Literature DB >> 35482523

The L-shaped selection algorithm for multitrait genomic selection.

Fatemeh Amini1, Guiping Hu1,2, Lizhi Wang1, Ruoyu Wu3.   

Abstract

Selecting for multiple traits as opposed to a single trait has become increasingly important in genomic selection. As one of the most popular approaches to multitrait genomic selection, index selection uses a weighted average of all traits as a single breeding objective. Although intuitive and effective, index selection is not only numerically sensitive but also structurally incapable of finding certain optimal breeding parents. This paper proposes a new selection method for multitrait genomic selection, the L-shaped selection, which addresses the limitations of index selection by normalizing the trait values and using an L-shaped objective function to find optimal breeding parents. This algorithm has been proven to be able to find any Pareto optimal solution with appropriate weights. Two performance metrics have also been defined to quantify multitrait genomic selection algorithms with respect to their ability to accelerate genetic gain and preserve genetic diversity. Computational experiments were conducted to demonstrate the improved performance of L-shaped selection over-index selection.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Genetics Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  L-shaped selection; Pareto optimality; genetic diversity; index selection; multitrait genomic selection

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35482523      PMCID: PMC9252277          DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyac069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.402


  15 in total

1.  The Genetic Basis for Constructing Selection Indexes.

Authors:  L N Hazel
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1943-11       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  A unified approach to genotype imputation and haplotype-phase inference for large data sets of trios and unrelated individuals.

Authors:  Brian L Browning; Sharon R Browning
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Multiple-trait genomic selection methods increase genetic value prediction accuracy.

Authors:  Yi Jia; Jean-Luc Jannink
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Genomic selection: genome-wide prediction in plant improvement.

Authors:  Zeratsion Abera Desta; Rodomiro Ortiz
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 18.313

5.  Multi-trait Genomic Selection Methods for Crop Improvement.

Authors:  Saba Moeinizade; Aaron Kusmec; Guiping Hu; Lizhi Wang; Patrick S Schnable
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Accuracy of genotypic value predictions for marker-based selection in biparental plant populations.

Authors:  Robenzon E Lorenzana; Rex Bernardo
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Canopy Temperature and Vegetation Indices from High-Throughput Phenotyping Improve Accuracy of Pedigree and Genomic Selection for Grain Yield in Wheat.

Authors:  Jessica Rutkoski; Jesse Poland; Suchismita Mondal; Enrique Autrique; Lorena González Pérez; José Crossa; Matthew Reynolds; Ravi Singh
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 3.154

8.  Regularized selection indices for breeding value prediction using hyper-spectral image data.

Authors:  Marco Lopez-Cruz; Eric Olson; Gabriel Rovere; Jose Crossa; Susanne Dreisigacker; Suchismita Mondal; Ravi Singh; Gustavo de Los Campos
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The look ahead trace back optimizer for genomic selection under transparent and opaque simulators.

Authors:  Fatemeh Amini; Felipe Restrepo Franco; Guiping Hu; Lizhi Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Genetic control of morphometric diversity in the maize shoot apical meristem.

Authors:  Samuel Leiboff; Xianran Li; Heng-Cheng Hu; Natalie Todt; Jinliang Yang; Xiao Li; Xiaoqing Yu; Gary J Muehlbauer; Marja C P Timmermans; Jianming Yu; Patrick S Schnable; Michael J Scanlon
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.