W Huang1,2, J Cai1,2, N Lin3, Y Xu1,2, H Wang1,2, Z Wu4,2, D Kang1,2. 1. From the Department of Neurosurgery (W.H., J.C., Y.X., H.W., Z.W., D.K.), The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China. 2. The First Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University (W.H., J.C., Y.X., H.W., Z.W., D.K.), Fuzhou, Fujian, China. 3. The School of Medical Technology and Engineering (N.L.), Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China. 4. From the Department of Neurosurgery (W.H., J.C., Y.X., H.W., Z.W., D.K.), The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China kirby98@126.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Compared with BRAF p. V600E wild-type pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma, BRAF p. V600E-mutant pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma showed a higher survival rate. In this study, we focused on finding preoperative MR imaging differences between BRAF p. V600E mutant and wild-type in pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma and anaplastic pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients with pathologically confirmed pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma or anaplastic pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed from January 2015 to December 2020. They were divided into a BRAF p. V600E-mutant group (including 6 pleomorphic xanthoastrocytomas and 5 anaplastic pleomorphic xanthoastrocytomas) and a wild-type group (including 8 pleomorphic xanthoastrocytomas and 4 anaplastic pleomorphic xanthoastrocytomas). The preoperative MR imaging characteristics of these groups were statistically compared. RESULTS: The wild-type pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma group presented with more aggressive conventional and advanced MR imaging features than the mutant pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma group, including greater mean maximum tumor diameter (3.1 [SD, 0.9] cm versus 1.7 [SD, 0.4 ] cm, P < .05), more frequent heterogeneous contrast enhancement of solid portions (100% versus 0%, P < .001), more obvious peritumoral edema (mean, [2.1 SD, 0.7] cm versus 0.6 [SD, 0.2] cm, P < .01), and lower mean minimum relative ADC (896 [SD, 86] versus 988 [SD, 73], P < .05) and mean relative ADC (1060 [SD, 159] versus 1248 [SD, 116], P < .05) on DWI. However, there was no significant difference in either conventional or advanced MR imaging features between the wild-type anaplastic pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma group and the mutant anaplastic pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma group. CONCLUSIONS: Neurosurgeons should carefully interpret MR images before an operation and select appropriate surgical strategies according to genotype prediction.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Compared with BRAF p. V600E wild-type pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma, BRAF p. V600E-mutant pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma showed a higher survival rate. In this study, we focused on finding preoperative MR imaging differences between BRAF p. V600E mutant and wild-type in pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma and anaplastic pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients with pathologically confirmed pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma or anaplastic pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed from January 2015 to December 2020. They were divided into a BRAF p. V600E-mutant group (including 6 pleomorphic xanthoastrocytomas and 5 anaplastic pleomorphic xanthoastrocytomas) and a wild-type group (including 8 pleomorphic xanthoastrocytomas and 4 anaplastic pleomorphic xanthoastrocytomas). The preoperative MR imaging characteristics of these groups were statistically compared. RESULTS: The wild-type pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma group presented with more aggressive conventional and advanced MR imaging features than the mutant pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma group, including greater mean maximum tumor diameter (3.1 [SD, 0.9] cm versus 1.7 [SD, 0.4 ] cm, P < .05), more frequent heterogeneous contrast enhancement of solid portions (100% versus 0%, P < .001), more obvious peritumoral edema (mean, [2.1 SD, 0.7] cm versus 0.6 [SD, 0.2] cm, P < .01), and lower mean minimum relative ADC (896 [SD, 86] versus 988 [SD, 73], P < .05) and mean relative ADC (1060 [SD, 159] versus 1248 [SD, 116], P < .05) on DWI. However, there was no significant difference in either conventional or advanced MR imaging features between the wild-type anaplastic pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma group and the mutant anaplastic pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma group. CONCLUSIONS: Neurosurgeons should carefully interpret MR images before an operation and select appropriate surgical strategies according to genotype prediction.
Authors: Genevieve Schindler; David Capper; Jochen Meyer; Wibke Janzarik; Heymut Omran; Christel Herold-Mende; Kirsten Schmieder; Pieter Wesseling; Christian Mawrin; Martin Hasselblatt; David N Louis; Andrey Korshunov; Stefan Pfister; Christian Hartmann; Werner Paulus; Guido Reifenberger; Andreas von Deimling Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2011-01-29 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: David N Louis; Pieter Wesseling; Kenneth Aldape; Daniel J Brat; David Capper; Ian A Cree; Charles Eberhart; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Maryam Fouladi; Gregory N Fuller; Caterina Giannini; Christine Haberler; Cynthia Hawkins; Takashi Komori; Johan M Kros; H K Ng; Brent A Orr; Sung-Hye Park; Werner Paulus; Arie Perry; Torsten Pietsch; Guido Reifenberger; Marc Rosenblum; Brian Rous; Felix Sahm; Chitra Sarkar; David A Solomon; Uri Tabori; Martin J van den Bent; Andreas von Deimling; Michael Weller; Valerie A White; David W Ellison Journal: Brain Pathol Date: 2020-04-19 Impact factor: 6.508
Authors: Jigisha P Thakkar; Therese A Dolecek; Craig Horbinski; Quinn T Ostrom; Donita D Lightner; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; John L Villano Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2014-07-22 Impact factor: 4.254