Literature DB >> 28533458

How camouflage works.

Sami Merilaita1, Nicholas E Scott-Samuel2, Innes C Cuthill3.   

Abstract

For camouflage to succeed, an individual has to pass undetected, unrecognized or untargeted, and hence it is the processing of visual information that needs to be deceived. Camouflage is therefore an adaptation to the perception and cognitive mechanisms of another animal. Although this has been acknowledged for a long time, there has been no unitary account of the link between visual perception and camouflage. Viewing camouflage as a suite of adaptations to reduce the signal-to-noise ratio provides the necessary common framework. We review the main processes in visual perception and how animal camouflage exploits these. We connect the function of established camouflage mechanisms to the analysis of primitive features, edges, surfaces, characteristic features and objects (a standard hierarchy of processing in vision science). Compared to the commonly used research approach based on established camouflage mechanisms, we argue that our approach based on perceptual processes targeted by camouflage has several important benefits: specifically, it enables the formulation of more precise hypotheses and addresses questions that cannot even be identified when investigating camouflage only through the classic approach based on the patterns themselves. It also promotes a shift from the appearance to the mechanistic function of animal coloration.This article is part of the themed issue 'Animal coloration: production, perception, function and application'.
© 2017 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal coloration; crypsis; defensive coloration; signal-to-noise ratio; visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28533458      PMCID: PMC5444062          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  49 in total

1.  Visual background complexity facilitates the evolution of camouflage.

Authors:  Sami Merilaita
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Dazzle coloration and prey movement.

Authors:  Martin Stevens; Daniella H Yule; Graeme D Ruxton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  From Abbott Thayer to the present day: what have we learned about the function of countershading?

Authors:  Hannah M Rowland
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Pattern recognition and active vision in chickens.

Authors:  M S Dawkins; A Woodington
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-10       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Background complexity and the detectability of camouflaged targets by birds and humans.

Authors:  Feng Xiao; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Search Image Formation in the Blue Jay (Cyanocitta cristata).

Authors:  A T Pietrewicz; A C Kamil
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-06-22       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Disruptive contrast in animal camouflage.

Authors:  Martin Stevens; Innes C Cuthill; Amy M M Windsor; Hannah J Walker
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Moving in groups: how density and unpredictable motion affect predation risk.

Authors:  Nicholas E Scott-Samuel; Gavin Holmes; Roland Baddeley; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  The role of stripe orientation in target capture success.

Authors:  Anna E Hughes; Richard S Magor-Elliott; Martin Stevens
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.172

View more
  19 in total

1.  Cultural evolution of military camouflage.

Authors:  Laszlo Talas; Roland J Baddeley; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  The current and future state of animal coloration research.

Authors:  John A Endler; Johanna Mappes
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  False holes as camouflage.

Authors:  Leah M Costello; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel; Karin Kjernsmo; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  In the corner of the eye: camouflaging motion in the peripheral visual field.

Authors:  Ioan E Smart; Innes C Cuthill; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Overcoming the detectability costs of symmetrical coloration.

Authors:  J Benito Wainwright; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Imperfect transparency and camouflage in glass frogs.

Authors:  James B Barnett; Constantine Michalis; Hannah M Anderson; Brendan L McEwen; Justin Yeager; Jonathan N Pruitt; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Predator responses to prey camouflage strategies: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  João Vitor de Alcantara Viana; Camila Vieira; Rafael Campos Duarte; Gustavo Quevedo Romero
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 5.530

8.  Optimal background matching camouflage.

Authors:  Constantine Michalis; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel; David P Gibson; Innes C Cuthill
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 9.  Finding a signal hidden among noise: how can predators overcome camouflage strategies?

Authors:  James A M Galloway; Samuel D Green; Martin Stevens; Laura A Kelley
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Seeing spots: quantifying mother-offspring similarity and assessing fitness consequences of coat pattern traits in a wild population of giraffes (Giraffa camelopardalis).

Authors:  Derek E Lee; Douglas R Cavener; Monica L Bond
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.