Literature DB >> 24559461

Is in vivo manual palpation for thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation reliable?

Miriam L Donohue1, Ross R Moquin, Amit Singla, Blair Calancie.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Previous reports on the accuracy of manual palpation for thoracic pedicle screw placement have been restricted to cadaveric studies. Authors of the present novel study assessed the accuracy of manual palpation for the detection of medial and lateral pedicle breaches during thoracic spine surgery in living adult humans.
METHODS: Pedicle tracks were created freehand and manually palpated using a ball-tipped probe. Postoperative CT scans of all implanted thoracic and L-1 screws were evaluated with respect to screw position and the pedicle wall.
RESULTS: Five hundred twenty-five pedicle track/screw placements were compared. There were 21 pedicles with medial breaches measuring ≥ 2 mm. The surgeon correctly identified only 4 of these pedicle tracks as having a medial breach. The surgeon correctly identified 17 of 128 pedicles with a significant (≥ 2 mm) lateral breach. One hundred two screw placements had no measurable breach in any direction (medial, lateral, or foraminal). The surgeon correctly identified 98% of these ideally placed screws.
CONCLUSIONS: In this real-time study of thoracic pedicle screw placement, the accuracy of manual palpation for detecting medial or lateral breaches that were ≥ 2 mm was disturbingly low. These findings are consistent with those in recent cadaveric evaluations of palpation accuracy and point to the critical need for more reliable alternative methods to assess pedicle integrity during the placement of thoracic pedicle screws for spine instrumentation surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24559461     DOI: 10.3171/2014.1.SPINE13197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  4 in total

1.  Pedicle screw insertion accuracy in terms of breach and reposition using a new intraoperative cone beam computed tomography imaging technique and evaluation of the factors associated with these parameters of accuracy: a series of 695 screws.

Authors:  Virginie Cordemans; Ludovic Kaminski; Xavier Banse; Bernard G Francq; Christine Detrembleur; Olivier Cartiaux
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Accuracy of a new intraoperative cone beam CT imaging technique (Artis zeego II) compared to postoperative CT scan for assessment of pedicle screws placement and breaches detection.

Authors:  Virginie Cordemans; Ludovic Kaminski; Xavier Banse; Bernard G Francq; Olivier Cartiaux
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-05-20       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Feasibility of Endoscopic Inspection of Pedicle Wall Integrity in a Live Surgery Model.

Authors:  Kristen Radcliff; Harvey Smith; Bobby Kalantar; Robert Isaacs; Barrett Woods; Alexander R Vaccaro; James Brannon
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03

4.  Force quantification and simulation of pedicle screw tract palpation using direct visuo-haptic volume rendering.

Authors:  Esther I Zoller; Balázs Faludi; Nicolas Gerig; Gregory F Jost; Philippe C Cattin; Georg Rauter
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 2.924

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.