05 | 0.145 | 0.381 |
| −1.732 | 0.014 | 3.401 | 0.937 | 3.000 | 0.586 | 0.675 | 0.005 | 0.246 | |
| −0.070 | 0.509 | 3.598 | 0.927 | 0.000 | 0.386 | 0.967 | 0.328 | 0.000 | |
| 0.674 | 0.802 | 5.840 | 0.971 | 0.000 | 0.420 | 0.938 | 0.384 | 0.000 | |
SSD, sum of squared deviation under expansion model; HRI, Harpending's raggedness index.
Figure 4Mismatch distribution of Saxifraga pasumensis (s.l. and s.s) and S. umbellulata in the overall populations and in each species based on the cpDNA dataset.
Figure 5Maximum clade credibility tree and divergence time estimation based on ITS genotypes of Saxifraga pasumensis s.l. and S. umbellulata. (A) Profile of time estimation results including all outgroups. (B) Enlargement of the shadowed area, which represents ITS genotypes of S. pasumensis s.l. and S. umbellulata. Blue bars represent 95% highest posterior density. Numbers on the branches are values of posterior probabilities.
Estimation of divergence times for consistent and robust nodes of ITS genotypes of Saxifraga umbellulata and S. pasumensis s.l.
| Saxifragaceae stem | 88.09 | 78.22–92.82 |
| 69.83 | 58.14–80.29 | |
| 54.22 | 42.99–66.37 | |
| sect. | 32.40 | 24.29–41.24 |
| sect. | 19.79 | 13.41–27.92 |
| a | 8.50 | 5.01–12.72 |
| b | 6.97 | 4.10–10.97 |
| c | 4.01 | 1.93–7.01 |
| d | 1.24 | 0.48–2.40 |
| e | 0.47 | 0.06–1.14 |
| f | 0.10 | 0.00–0.42 |
| g | 0.16 | 0.00–0.80 |
| h | 0.77 | 0.17–1.82 |
| i | 3.09 | 1.47–5.46 |
| j | 1.42 | 0.68–2.53 |
Node numbers (a–j) are as those indicated in Figure .