Literature DB >> 17309561

The performance of magnetic resonance imaging in early cervical carcinoma: a long-term experience.

A Sahdev1, S A Sohaib, A E T Wenaden, J H Shepherd, R H Reznek.   

Abstract

We report our long-term experience of performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in localizing cervical tumor, assessing tumor size, staging, and lymph node infiltration in patients with early cervical cancer. MRI of 150 patients with early carcinoma between 1995-2005 was retrospectively reviewed. Tumor location, size, tumor distance from internal os, parametrial invasion, myometrial invasion, lymph node size, and location were documented. All patients underwent surgery, pelvic lymphadenectomy, and histological correlation of MRI findings. For staging, MRI and histopathology had kappa value of 0.89. For parametrial invasion, MRI had specificity, negative predictive value (NPV) of 97% and 100%, respectively. For tumor size, MRI and histology had mean difference of -0.9 mm with 95% limits of agreement between -12.6 to +13 mm. In tumors greater than 10 mm, mean difference was 0.3 mm and limits of agreement were -7.5 to +7.9 mm. For internal os involvement sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and NPV were 90%, 98%, 86%, 98%. respectively. For myometrial invasion sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and PPV were 100%, 99%, 88%, 100%, respectively. Incidence of nodal metastases was 2.9%. On a per-patient basis, sensitivity, specificity for nodal involvement was 37% and 92% and on node-by-node basis, sensitivity and specificity of MRI was 27% and 99%, respectively. Our study confirms MRI is highly accurate in localizing cervical tumor, excluding parametrial invasion, confirming myometrial and internal os invasion. MRI is therefore useful in selecting patients for surgery and mandatory in patients for fertility-preserving surgery. Using accepted size criteria for nodal involvement, MRI is insensitive and currently will not avoid need for pelvic lymphadenectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17309561     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.00829.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  23 in total

Review 1.  Fertility-sparing for young patients with gynecologic cancer: How MRI can guide patient selection prior to conservative management.

Authors:  Sinead H McEvoy; Stephanie Nougaret; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Elizabeth A Sadowski; Christine O Menias; Fuki Shitano; Shinya Fujii; Ramon E Sosa; Joanna G Escalon; Evis Sala; Yulia Lakhman
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2017-10

2.  Is MRI helpful in assessing the distance of the tumour from the internal os in patients with cervical cancer below FIGO Stage IB2?

Authors:  P R Bhosale; R B Iyer; P Ramalingam; K M Schmeler; W Wei; R L Bassett; P T Ramirez; M Frumovitz
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 2.350

Review 3.  [Uterine cervical cancer : preoperative staging with magnetic resonance imaging].

Authors:  F Collettini; B Hamm
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 4.  Primary vaginal cancer: role of MRI in diagnosis, staging and treatment.

Authors:  C S Gardner; J Sunil; A H Klopp; C E Devine; T Sagebiel; C Viswanathan; P R Bhosale
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Correlation between tumor measurement on Computed Tomography and resected specimen size in lung adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Katharine Lampen-Sachar; Binsheng Zhao; Junting Zheng; Chaya S Moskowitz; Lawrence H Schwartz; Maureen F Zakowski; Naiyer A Rizvi; Mark G Kris; Michelle S Ginsberg
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2011-09-03       Impact factor: 5.705

6.  Stage IB1 cervical cancer: role of preoperative MR imaging in selection of patients for fertility-sparing radical trachelectomy.

Authors:  Yulia Lakhman; Oguz Akin; Kay J Park; Debra M Sarasohn; Junting Zheng; Debra A Goldman; Michael J Sohn; Chaya S Moskowitz; Yukio Sonoda; Hedvig Hricak; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Second-Opinion Interpretations of Gynecologic Oncologic MRI Examinations by Sub-Specialized Radiologists Influence Patient Care.

Authors:  Yulia Lakhman; Melvin D'Anastasi; Maura Miccò; Chiara Scelzo; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Stephanie Nougaret; Ramon E Sosa; Dennis S Chi; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Hedvig Hricak; Evis Sala
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Imaging of endometrial and cervical cancer.

Authors:  Shilpa Patel; Sidath H Liyanage; Anju Sahdev; Andrea G Rockall; Rodney H Reznek
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2010-09-28

9.  The role of MRI in cervical cancer > 2 cm (FIGO stage IB2-IIA1) conservatively treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by conization: a pilot study.

Authors:  Luca Russo; Benedetta Gui; Maura Miccò; Camilla Panico; Rosa De Vincenzo; Francesco Fanfani; Giovanni Scambia; Riccardo Manfredi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 6.313

10.  Uterine cervical malignancy: diagnostic accuracy of MRI with histopathologic correlation.

Authors:  Mohammed A Shweel; Enas A Abdel-Gawad; Ehab Ali Abdel-Gawad; Hosny S Abdelghany; Alshimaa M Abdel-Rahman; Emad M Ibrahim
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2012-07-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.