Self-assembled biomaterials are an important class of materials that can be injected and formed in situ. However, they often are not able to meet the mechanical properties necessary for many biological applications, losing mechanical properties at low strains. We synthesized hybrid hydrogels consisting of a poly(γ-glutamic acid) polymer network physically cross-linked via grafted self-assembling β-sheet peptides to provide non-covalent cross-linking through β-sheet assembly, reinforced with a polymer backbone to improve strain stability. By altering the β-sheet peptide graft density and concentration, we can tailor the mechanical properties of the hydrogels over an order of magnitude range of 10-200 kPa, which is in the region of many soft tissues. Also, due to the ability of the non-covalent β-sheet cross-links to reassemble, the hydrogels can self-heal after being strained to failure, in most cases recovering all of their original storage moduli. Using a combination of spectroscopic techniques, we were able to probe the secondary structure of the materials and verify the presence of β-sheets within the hybrid hydrogels. Since the polymer backbone requires less than a 15% functionalization of its repeating units with β-sheet peptides to form a hydrogel, it can easily be modified further to incorporate specific biological epitopes. This self-healing polymer-β-sheet peptide hybrid hydrogel with tailorable mechanical properties is a promising platform for future tissue-engineering scaffolds and biomedical applications.
Self-assembled biomaterials are an important class of materials that can be injected and formed in situ. However, they often are not able to meet the mechanical properties necessary for many biological applications, losing mechanical properties at low strains. We synthesized hybrid hydrogels consisting of a poly(γ-glutamic acid) polymer network physically cross-linked via grafted self-assembling β-sheet peptides to provide non-covalent cross-linking through β-sheet assembly, reinforced with a polymer backbone to improve strain stability. By altering the β-sheet peptide graft density and concentration, we can tailor the mechanical properties of the hydrogels over an order of magnitude range of 10-200 kPa, which is in the region of many soft tissues. Also, due to the ability of the non-covalent β-sheet cross-links to reassemble, the hydrogels can self-heal after being strained to failure, in most cases recovering all of their original storage moduli. Using a combination of spectroscopic techniques, we were able to probe the secondary structure of the materials and verify the presence of β-sheets within the hybrid hydrogels. Since the polymer backbone requires less than a 15% functionalization of its repeating units with β-sheet peptides to form a hydrogel, it can easily be modified further to incorporate specific biological epitopes. This self-healing polymer-β-sheet peptide hybrid hydrogel with tailorable mechanical properties is a promising platform for future tissue-engineering scaffolds and biomedical applications.
Tissue-engineering
strategies commonly utilize a biomimetic scaffold
material that provides mechanical support for cells and allows for
functionalization with bioactive moieties that elicit a desired cellular
response.[1] These scaffolds are typically
made from soft materials, such as polymer or peptide hydrogels, which
encapsulate cells and allow for cell migration and nutrient diffusion.
Covalently cross-linked polymer hydrogels generally have more robust
mechanical properties, with weak gels having moduli below a kilopascal
to tough hydrogels having moduli of several megapascals. These properties
can be tailored through concentration, cross-linking density, or molecular
architecture.[2,3] However, these hydrogels are often
made of non-natural monomers and either require surgical implantation
or typically need to be polymerized or cross-linked in situ when injected. Self-assembled hydrogels are most often made from
peptides and have some advantages over many covalently cross-linked
hydrogels. They can often be injected, and gelation is typically induced
by ions present in physiological solutions or added separately. Since
their assembly is governed through non-covalent interactions, these
can recover over 90% of their mechanical properties after being strained
to failure.[4] They also have advantages
in biocompatibility, degrading into natural amino acids, and multiple
bioactive epitopes can be easily incorporated.[5−8] However, in physiological conditions
they suffer from low failure strains, which can be problematic for
applications which require resistance to strain, and generally cells
can exert significant force on their local environment.[9]Polymers conjugated with peptides are widely
used in tissue-engineering
applications.[10,11] In most cases the peptide sequences
bind to cells to promote a specific biological response, such as cell
adhesion[12] or receptor signaling.[13] However, peptides can also be utilized to modify
the mechanical properties of hydrogels through non-covalent interactions.
This can create a hybrid hydrogel that has the strain-resistance of
a polymer hydrogel but can recover and assemble like a peptide hydrogel.
