Literature DB >> 28528388

Fertility-sparing for young patients with gynecologic cancer: How MRI can guide patient selection prior to conservative management.

Sinead H McEvoy1,2, Stephanie Nougaret3,4,5, Nadeem R Abu-Rustum6, Hebert Alberto Vargas3, Elizabeth A Sadowski7, Christine O Menias8, Fuki Shitano3,9, Shinya Fujii10, Ramon E Sosa3, Joanna G Escalon3,11, Evis Sala3, Yulia Lakhman3.   

Abstract

Historically, cancer treatment has emphasized measures for the "cure" regardless of the long-term consequences. Advances in cancer detection and treatment have resulted in improved outcomes bringing to the fore various quality of life considerations including future fertility. For many young cancer patients, fertility preservation is now an integral component of clinical decision-making and treatment design. Optimal fertility-sparing options for young patients with gynecologic cancer are influenced by patient age, primary cancer, treatment regimens, and patient preferences. Possible approaches include embryo or oocyte cryopreservation, ovarian transposition, conservative surgery, and conservative medical treatment to delay radical surgery. These may be used alone or in combination to maximize fertility preservation. Awareness of the various fertility-sparing options, eligibility criteria, and the central role of magnetic resonance imaging in the proper selection of patients will enable radiologists to produce complete clinically relevant imaging reports and serve as effective consultants to referring clinicians. Knowledge of the potential imaging pitfalls is essential to avoid misinterpretation and guide appropriate management.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Fertility preservation; Gynecologic cancer; Magnetic resonance imaging; Oncofertility

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28528388      PMCID: PMC5857967          DOI: 10.1007/s00261-017-1179-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)


  145 in total

1.  Fertility-sparing surgery in early-stage cervical cancer: indications and applications.

Authors:  Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Yukio Sonoda
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 11.908

2.  Predicting age of ovarian failure after radiation to a field that includes the ovaries.

Authors:  W Hamish B Wallace; Angela B Thomson; Frank Saran; Tom W Kelsey
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  The performance of magnetic resonance imaging in early cervical carcinoma: a long-term experience.

Authors:  A Sahdev; S A Sohaib; A E T Wenaden; J H Shepherd; R H Reznek
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 3.437

4.  A fertility-sparing alternative to radical hysterectomy: how many patients may be eligible?

Authors:  Yukio Sonoda; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Mary L Gemignani; Dennis S Chi; Carol L Brown; Elizabeth A Poynor; Richard R Barakat
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 5.  Pearls and pitfalls in MRI of gynecologic malignancy with diffusion-weighted technique.

Authors:  Stephanie Nougaret; Sree Harsha Tirumani; Helen Addley; Himanshu Pandey; Evis Sala; Caroline Reinhold
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs. no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Pierluigi Benedetti Panici; Stefano Basile; Francesco Maneschi; Andrea Alberto Lissoni; Mauro Signorelli; Giovanni Scambia; Roberto Angioli; Saverio Tateo; Giorgia Mangili; Dionyssios Katsaros; Gaetano Garozzo; Elio Campagnutta; Nicoletta Donadello; Stefano Greggi; Mauro Melpignano; Francesco Raspagliesi; Nicola Ragni; Gennaro Cormio; Roberto Grassi; Massimo Franchi; Diana Giannarelli; Roldano Fossati; Valter Torri; Mariangela Amoroso; Clara Crocè; Costantino Mangioni
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 7.  Oncological outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery for cervical cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Enrica Bentivegna; Sebastien Gouy; Amandine Maulard; Cyrus Chargari; Alexandra Leary; Philippe Morice
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.

Authors:  Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rajesh Dikshit; Sultan Eser; Colin Mathers; Marise Rebelo; Donald Maxwell Parkin; David Forman; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 9.  Practical guidance for applying the ADNEX model from the IOTA group to discriminate between different subtypes of adnexal tumors.

Authors:  B Van Calster; K Van Hoorde; W Froyman; J Kaijser; L Wynants; C Landolfo; C Anthoulakis; I Vergote; T Bourne; D Timmerman
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2015

10.  Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomised study.

Authors:  H Kitchener; A M C Swart; Q Qian; C Amos; M K B Parmar
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  O-RADS MRI Risk Stratification System: Guide for Assessing Adnexal Lesions from the ACR O-RADS Committee.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Sadowski; Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara; Andrea Rockall; Katherine E Maturen; Rosemarie Forstner; Priyanka Jha; Stephanie Nougaret; Evan S Siegelman; Caroline Reinhold
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Ovary: MRI characterisation and O-RADS MRI.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Sadowski; Katherine E Maturen; Andrea Rockall; Caroline Reinhold; Helen Addley; Priyanka Jha; Nishat Bharwani; Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 3.629

Review 3.  Implications of the new FIGO staging and the role of imaging in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Aki Kido; Yuji Nakamoto
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.629

4.  Outcomes of ovarian transposition in cervical cancer; an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alexandros Laios; Mohamed Otify; Argyro Papadopoulou; Ioannis D Gallos; Thomas Ind
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 5.  [Adnexal Masses: Clinical Application of Multiparametric MR Imaging & O-RADS MRI].

Authors:  So Young Eom; Sung Eun Rha
Journal:  Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi       Date:  2021-09-15

6.  The role of MRI in cervical cancer > 2 cm (FIGO stage IB2-IIA1) conservatively treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by conization: a pilot study.

Authors:  Luca Russo; Benedetta Gui; Maura Miccò; Camilla Panico; Rosa De Vincenzo; Francesco Fanfani; Giovanni Scambia; Riccardo Manfredi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 6.313

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.