Literature DB >> 28526698

Improving Response in Genomic Selection with a Population-Based Selection Strategy: Optimal Population Value Selection.

Matthew Goiffon1, Aaron Kusmec2, Lizhi Wang3, Guiping Hu1, Patrick S Schnable2.   

Abstract

Genomic selection (GS) identifies individuals for inclusion in breeding programs based on the sum of their estimated marker effects or genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs). Due to significant correlation between GEBVs and true breeding values, this has resulted in enhanced rates of genetic gain as compared to traditional methods of selection. Three extensions to GS, weighted genomic selection (WGS), optimal haploid value (OHV) selection, and genotype building (GB) selection have been proposed to improve long-term response, and to facilitate the efficient development of doubled haploids. In separate simulation studies, these methods were shown to outperform GS under various assumptions. However, further potential for improvement exists. In this paper, optimal population value (OPV) selection is introduced as selection based on the maximum possible haploid value in a subset of the population. Instead of evaluating the breeding merit of individuals as in GS, WGS, and OHV selection, the proposed method evaluates the breeding merit of a set of individuals as in GB. After testing these selection methods extensively, OPV and GB selection were found to achieve greater responses than GS, WGS, and OHV, with OPV outperforming GB across most percentiles. These results suggest a new paradigm for selection methods in which an individual's value is dependent upon its complementarity with others.
Copyright © 2017 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GenPred; genetic gain; genomic selection; optimal haploid value; optimal population value; population-based selection; shared data resource

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28526698      PMCID: PMC5500159          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.116.197103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  10 in total

1.  Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps.

Authors:  T H Meuwissen; B J Hayes; M E Goddard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Use of haplotypes to estimate Mendelian sampling effects and selection limits.

Authors:  J B Cole; P M VanRaden
Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 2.380

3.  Genetic design and statistical power of nested association mapping in maize.

Authors:  Jianming Yu; James B Holland; Michael D McMullen; Edward S Buckler
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  A unified approach to genotype imputation and haplotype-phase inference for large data sets of trios and unrelated individuals.

Authors:  Brian L Browning; Sharon R Browning
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response.

Authors:  Mike Goddard
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  Selection on Optimal Haploid Value Increases Genetic Gain and Preserves More Genetic Diversity Relative to Genomic Selection.

Authors:  Hans D Daetwyler; Matthew J Hayden; German C Spangenberg; Ben J Hayes
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The Predicted Cross Value for Genetic Introgression of Multiple Alleles.

Authors:  Ye Han; John N Cameron; Lizhi Wang; William D Beavis
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Long-term selection strategies for complex traits using high-density genetic markers.

Authors:  K E Kemper; P J Bowman; J E Pryce; B J Hayes; M E Goddard
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.034

9.  Dynamics of long-term genomic selection.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Jannink
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Genetic control of morphometric diversity in the maize shoot apical meristem.

Authors:  Samuel Leiboff; Xianran Li; Heng-Cheng Hu; Natalie Todt; Jinliang Yang; Xiao Li; Xiaoqing Yu; Gary J Muehlbauer; Marja C P Timmermans; Jianming Yu; Patrick S Schnable; Michael J Scanlon
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 14.919

  10 in total
  14 in total

1.  Genetic Gain Increases by Applying the Usefulness Criterion with Improved Variance Prediction in Selection of Crosses.

Authors:  Christina Lehermeier; Simon Teyssèdre; Chris-Carolin Schön
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Breeding Top Genotypes and Accelerating Response to Recurrent Selection by Selecting Parents with Greater Gametic Variance.

Authors:  Piter Bijma; Yvonne C J Wientjes; Mario P L Calus
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Multi-trait Genomic Selection Methods for Crop Improvement.

Authors:  Saba Moeinizade; Aaron Kusmec; Guiping Hu; Lizhi Wang; Patrick S Schnable
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Genomic Prediction of Complex Traits in an Allogamous Annual Crop: The Case of Maize Single-Cross Hybrids.

Authors:  Isadora Cristina Martins Oliveira; Arthur Bernardeli; José Henrique Soler Guilhen; Maria Marta Pastina
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

5.  The L-shaped selection algorithm for multitrait genomic selection.

Authors:  Fatemeh Amini; Guiping Hu; Lizhi Wang; Ruoyu Wu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.402

6.  Genomic prediction with a maize collaborative panel: identification of genetic resources to enrich elite breeding programs.

Authors:  Antoine Allier; Simon Teyssèdre; Christina Lehermeier; Alain Charcosset; Laurence Moreau
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 7.  Reciprocal recurrent genomic selection: an attractive tool to leverage hybrid wheat breeding.

Authors:  Maximilian Rembe; Yusheng Zhao; Yong Jiang; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  tGBS® genotyping-by-sequencing enables reliable genotyping of heterozygous loci.

Authors:  Alina Ott; Sanzhen Liu; James C Schnable; Cheng-Ting 'Eddy' Yeh; Kai-Sin Wang; Patrick S Schnable
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Selection on Expected Maximum Haploid Breeding Values Can Increase Genetic Gain in Recurrent Genomic Selection.

Authors:  Dominik Müller; Pascal Schopp; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Optimizing Selection and Mating in Genomic Selection with a Look-Ahead Approach: An Operations Research Framework.

Authors:  Saba Moeinizade; Guiping Hu; Lizhi Wang; Patrick S Schnable
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 3.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.