Non-covalent interactions have been successfully used to provide added
functionality and responsiveness to polymer networks, especially in
shear-thinning and the ability to self-heal.[14−19] Many cells in living tissues experience a wide range of mechanical
environments present under physiological conditions, adding complexity
when engineering a scaffold for such tissues. One way to approach
this engineering problem would be to develop a scaffold that can self-heal,
providing a recovery in mechanical properties following an exposure
to large strains. In previous work, peptides designed to guide the
organization of polymer networks through peptide self-assembly have
included coiled-coils[20−22] and β-sheets.[23−25] Specifically the self-assembly
of β-sheets motifs have been utilized in block copolymers[26−28] as nanofiber-forming grafts to synthetic polymer networks[29,30] and as cross-links in hydrogels.[31−34] We hypothesized that the use
of non-covalent β-sheet peptide cross-links would provide the
necessary driving force to reassemble polymer chains following large
strains. Furthermore, since the strength of the non-covalent cross-links
is dependent on the composition of the peptide sequence, we could
tailor the properties of the hydrogel by changing both the number
of grafted peptides and the strength of the individual interactions.Here we present a biodegradable polymer–peptide hydrogel
consisting of a poly(γ-glutamic acid) (γ-PGA) polymer
network physically cross-linked via conjugated β-sheet peptide
sequences (Figure A). γ-PGA is a naturally occurring homopolypeptide that is
produced by bacteria and archaea and is enzymatically degradable,
highly biocompatible, and water soluble.[35,36] In previous work we have shown that derivatives of γ-PGA can
be used to create tissue-engineering scaffolds that promote cell adhesion
and support osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells.[37] The ability to tune the mechanical properties
of tissue-engineering scaffolds is an important design feature as
cellular behavior has been found to be heavily influenced by the mechanical
properties of the surrounding environment.[38] In our system we alter the concentration of the hybrid peptide–polymer,
the grafting density of the β-sheet peptide, and the ratio of
the covalently coupled versus uncoupled peptide to tailor the mechanical
properties of the gel. We also evaluate the hydrogel’s response
to cyclic loading and their recovery following the application of
high strain environments. We utilized circular dichroism (CD), Fourier
transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and thioflavin T
(ThT) binding techniques to probe the secondary structure in the polymer–peptide
hybrid hydrogels. Following β-sheet conjugation, 85% or more
of the carboxylic groups are available for further modifications,
such as the cell adhesion peptide Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD), bioactive epitopes,
or signaling moieties.
Figure 1
(A) Schematic of the azide-modified self-assembling β-sheet
peptide (N3-D2I4D2) and
alkyne-functionalized γ-PGA biopolymer. Synthesis and assembly
of the hybrid hydrogel through mixing of azido-peptide and alkyne-polymer
was followed by the copper-catalyzed click reaction (B) and assembly
of β-sheets, inducing hydrogel formation. These hydrogels can
be made to contain β-sheets that are covalently coupled to the
polymer backbone (βC, shown in part C) and a controlled mixture
of covalently coupled β-sheet peptides with uncoupled “free”
β-sheet peptides (βF, shown in part D).
(A) Schematic of the azide-modified self-assembling β-sheet
peptide (N3-D2I4D2) and
alkyne-functionalized γ-PGA biopolymer. Synthesis and assembly
of the hybrid hydrogel through mixing of azido-peptide and alkyne-polymer
was followed by the copper-catalyzed click reaction (B) and assembly
of β-sheets, inducing hydrogel formation. These hydrogels can
be made to contain β-sheets that are covalently coupled to the
polymer backbone (βC, shown in part C) and a controlled mixture
of covalently coupled β-sheet peptides with uncoupled “free”
β-sheet peptides (βF, shown in part D).
Results and Discussion
Hybrid Hydrogel Formation
Hybrid hydrogels were synthesized
from β-sheet forming peptides with an N-terminal azide (N3-D2I4D2) and γ-PGA,
which had approximately 15% of the carboxylic acids modified with
an alkyne (Figure A). The β-sheet peptide sequences were designed to contain
a central region of four isoleucine residues, an amino acid with a
high propensity to form β-sheets.[39,40] This central
region is flanked by two aspartic acid residues on either side, which
enhance the solubility of the hydrophobic isoleucines. These polymers
were then mixed with azide-modified peptides, and copper-catalyzed
click chemistry was used to click the peptides to the polymer and
functionalize 5%, 10%, or 15% of the repeat units, referred to as
γ-PGA-5%βC, γ-PGA-10%βC, and γ-PGA-15%βC,
respectively (Figure B), and coupled using standard copper-catalyzed click chemistry (Figure C). After coupling
these materials were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) at the
desired concentration, pipetted into a dialysis tube, and dialyzed
for over 24 h to remove the DMSO and any remaining copper, during
which time the hydrogel formed in the tube. Under aqueous conditions,
the peptide grafts were expected to self-assemble, providing physical
cross-links of the hydrophilic polymer chain, resulting in the formation
of a hydrogel. The hydrogel does not significantly swell during dialysis
(Table S1), and inductively coupled plasma
optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) showed that the concentration
of copper remaining in the hydrogels is below the detection limit
(Figure S4). We also made hydrogels which
had a mixture of covalently coupled and unbound peptides to see if
adding in “free” peptide can be used to modify the mechanical
properties of the hydrogel. In these hydrogels there was a constant
15% functionalization equivalent, but with either 5% or 10% of the
peptide covalently coupled, with the remaining peptide free (Figure D). These are referred
to as γ-PGA-5%βC+10%βF and γ-PGA-10%βC+5%βF.
