Literature DB >> 15559850

Differential degradation rates in vivo and in vitro of biocompatible poly(lactic acid) and poly(glycolic acid) homo- and co-polymers for a polymeric drug-delivery microchip.

Amy C R Grayson1, Gabriela Voskerician, Aaron Lynn, James M Anderson, Michael J Cima, Robert Langer.   

Abstract

The biocompatibility and biodegradation rate of component materials are critical when designing a drug-delivery device. The degradation products and rate of degradation may play important roles in determining the local cellular response to the implanted material. In this study, we investigated the biocompatibility and relative biodegradation rates of PLA, PGA and two poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) polymers of 50:50 mol ratio, thin-film component materials of a drug-delivery microchip developed in our laboratory. The in vivo biocompatibility and both in vivo and in vitro degradation of these materials were characterized using several techniques. Total leukocyte concentration measurements showed normal acute and chronic inflammatory responses to the PGA and low-molecular-weight PLGA that resolved by 21 days, while the normal inflammatory responses to the PLA and high-molecular-weight PLGA were resolved but at slower rates up to 21 days. These results were paralleled by thickness measurements of fibrous capsules surrounding the implants, which showed greater maturation of the capsules for the more rapidly degrading materials after 21 days, but less mature capsules of sustained thicknesses for the PLA and high-molecular-weight PLGA up to 49 days. Gel-permeation chromatography of residual polymer samples confirmed classification of the materials as rapidly or slowly degrading. These materials showed thinner fibrous capsules than have been reported for other materials by our laboratory and have suitable biocompatibility and biodegradation rates for an implantable drug-delivery device.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15559850     DOI: 10.1163/1568562041959991

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomater Sci Polym Ed        ISSN: 0920-5063            Impact factor:   3.517


  30 in total

Review 1.  Microfabrication technologies for oral drug delivery.

Authors:  Shilpa Sant; Sarah L Tao; Omar Z Fisher; Qiaobing Xu; Nicholas A Peppas; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2011-12-04       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 2.  Progress in material design for biomedical applications.

Authors:  Mark W Tibbitt; Christopher B Rodell; Jason A Burdick; Kristi S Anseth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Osteochondral interface regeneration of the rabbit knee with macroscopic gradients of bioactive signals.

Authors:  Nathan H Dormer; Milind Singh; Liang Zhao; Neethu Mohan; Cory J Berkland; Michael S Detamore
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 4.  Application of micro- and nano-electromechanical devices to drug delivery.

Authors:  Mark Staples; Karen Daniel; Michael J Cima; Robert Langer
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 5.  Drug delivery systems in urology--getting "smarter".

Authors:  Omid C Farokhzad; Jordan D Dimitrakov; Jeffrey M Karp; Ali Khademhosseini; Michael R Freeman; Robert Langer
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Degradable PLGA scaffolds with basic fibroblast growth factor: experimental studies in myocardial revascularization.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Xiao-Cheng Liu; Jian Zhao; Xiang-Rong Kong; Rong-Fang Shi; Xiao-Bin Zhao; Cun-Xian Song; Tian-Jun Liu; Feng Lu
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2009

7.  Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Delivery via Nanofibrous Scaffolds for Soft-Tissue Repair.

Authors:  Qiming Jin; Peter X Ma; William V Giannobile
Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 2.347

Review 8.  Silicon micro- and nanofabrication for medicine.

Authors:  Daniel Fine; Alessandro Grattoni; Randy Goodall; Shyam S Bansal; Ciro Chiappini; Sharath Hosali; Anne L van de Ven; Srimeenkashi Srinivasan; Xuewu Liu; Biana Godin; Louis Brousseau; Iman K Yazdi; Joseph Fernandez-Moure; Ennio Tasciotti; Hung-Jen Wu; Ye Hu; Steve Klemm; Mauro Ferrari
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 9.933

9.  In vitro construction of scaffold-free cylindrical cartilage using cell sheet-based tissue engineering.

Authors:  Gakuto Tani; Noriaki Usui; Masafumi Kamiyama; Takaharu Oue; Masahiro Fukuzawa
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 1.827

10.  Retinal tissue engineering using mouse retinal progenitor cells and a novel biodegradable, thin-film poly(e-caprolactone) nanowire scaffold.

Authors:  Stephen Redenti; Sarah Tao; Jing Yang; Ping Gu; Henry Klassen; Sunita Saigal; Tejal Desai; Michael J Young
Journal:  J Ocul Biol Dis Infor       Date:  2008-05-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.