Erratum to: Phylogeography of the sand dune ant Mycetophylax simplex along the Brazilian Atlantic Forest coast: remarkably low mtDNA diversity and shallow population structure.

Erratum

The original version of this article [1] unfortunately contained a mistake. The presentation of Tables two and three (Tables 1 and 2 here) were incorrect in the PDF and HTML versions of this article. The corrected Tables two and three (Tables 1 and 2 here) are given below.

Table 1

Genetic diversity and neutrality tests for each population and with all populations of M. simplex together

Populations	Nucleotide diversity (π) (± S.D.)	Haplotype diversity (h) (± S.D.)	Tajima's D	Fu's FS
RS1	0.00189 (0.00090)	0.667 (0.163)	−1.87333 (P = 0.0083)	−1.11562 (P = 0.1609)
RS2	0.00224 (0.00054)	0.889 (0.091)	−0.6299 (P = 0.2859)	−2.32907 (P = 0.0261)
RS3	0.00276 (0.00055)	0.933 (0.077)	−1.50661 (P = 0.0632)	−4.46904 (P = 0.0025)
SC4	0.00181 (0.00024)	0.818 (0.083)	0.43329 (P = 0.6969)	−1.02733 (P = 0.1714)
SC5	0.00268 (0.00036)	0.890 (0.060)	−1.09063 (P = 0.1463)	−2.8844 (P = 0.0302)
SC6	0.00336 (0.00039)	0.709 (0.099)	1.52257 (P = 0.9504)	1.62676 (P = 0.8143)
SC7	0.00387 (0.00064)	0.709 (0.137)	1.49895 (P = 0.9408)	0.7727 (P = 0.6626)
SC8	0.00346 (0.00042)	0.873 (0.089)	1.00501 (P = 0.8566)	−1.68615 (P = 0.1229)
SC9	0.00368 (0.00059)	0.833 (0.098)	0.92757 (P = 0.8263)	0.12678 (P = 0.4978)
NE10	0.00339 (0.00038)	0.697 (0.090)	1.68302 (P = 0.9613)	1.85074 (P = 0.8387)
All populations	0.00346 (0.00019)	0.865 (0.022)	−1.47062 (P = 0.0422)	−21.59803 (P = 0.0001)

Cardoso et al.

Cardoso et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2015 15:106 doi:10.1186/s12862-015-0383-4

Table 2

- Φ values for pairwise comparisons between population of M. simplex (lower left) and p values (upper right)

	RS1	RS2	RS3	SC4	SC5	SC6	SC7	SC8	PR9	NE10
RS1	-	0.54618	0.01228	0.04633	0.18008	0.01792	0.01594	0.04841	0.08653	0.0492
RS2	0.01856a	-	0.01683	0.00515	0.0302	0.02624	0.01465	0.04742	0.09554	0.0592
RS3	0.11411	0.13078	-	0.27888	0.02287	0.00386	0.00337	0.00485	0.01297	0.00941
SC4	0.09502	0.1619	0.01451b	-	0.08455	0.00356	0.00297	0.00752	0.01733	0.01129
SC5	0.02839	0.093	0.10675 b	0.07119b	-	0.00069	0.0004	0.00168	0.00713	0.00614
SC6	0.27381	0.24143	0.34481	0.34975	0.30795	-	0.78299	0.92516	0.6338	0.83912
SC7	0.29673	0.27747	0.36158	0.35894	0.32158	0.05903c	-	0.59489	0.43421	0.47352
SC8	0.19818	0.17864	0.28682	0.26863	0.24282	0.06991c	0.03956c	-	0.93931	0.77794
PR9	0.13621	0.12338	0.23448	0.21937	0.1883	0.06591c	0.0298c	0.08068c	-	0.94852
NE10	0.18098	0.16623	0.27856	0.27675	0.23074	0.07182c	0.03535c	0.06859c	0.0855c	-

Population names are given in the Table 1. The colors show the shallow phylogeographic structure found: southern populations (a), central-eastern population (b) and northern populations (c)

Bold values are significant at P < 0.05

Cardoso et al.

Cardoso et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2015 15:106 doi:10.1186/s12862-015-0383-4

The original article has been updated to reflect this change.