Literature DB >> 28534272

BRAF Mutation is Associated with an Improved Survival in Glioma-a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Huy Gia Vuong1, Ahmed M A Altibi2, Uyen N P Duong3, Hanh T T Ngo4, Thong Quang Pham5, Kar-Ming Fung6, Lewis Hassell6.   

Abstract

Newly emerged molecular markers in gliomas provide prognostic values beyond the capabilities of histologic classification. BRAF mutation, especially BRAF V600E, is common in a subset of gliomas and may represent a potential prognostic marker. The aim of our study is to investigate the potential use of BRAF mutations on prognosis of glioma patients. Four electronic databases were searched for potential articles, including PubMed, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, and Virtual Health Library (VHL). Data of hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were directly obtained from original papers or indirectly estimated from Kaplan Meier curve (KMC). A random effect model weighted by inverse variance method was used to calculate the pooled HR. From 705 articles, we finally included 11 articles with 1308 glioma patients for the final analysis. The overall estimates showed that BRAF V600E was associated with an improved overall survival (OS) in glioma patients (HR = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.44-0.80). Results for progression-free survival (PFS), however, were not statistically significant (HR = 1.39; 95% CI = 0.82-2.34). In subgroup analyses, BRAF V600E showed its effect in improving survival in pediatric and young adult gliomas (under 35 years) but did not have prognostic value in old adult. Additionally, BRAF V600E was only associated with a favorable prognosis in lower grade glioma. Our meta-analysis provides evidence that BRAF mutation has a favorable prognostic impact in gliomas and its prognostic value might be dependent on patient age and tumor grade. This mutation can be used as a prognostic factor in glioma but additional studies are required to clarify its prognostic value taking into account other confounding factors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRAF V600E; BRAF mutation; Glioblastoma; Glioma; Meta-analysis; Overall survival; Progression-free survival; Review

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28534272     DOI: 10.1007/s12035-017-0599-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Neurobiol        ISSN: 0893-7648            Impact factor:   5.590


  27 in total

1.  Analysis of BRAF V600E mutation in 1,320 nervous system tumors reveals high mutation frequencies in pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma, ganglioglioma and extra-cerebellar pilocytic astrocytoma.

Authors:  Genevieve Schindler; David Capper; Jochen Meyer; Wibke Janzarik; Heymut Omran; Christel Herold-Mende; Kirsten Schmieder; Pieter Wesseling; Christian Mawrin; Martin Hasselblatt; David N Louis; Andrey Korshunov; Stefan Pfister; Christian Hartmann; Werner Paulus; Guido Reifenberger; Andreas von Deimling
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 17.088

2.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  V600E BRAF mutation in pilocytic astrocytoma is associated with a more diffuse growth pattern but does not confer a more aggressive clinical behavior.

Authors:  Sergei I Bannykh; James Mirocha; Miriam Nuno; Jean Lopategui; Gokul Kandala
Journal:  Clin Neuropathol       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.368

4.  BRAF V600E mutation and its association with clinicopathological features of papillary thyroid cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Carol Li; Kathleen C Lee; Eric B Schneider; Martha A Zeiger
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 5.958

5.  Integrated genomic analysis identifies clinically relevant subtypes of glioblastoma characterized by abnormalities in PDGFRA, IDH1, EGFR, and NF1.

Authors:  Roel G W Verhaak; Katherine A Hoadley; Elizabeth Purdom; Victoria Wang; Yuan Qi; Matthew D Wilkerson; C Ryan Miller; Li Ding; Todd Golub; Jill P Mesirov; Gabriele Alexe; Michael Lawrence; Michael O'Kelly; Pablo Tamayo; Barbara A Weir; Stacey Gabriel; Wendy Winckler; Supriya Gupta; Lakshmi Jakkula; Heidi S Feiler; J Graeme Hodgson; C David James; Jann N Sarkaria; Cameron Brennan; Ari Kahn; Paul T Spellman; Richard K Wilson; Terence P Speed; Joe W Gray; Matthew Meyerson; Gad Getz; Charles M Perou; D Neil Hayes
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 6.  The prognostic value of BRAF mutation in colorectal cancer and melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gholamreza Safaee Ardekani; Seyed Mehdi Jafarnejad; Larry Tan; Ardavan Saeedi; Gang Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Analysis of KIAA1549-BRAF fusion gene expression and IDH1/IDH2 mutations in low grade pediatric astrocytomas.

