Literature DB >> 28533463

Signal function drives phenotypic and genetic diversity: the effects of signalling individual identity, quality or behavioural strategy.

Elizabeth A Tibbetts1, Sean P Mullen2, James Dale3.   

Abstract

Animal coloration is influenced by selection pressures associated with communication. During communication, signallers display traits that inform receivers and modify receiver behaviour in ways that benefit signallers. Here, we discuss how selection on signallers to convey different kinds of information influences animal phenotypes and genotypes. Specifically, we address the phenotypic and genetic consequences of communicating three different kinds of information: individual identity, behavioural strategy and quality. Previous work has shown signals that convey different kinds of information differ in terms of the (i) type of selection acting on signallers (e.g. directional, stabilizing, or negative frequency dependent), and (ii) developmental basis of signals (i.e. heritability, genetic architecture). These differences result in signals that convey different information having consistently different phenotypic properties, including the amount, modality and continuity of intraspecific variation. Understanding how communication influences animal phenotypes may allow researchers to quickly identify putative functions of colour variation prior to experimentation. Signals that convey different information will also have divergent evolutionary consequences. For example, signalling individual identity can increase genetic diversity, signalling quality may decrease diversity, and signalling strategy can constrain adaptation and contribute to speciation. Considering recent advances in genomic resources, our framework highlights new opportunities to resolve the evolutionary consequences of selection on communication across diverse taxa and signal types.This article is part of the themed issue 'Animal coloration: production, perception, function and application'.
© 2017 The Author(s).

Keywords:  colour polymorphism; communication; individual recognition; ornaments; sexual selection

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28533463      PMCID: PMC5444067          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  48 in total

Review 1.  Colour polymorphism and correlated characters: genetic mechanisms and evolution.

Authors:  Jeffrey S McKinnon; Michele E R Pierotti
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 6.185

2.  Condition-dependence, genotype-by-environment interactions and the lek paradox.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Katja Heubel
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-07-07       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  The (mis)concept of species recognition.

Authors:  Tamra C Mendelson; Kerry L Shaw
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 4.  The quantitative genetics of sexually selected traits, preferred traits and preference: a review and analysis of the data.

Authors:  A Y Prokuda; D A Roff
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 2.411

Review 5.  Frequency-dependent selection by predators.

Authors:  J A Allen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1988-07-06       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  Genetic architecture of fitness and nonfitness traits: empirical patterns and development of ideas.

Authors:  J Merilä; B C Sheldon
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Signaling individual identity versus quality: a model and case studies with ruffs, queleas, and house finches.

Authors:  J Dale; D B Lank; H K Reeve
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Selection for individual recognition and the evolution of polymorphic identity signals in Polistes paper wasps.

Authors:  M J Sheehan; E A Tibbetts
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 2.411

9.  Quantifying variability of avian colours: are signalling traits more variable?

Authors:  Kaspar Delhey; Anne Peters
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A supergene determines highly divergent male reproductive morphs in the ruff.

Authors:  Clemens Küpper; Michael Stocks; Judith E Risse; Natalie Dos Remedios; Lindsay L Farrell; Susan B McRae; Tawna C Morgan; Natalia Karlionova; Pavel Pinchuk; Yvonne I Verkuil; Alexander S Kitaysky; John C Wingfield; Theunis Piersma; Kai Zeng; Jon Slate; Mark Blaxter; David B Lank; Terry Burke
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  The current and future state of animal coloration research.

Authors:  John A Endler; Johanna Mappes
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Complex signals alter recognition accuracy and conspecific acceptance thresholds.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Tibbetts; Ming Liu; Emily C Laub; Sheng-Feng Shen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Testosterone and the dark ventral patch of male red deer: the role of the social environment.

Authors:  Eva de la Peña; José Martín; Isabel Barja; Juan Carranza
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2020-04-24

4.  The effect of social environment on bird song: listener-specific expression of a sexual signal.

Authors:  Mónika Jablonszky; Sándor Zsebők; Miklós Laczi; Gergely Nagy; Éva Vaskuti; László Zsolt Garamszegi
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 2.671

5.  Genetic colour variation visible for predators and conspecifics is concealed from humans in a polymorphic moth.

Authors:  Ossi Nokelainen; Juan A Galarza; Jimi Kirvesoja; Kaisa Suisto; Johanna Mappes
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 2.516

6.  The dark ventral patch: A bimodal flexible trait related to male competition in red deer.

Authors:  Juan Carranza; Eva de la Peña; Concha Mateos; Javier Pérez-González; Susana Alarcos; Jerónimo Torres-Porras; Juliana Valencia; Cristina Sánchez-Prieto; Leticia Castillo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.