| Literature DB >> 28529764 |
Tomasz Gredes1, Sandra Schönitz1, Tomasz Gedrange1, Lukas Stepien2, Karol Kozak3,2, Christiane Kunert-Keil1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to investigate the in vivo effect of bioactive composites with poly(lactic acid) (PLA) or polycaprolactone (PCL) as the matrix, reinforced with bioplastic flax fibers, on the surrounding muscle tissue.Entities:
Keywords: Biocompatibility; Flax composites; Inflammation; PCL; PLA
Year: 2017 PMID: 28529764 PMCID: PMC5437395 DOI: 10.1186/s40824-017-0094-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomater Res ISSN: 1226-4601
Fig. 1Reaction of the Musculus latissimus dorsi to the different flax composite. Sample images of connective tissue capsules between muscle and material stained with hematoxylin/eosin. Ca = capsule; M = muscle; C = connective tissue; star = giant cell; the red line shows the thickness of the capsule
Fig. 2Quantification of the encapsulation of the (a) PCL and (b) PLA composites using CellF software. Indicated are mean ± standard error of n = 6–7 single preparations. Mann-Whitney U rank sum test; *P < 0.05 indicates statistically significant differences between PCL and PCL-transgen; ***P < 0.005 indicates statistically significant differences between PLA and PLA-transgen; ###P < 0.005 indicates statistically significant differences between PLA and PLA-wt
Fig. 3Immunohistological staining of CD45 in the tissue specimens four weeks after insertion of the different (a) PCL and (b) PLA composites
Fig. 4Quantification of the CD45 expression using the software CellF after insertion of the different (a) PCL and (b) PLA composites. Indicated are mean ± standard error of n = 6–7 single preparations. Mann-Whitney U rank sum test; *P < 0.05 indicates statistically significant differences between control and composite; #P < 0.05 indicates statistically significant differences between PCL and flax composite
Fig. 5Immunohistological staining of caveolin-1 in the tissue specimens four weeks after insertion of the different (a) PCL and (b) PLA composites
Fig. 6Quantification of the caveolin-1 expression using CellF software after insertion of the different (a) PCL and (b) PLA composites. Indicated are mean ± standard error of n = 6–7 single preparations. Mann-Whitney U rank sum test; *P < 0.05 indicates statistically significant differences between control and PLA-wt; #P < 0.05 indicates statistically significant differences between PLA and PLA-wt