Authors:  Gabriela Rampazzo Cruz; Indhira Dias Oliveira; Laís Moraes; Mário Del Giudice Paniago; Maria Teresa de Seixas Alves; Andrea Maria Capellano; Nasjla Saba-Silva; Sérgio Cavalheiro; Janete Maria Cerutti; Silvia Regina Caminada Toledo
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 4.506

8.  Mutations in IDH1, IDH2, and in the TERT promoter define clinically distinct subgroups of adult malignant gliomas.

Authors:  Patrick J Killela; Christopher J Pirozzi; Patrick Healy; Zachary J Reitman; Eric Lipp; B Ahmed Rasheed; Rui Yang; Bill H Diplas; Zhaohui Wang; Paula K Greer; Huishan Zhu; Catherine Y Wang; Austin B Carpenter; Henry Friedman; Allan H Friedman; Stephen T Keir; Jie He; Yiping He; Roger E McLendon; James E Herndon; Hai Yan; Darell D Bigner
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2014-03-30

9.  Expression level of hTERT is regulated by somatic mutation and common single nucleotide polymorphism at promoter region in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Chul-Kee Park; Se-Hoon Lee; Ji Young Kim; Ja Eun Kim; Tae Min Kim; Soon-Tae Lee; Seung Hong Choi; Sung-Hye Park; Il Han Kim
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2014-05-30

10.  A combination of TERT promoter mutation and MGMT methylation status predicts clinically relevant subgroups of newly diagnosed glioblastomas.

Authors:  Hideyuki Arita; Kai Yamasaki; Yuko Matsushita; Taishi Nakamura; Asanao Shimokawa; Hirokazu Takami; Shota Tanaka; Akitake Mukasa; Mitsuaki Shirahata; Saki Shimizu; Kaori Suzuki; Kuniaki Saito; Keiichi Kobayashi; Fumi Higuchi; Takeo Uzuka; Ryohei Otani; Kaoru Tamura; Kazutaka Sumita; Makoto Ohno; Yasuji Miyakita; Naoki Kagawa; Naoya Hashimoto; Ryusuke Hatae; Koji Yoshimoto; Naoki Shinojima; Hideo Nakamura; Yonehiro Kanemura; Yoshiko Okita; Manabu Kinoshita; Kenichi Ishibashi; Tomoko Shofuda; Yoshinori Kodama; Kanji Mori; Yusuke Tomogane; Junya Fukai; Koji Fujita; Yuzo Terakawa; Naohiro Tsuyuguchi; Shusuke Moriuchi; Masahiro Nonaka; Hiroyoshi Suzuki; Makoto Shibuya; Taketoshi Maehara; Nobuhito Saito; Motoo Nagane; Nobutaka Kawahara; Keisuke Ueki; Toshiki Yoshimine; Etsuo Miyaoka; Ryo Nishikawa; Takashi Komori; Yoshitaka Narita; Koichi Ichimura
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol Commun       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 7.578

View more
  17 in total

1.  Updates in prognostic markers for gliomas.

Authors:  Elisa Aquilanti; Julie Miller; Sandro Santagata; Daniel P Cahill; Priscilla K Brastianos
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 12.300

2.  Deconvoluting Mechanisms of Acquired Resistance to RAF Inhibitors in BRAFV600E-Mutant Human Glioma.

Authors:  Theodore Nicolaides; Jean M Mulcahy Levy; Karisa C Schreck; Andrew Morin; Guisheng Zhao; Amy N Allen; Patrick Flannery; Michael Glantz; Adam L Green; Chris Jones; Kenneth L Jones; Lindsay B Kilburn; Kellie J Nazemi; David Samuel; Bridget Sanford; David A Solomon; Jiawan Wang; Christine A Pratilas
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 3.  H3K27M-mutant diffuse midline gliomas should be further molecularly stratified: an integrated analysis of 669 patients.

Authors:  Huy Gia Vuong; Hieu Trong Le; Tam N M Ngo; Kar-Ming Fung; James D Battiste; Rene McNall-Knapp; Ian F Dunn
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 4.  Glioma-Targeted Therapeutics: Computer-Aided Drug Design Prospective.

Authors:  Preantha Poonan; Clement Agoni; Mahmoud A A Ibrahim; Mahmoud E S Soliman
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 2.371

5.  MR Imaging Characteristics and ADC Histogram Metrics for Differentiating Molecular Subgroups of Pediatric Low-Grade Gliomas.

Authors:  S Shrot; A Kerpel; J Belenky; M Lurye; C Hoffmann; M Yalon
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 4.966

6.  Identification of BRAF p. V600E-Mutant and Wild-Type by MR Imaging in Pleomorphic Xanthoastrocytoma and Anaplastic Pleomorphic Xanthoastrocytoma.

Authors:  W Huang; J Cai; N Lin; Y Xu; H Wang; Z Wu; D Kang
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  KRAS/BRAF mutations in brain arteriovenous malformations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Omid Bameri; Morteza Salarzaei; Fateme Parooie
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 1.764

8.  Introduction, comparison, and validation of Meta-Essentials: A free and simple tool for meta-analysis.

Authors:  Robert Suurmond; Henk van Rhee; Tony Hak
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 5.273

9.  Dabrafenib Treatment in a Patient with an Epithelioid Glioblastoma and BRAF V600E Mutation.

Authors:  Garry Ceccon; Jan-Michael Werner; Veronika Dunkl; Caroline Tscherpel; Gabriele Stoffels; Anna Brunn; Martina Deckert; Gereon R Fink; Norbert Galldiks
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Risk factors for tumor recurrence and progression of spindle cell oncocytoma of the pituitary gland: a systematic review and pooled analysis.

Authors:  Huy Gia Vuong; Truong Phan Xuan Nguyen; Nguyen Pham; Ian F Dunn
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 4.107

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.