Literature DB >> 25263742

The quantitative genetics of sexually selected traits, preferred traits and preference: a review and analysis of the data.

A Y Prokuda1, D A Roff.   

Abstract

The maintenance of variation in sexually selected traits is a puzzle that has received increasing attention in the past several decades. Traits that are related to fitness, such as life-history or sexually selected traits, are expected to have low additive genetic variance (and hence, heritability) due to the rapid fixation of advantageous alleles. However, previous analyses have suggested that the heritabilities of sexually selected traits are on average higher than nonsexually selected traits. We show that the heritabilities of sexually selected traits are not significantly different from those of nonsexually selected traits overall or when separated into the three trait categories: behavioural, morphological and physiological. In contrast with previous findings, the heritability of preference is quite low (h(2) = 0.25 ± 0.06) and is in the same range as life-history traits. We distinguish preferred traits as a category of sexually selected traits and find that the heritability of the former is not significantly different than sexually selected traits overall (0.48 ± 0.04 vs. 0.46 ± 0.03). We test the hypothesis that the heritability of sexually selected traits is negatively correlated with the strength of sexual selection. As predicted, there is a significant negative correlation between the heritabilities of sexually selected traits and the strength of selection. This suggests that heritabilities do indeed decrease as sexual selection increases but sexual selection is not strong enough to cause heritabilities of sexually selected traits to deviate from the same type of nonsexually selected traits.
© 2014 European Society For Evolutionary Biology Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2014 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  heritability; mate choice; preference; preferred traits; sexual selection; sexually selected traits

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25263742     DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  11 in total

Review 1.  Signal function drives phenotypic and genetic diversity: the effects of signalling individual identity, quality or behavioural strategy.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Tibbetts; Sean P Mullen; James Dale
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Genomic evidence that a sexually selected trait captures genome-wide variation and facilitates the purging of genetic load.

Authors:  Jonathan M Parrett; Sebastian Chmielewski; Eylem Aydogdu; Aleksandra Łukasiewicz; Stephane Rombauts; Agnieszka Szubert-Kruszyńska; Wiesław Babik; Mateusz Konczal; Jacek Radwan
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 19.100

3.  Strong spatial population structure shapes the temporal coevolutionary dynamics of costly female preference and male display.

Authors:  Maximilian Tschol; Jane M Reid; Greta Bocedi
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 4.171

4.  What do orange spots reveal about male (and female) guppies? A test using correlated responses to selection.

Authors:  Magdalena Herdegen-Radwan; Silvia Cattelan; Jakub Buda; Jarosław Raubic; Jacek Radwan
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 4.171

5.  Mate choice decision rules: Trait synergisms and preference shifts.

Authors:  Nancy Tyler Burley; Elnaz Hamedani; Cole Symanski
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  The large X-effect on secondary sexual characters and the genetics of variation in sex comb tooth number in Drosophila subobscura.

Authors:  Briana E Mittleman; Brenda Manzano-Winkler; Julianne B Hall; Katharine L Korunes; Mohamed A F Noor
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Variation in signal-preference genetic correlations in Enchenopa treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae).

Authors:  Kasey D Fowler-Finn; Joseph T Kilmer; Allysa C Hallett; Rafael L Rodríguez
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  A Paradox of Genetic Variance in Epigamic Traits: Beyond "Good Genes" View of Sexual Selection.

Authors:  Jacek Radwan; Leif Engqvist; Klaus Reinhold
Journal:  Evol Biol       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 3.119

9.  Relative costs and benefits of alternative reproductive phenotypes at different temperatures - genotype-by-environment interactions in a sexually selected trait.

Authors:  Agata Plesnar-Bielak; Anna Maria Skwierzyńska; Kasper Hlebowicz; Jacek Radwan
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Sexually selected male weapon is associated with lower inbreeding load but higher sex load in the bulb mite.

Authors:  Aleksandra Łukasiewicz; Małgorzata Niśkiewicz; Jacek Radwan
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.