This series of materials allows us to study the effects of peptide
functionalization, coupled versus uncoupled peptides, and concentration
on the mechanical properties of self-assembled peptide–polymer
hydrogels.
Analysis of Secondary Structure
Circular dichroism
was performed to better understand the secondary structure of the
hybrid hydrogels. In previous work on similar polymer-β-sheet
hybrid networks, the CD showed a minimum around 218 nm, which is indicative
of the β-sheet conformation.[31,41−43] In our studies, γ-PGA had a CD spectra consisting of a minimum
at 206 nm and reached a positive maximum at 195 nm (Figure A). Depending on its bacterial
origin, γ-PGA predominantly formed from either d- or l-glutamic acid units, or a mixture of both. Previous studies
have shown that γ-PGA can adopt ordered structures and generate
a CD signal.[44,45] The CD spectra of Bacillus
subtilis derived γ-PGA used in this study has a spectrum
similar to that of the γ-PGA species that predominantly consist
of d-glutamate stretches. Since γ-PGA itself generated
a CD signal, this complicates the analysis of the spectra of the hydrogels,
as both the polymer backbone and peptide components will contribute
to the overall CD signature. Following β-sheet peptide conjugation,
the CD had a minimum between around 220 and 230 nm for all samples,
which is within the typical range for negative minima in β-sheet-forming
systems (218–230 nm) and is thought to be representative of
a β-sheet conformation of the attached peptide. This is interesting
as even at the lowest β-sheet peptide concentrations (γ-PGA-5%βC)
only 26% of the conjugate is peptide (by mass), while the remaining
part is the γ-PGA polymer, yet the CD signal seems to be dominated
by the self-assembling peptide. In this hybrid hydrogel, a larger
fraction of β-sheet peptide leads to a red-shifting of the CD
signal, which suggests that γ-PGA could be influencing the spectra
by blue-shifting the CD signal more closely to that of the γ-PGA
alone.
Figure 2
Spectroscopic studies of the hybrid hydrogels. (A) CD spectra showing
minima for hybrid hydrogels between 220 and 230 nm, typically indicative
of β-sheet formation. (B) FTIR spectra of the amide I region.
(C) Thioflavin T assay, indicating the presence of β-sheets
in the hydrogels that is greatly reduced in the presence of guanidinium
chloride. All hydrogels were made 7.5% hybrid hydrogel by weight.
FTIR studies in part C were performed on lyophilized hydrogels.
Spectroscopic studies of the hybrid hydrogels. (A) CD spectra showing
minima for hybrid hydrogels between 220 and 230 nm, typically indicative
of β-sheet formation. (B) FTIR spectra of the amide I region.
(C) Thioflavin T assay, indicating the presence of β-sheets
in the hydrogels that is greatly reduced in the presence of guanidinium
chloride. All hydrogels were made 7.5% hybrid hydrogel by weight.
FTIR studies in part C were performed on lyophilized hydrogels.When investigating the secondary
structure of γ-PGA grafted
with β-sheet peptides, it should be noted that the γ-PGA
and β-sheet peptides will not only contribute to the CD signal
themselves, but they can modify the conformation of the polymer backbone
and the peptide, making determination of the contributions of the
individual parts difficult. Furthermore, β-sheet peptides generally
adopt conformations that minimize their own free energy; however,
in our systems some or all of the peptides are covalently tethered
to a polymer which itself exerts forces on the β-sheet.
Fourier
Transform Infrared Spectroscopy
FTIR was used
to further verify the presence of the β-sheet secondary structure
in the hybrid hydrogels. The amide I peak is sensitive to secondary
structure, and its presence at 1630 cm–1 indicates
a β-sheet conformation.[46,47] As seen in Figure B, a prominent peak
at 1630 cm–1 is displayed in all the synthesized
hybrid hydrogels and is not present in the γ-PGA spectra. FTIR
performed on the γ-PGA-10%βC in both D2O and
in the dried state had similar spectra, indicating that our results
are representative of the hydrated hydrogel (Figure S5).
