Literature DB >> 32420854

Complex signals alter recognition accuracy and conspecific acceptance thresholds.

Elizabeth A Tibbetts1, Ming Liu2, Emily C Laub1, Sheng-Feng Shen2.   

Abstract

Many aspects of behaviour depend on recognition, but accurate recognition is difficult because the traits used for recognition often overlap. For example, brood parasitic birds mimic host eggs, so it is challenging for hosts to discriminate between their own eggs and parasitic eggs. Complex signals that occur in multiple sensory modalities or involve multiple signal components are thought to facilitate accurate recognition. However, we lack models that explore the effect of complex signals on the evolution of recognition systems. Here, we use individual-based models with a genetic algorithm to test how complex signals influence recognition thresholds, signaller phenotypes and receiver responses. The model has three main results. First, complex signals lead to more accurate recognition than simple signals. Second, when two signals provide different amounts of information, receivers will rely on the more informative signal to make recognition decisions and may ignore the less informative signal. As a result, the particular traits used for recognition change over evolutionary time as sender and receiver phenotypes evolve. Third, complex signals are more likely to evolve when recognition errors are high cost than when errors are low cost. Overall, redundant, complex signals are an evolutionarily stable mechanism to reduce recognition errors. This article is part of the theme issue 'Signal detection theory in recognition systems: from evolving models to experimental tests'.

Entities:  

Keywords:  multimodal signals; nest-mate recognition; recognition; redundant signals

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32420854      PMCID: PMC7331021          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  21 in total

Review 1.  Self-referent phenotype matching: theoretical considerations and empirical evidence.

Authors:  M E Hauber; P W Sherman
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 13.837

2.  Multisensory cues and multimodal communication in spiders: insights from video/audio playback studies.

Authors:  George W Uetz; J Andrew Roberts
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.808

Review 3.  Do sexual ornaments demonstrate heightened condition-dependent expression as predicted by the handicap hypothesis?

Authors:  Samuel Cotton; Kevin Fowler; Andrew Pomiankowski
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Visual modeling shows that avian host parents use multiple visual cues in rejecting parasitic eggs.

Authors:  Claire N Spottiswoode; Martin Stevens
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Issues in the classification of multimodal communication signals.

Authors:  Sarah R Partan; Peter Marler
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-05-26       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 6.  Signal function drives phenotypic and genetic diversity: the effects of signalling individual identity, quality or behavioural strategy.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Tibbetts; Sean P Mullen; James Dale
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Experimental shift in hosts' acceptance threshold of inaccurate-mimic brood parasite eggs.

Authors:  Márk E Hauber; Csaba Moskát; Miklós Bán
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Males use multiple, redundant cues to detect mating rivals.

Authors:  Amanda Bretman; James D Westmancoat; Matthew J G Gage; Tracey Chapman
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Hosts of avian brood parasites have evolved egg signatures with elevated information content.

Authors:  Eleanor M Caves; Martin Stevens; Edwin S Iversen; Claire N Spottiswoode
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 10.  The role of complex cues in social and reproductive plasticity.

Authors:  Alice A Dore; Laurin McDowall; James Rouse; Amanda Bretman; Matthew J G Gage; Tracey Chapman
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2018-07-07       Impact factor: 2.980

View more
  2 in total

1.  Signal detection, acceptance thresholds and the evolution of animal recognition systems.

Authors:  A V Suarez; H M Scharf; H K Reeve; M E Hauber
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Long-distance vocalizations of spotted hyenas contain individual, but not group, signatures.

Authors:  Kenna D S Lehmann; Frants H Jensen; Andrew S Gersick; Ariana Strandburg-Peshkin; Kay E Holekamp
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 5.530

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.