BACKGROUND: There is conflicting literature regarding the association of the BRAF V600E mutation and aggressive clinicopathological features of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). Nevertheless, some propose that BRAF status be incorporated into the management of patients with PTC, specifically recommendations regarding lymph node dissection. We therefore performed a meta-analysis to examine the relationship between BRAF and clinicopathological features of PTC. METHODS: A literature search was performed within PubMed and EMBASE databases using the following Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and keywords: "braf," "mutation," "thyroid," "neoplasm(s)," "tumor," "cancer," and "carcinoma." Individual study-specific odds ratios and confidence intervals were calculated, as were Mantel-Haenszel pooled odds ratios for the combined studies. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies including 6372 patients were reviewed. BRAF mutation was associated with lymph node metastases (LNM), advanced stage, extrathyroidal extension, tumor size, male gender, multifocality, absence of capsule, classic PTC, and tall-cell variant PTC. There was no association with age or vascular invasion. Only two studies were prospective; nine included consecutive patients, whereas one included randomly selected patients; and only two included patients who had undergone routine central lymph node dissection and were thus evaluable for the presence of LNM. CONCLUSION: Meta-analysis found that BRAF mutation is associated with LNM, stage, extrathyroidal extension, tumor size, male gender, multifocality, absence of capsule, classic PTC, and tall-cell variant PTC in PTC. However, almost all studies were retrospective and only two of 32 included patients who had undergone routine central lymph node dissection, emphasizing the need for well-designed studies to appropriately examine this association before making important clinical decisions.
BACKGROUND: There is conflicting literature regarding the association of the BRAFV600E mutation and aggressive clinicopathological features of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). Nevertheless, some propose that BRAF status be incorporated into the management of patients with PTC, specifically recommendations regarding lymph node dissection. We therefore performed a meta-analysis to examine the relationship between BRAF and clinicopathological features of PTC. METHODS: A literature search was performed within PubMed and EMBASE databases using the following Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and keywords: "braf," "mutation," "thyroid," "neoplasm(s)," "tumor," "cancer," and "carcinoma." Individual study-specific odds ratios and confidence intervals were calculated, as were Mantel-Haenszel pooled odds ratios for the combined studies. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies including 6372 patients were reviewed. BRAF mutation was associated with lymph node metastases (LNM), advanced stage, extrathyroidal extension, tumor size, male gender, multifocality, absence of capsule, classic PTC, and tall-cell variant PTC. There was no association with age or vascular invasion. Only two studies were prospective; nine included consecutive patients, whereas one included randomly selected patients; and only two included patients who had undergone routine central lymph node dissection and were thus evaluable for the presence of LNM. CONCLUSION: Meta-analysis found that BRAF mutation is associated with LNM, stage, extrathyroidal extension, tumor size, male gender, multifocality, absence of capsule, classic PTC, and tall-cell variant PTC in PTC. However, almost all studies were retrospective and only two of 32 included patients who had undergone routine central lymph node dissection, emphasizing the need for well-designed studies to appropriately examine this association before making important clinical decisions.
Authors: Tarik M Elsheikh; Sylvia L Asa; John K C Chan; Ronald A DeLellis; Clara S Heffess; Virginia A LiVolsi; Bruce M Wenig Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 2.493
Authors: Christine J O'Neill; Martyn Bullock; Angela Chou; Stan B Sidhu; Leigh W Delbridge; Bruce G Robinson; Anthony J Gill; Diana L Learoyd; Roderick Clifton-Bligh; Mark S Sywak Journal: Surgery Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: D F Stroup; J A Berlin; S C Morton; I Olkin; G D Williamson; D Rennie; D Moher; B J Becker; T A Sipe; S B Thacker Journal: JAMA Date: 2000-04-19 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: V Sykorova; S Dvorakova; A Ryska; J Vcelak; E Vaclavikova; J Laco; D Kodetova; R Kodet; A Cibula; J Duskova; A Hlobilkova; J Astl; D Vesely; J Betka; J Hoch; S Smutny; J Cap; P Vlcek; Z Novak; B Bendlova Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2009-12-04 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Trevor E Angell; Melissa G Lechner; Julie K Jang; Adrian J Correa; Jonathan S LoPresti; Alan L Epstein Journal: Thyroid Date: 2014-07-15 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Carrie C Lubitz; Konstantinos P Economopoulos; Amanda C Pawlak; Kerry Lynch; Dora Dias-Santagata; William C Faquin; Peter M Sadow Journal: Thyroid Date: 2014-03-06 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Bryan R Haugen; Erik K Alexander; Keith C Bible; Gerard M Doherty; Susan J Mandel; Yuri E Nikiforov; Furio Pacini; Gregory W Randolph; Anna M Sawka; Martin Schlumberger; Kathryn G Schuff; Steven I Sherman; Julie Ann Sosa; David L Steward; R Michael Tuttle; Leonard Wartofsky Journal: Thyroid Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: F J Huang; W Y Fang; L Ye; X F Zhang; L Y Shen; R L Han; Q Wei; X C Fei; X Chen; W Q Wang; S Wang; G Ning Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 3.677