Thioflavin T Binding Studies
ThT
is a benzothiazole
which increases in fluorescence when bound to β-sheet-rich structures.[48] This was also used to verify the presence of
β-sheets and has the advantage of having low background from
other polypeptide secondary structures, such as γ-PGA-alkyne,
which can influence other spectroscopic techniques.[49,50] As seen in Figure C, exciting the hydrogels at 440 nm showed an enhancement in ThT
fluorescence at 485 nm compared to γ-PGA, which did not have
a peak. Interestingly, the mixtures of free and bound peptide have
lower ThT signals than the hybrid hydrogels with only bound peptide,
suggesting that having peptides tethered to polymers may change the
β-sheet conformation in a way which effects ThT binding. To
verify that β-sheet structures were responsible for the ThT
signal, the hybrid hydrogels were incubated with 6 M guanidinium chloride
(GndCl), a β-sheet denaturant. The resulting spectra show a
significant loss of the 485 nm peak for all the hybrid hydrogels (Figure C).
Mechanical
Characterization
The mechanical properties
of the hydrogels were studied using oscillatory shear rheology. In
this, the storage modulus (G′) (elastic component)
and loss modulus (G″) (viscous component)
were observed as a function of both oscillation frequency and strain.
For all the materials that formed self-supporting hydrogels, the storage
modulus exceeded the loss modulus, indicating the formation of a gel.
From the frequency sweeps (Figure S6B)
it is seen that the mechanical properties of the hybrid hydrogel are
relatively independent of oscillation frequency. The mechanical properties
of the hydrogels remained in the linear elastic region up to strains
of around 10% with little change in the storage modulus, followed
by a significant decrease in storage modulus for strains exceeding
20% (Figure S6A,D).The mechanical
properties of the hybrid hydrogels were found to be dependent on the
concentration of the hydrogel, the β-sheet peptide graft density,
and the ratio of coupled peptides to free peptides. The stiffness
of the hydrogels could be varied by over an order of magnitude through
changing concentration as seen in Figure A. Comparing the stiffness of γ-PGA-10%βC
(5 wt%), γ-PGA-10%βC (7.5 wt%), and γ-PGA-10%βC
(10 wt%), it is seen that the modulus of the hydrogels increases significantly
with increased hydrogel concentration, from 10 kPa to over 200 kPa,
while keeping other mechanical properties, such as failure strain,
constant. These stiffness values are in the region of many soft tissues
and compare well to those from previously published peptide–polymer
hybrid hydrogel systems.[20−22,31−34]
Figure 3
(A)
Frequency sweep of the γ-PGA-10%βC hybrid hydrogel
at different concentrations (5, 7.5, and 10 wt%). (B) Mechanical properties
of the hybrid-hydrogels can be controlled using both grafting density
and ratio of bound and unbound β-sheet peptide. (C) Cyclic sweeps
of increasing strain from 0 to 0.01%, 1%, 2%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 30%,
50%, and 100%), with a point representing the last point of each strain
sweep. (D) Three repeat strain sweeps from zero to 200% strain at
an oscillation frequency of 6.283 rad s–1 with a
30 min recovery period in between each sweep for all of the hybrid
hydrogels, showing that gels are able to recover their mechanical
properties after failure. All samples are 7.5% hybrid hydrogel by
weight unless otherwise noted.
(A)
Frequency sweep of the γ-PGA-10%βC hybrid hydrogel
at different concentrations (5, 7.5, and 10 wt%). (B) Mechanical properties
of the hybrid-hydrogels can be controlled using both grafting density
and ratio of bound and unbound β-sheet peptide. (C) Cyclic sweeps
of increasing strain from 0 to 0.01%, 1%, 2%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 30%,
50%, and 100%), with a point representing the last point of each strain
sweep. (D) Three repeat strain sweeps from zero to 200% strain at
an oscillation frequency of 6.283 rad s–1 with a
30 min recovery period in between each sweep for all of the hybrid
hydrogels, showing that gels are able to recover their mechanical
properties after failure. All samples are 7.5% hybrid hydrogel by
weight unless otherwise noted.One of the benefits of using peptide–polymer hybrid
hydrogel
systems is that the high-molecular-weight polymer backbone should
help to reinforce the self-assembled β-sheets in the gel, helping
the gel maintain its mechanical properties when exposed to significant
strain. The failure strain of hydrogel systems can be defined as the
point where the loss modulus surpasses the storage modulus and the
gel becomes a viscous liquid.In biological environments, materials
will need to be able to withstand
mechanical deformation from both exogenous strains placed on the entire
biomaterial and the forces cells exert on their local matrix. To further
characterize the ability of our gels to recover from moderate deformation,
we placed them under a series of immediately increasing strains and
monitored the effect on storage and loss moduli. Figure C shows the evolution of storage
moduli of the hybrid hydrogels for these series of strain sweeps.
Hybrid hydrogels typically do not lose any mechanical integrity until
strains up to 20%. However, it is notable that the γ-PGA-10%βC+5%βF
and especially 5%βC+10%βF start yielding at lower strains
than those hydrogels that consist solely of covalently coupled peptides
(Figure C). In these
systems either one-third or two-thirds of the peptides are not covalently
attached to the polymer backbone and should be less hindered to assemble
into nanostructures. This suggests that the benefits of covalently
bonding all peptides to the backbone outweigh any ability that free
peptides have in helping to form nanostructural conformations that
would not be available to a system with all covalently bound peptides.
These covalently bonded hydrogels help the system to resist strain
without losing mechanical properties. Interestingly, changing the
ratio of covalently bound and free peptides in the system allows for
tuning the yield strain in the hydrogels independently of storage
modulus, which is not possible by changing either hydrogel or peptide
concentration.Figure C and Figure S6A,D show that the
storage modulus of
some hydrogels began to drop slightly for each individual sweep for
larger strains, with the final values of G′
typically falling to 80% of their initial value. This again highlights
the ability for these hybrid hydrogels to maintain mechanical integrity.
In this system, the plastic deformation at larger strains is gradual
rather than catastrophic, and the ability to recover mechanical properties
after large strains is rapid, as there are no waiting periods in between
subsequent strains in this study.One of the primary benefits
of using non-covalent rather than covalent
interactions is the ability of the bonds to reform after failure.
Thus, after the application of high strains, the hybrid hydrogels
would quickly recover their mechanical properties. To test this, we
performed three individual strain sweeps to 200% with 30 min recovery
periods in between the strains (Figure D). Some gels in this study had storage moduli that
matched the initial moduli of the first strain sweep. There was also
a large recovery in the failure strains, which ranged from 81% to
100% of the first strain sweep. The ability of these materials to
self-heal indicates that the non-covalent β-sheets are able
to rapidly reform in situ after breaking during large strains. The
fact that they retain a larger percentage of their initial mechanical
properties after a 30 min recovery period versus immediate strain
to failure (around 70%) underscores the dynamic nature of the hybrid
hydrogels, as the β-sheets are able to adopt more energetically
favorable and mechanically robust conformations over time. The self-healing
characteristic and the resistance to cyclic stain render these hybrid
hydrogels ideal for biomedical applications which require recovery
after significant deformation, such as injectable therapies, or include
cell types which exert significant strain on their environment. We
performed rheological testing on the γ-PGA-10%βC (7.5
wt%) hydrogel with physiological salt concentration and found that
it retained the majority of its mechanical properties, with a storage
modulus of 35 kPa, compared to 45 kPa for hydrogels in ultrapure water
(Figure S7). To ensure that our hydrogels
supported cell attachment and viability, we cultured human dermal
fibroblasts on the γ-PGA-10%βC (7.5 wt%) hydrogel and
found that the cells were able to adhere and were viable (Figure S8).
Scanning Electron Microscopy
The peptide–polymer
hybrids form opaque hydrogels that can be manipulated with tweezers
(Figure S9A). To better understand the
nanostructure of the hybrid hydrogels, the materials were dehydrated
via critical point drying and imaged using scanning electron microscopy
(SEM). The SEM images showed that all the hybrid hydrogels have a
highly porous structure formed from a connected network of fibers,
as shown in Figures and S9. Hydrogels that had higher amounts
of γ-PGA, such as the γ-PGA-5%βC (Figure A) appeared to have more sheet-like
nanostructures, while more peptide and free peptide containing hydrogels
had an increased amount of high-aspect ratio fibrillar nanostructures.
Figure 4
SEM images
of (A) γ-PGA-5%βC, (B) γ-PGA-10%βC,
(C) γ-PGA-15%βC, and (D) γ-PGA-10%βC + 5%βF.
All hydrogels are 7.5% hybrid hydrogel by weight, and the scale bar
is 1 μm.
SEM images
of (A) γ-PGA-5%βC, (B) γ-PGA-10%βC,
(C) γ-PGA-15%βC, and (D) γ-PGA-10%βC + 5%βF.
All hydrogels are 7.5% hybrid hydrogel by weight, and the scale bar
is 1 μm.
Conclusions
In
the work described in this paper we synthesized peptide–polymer
hybrid hydrogels by grafting β-sheet peptides onto a poly(γ-glutamic
acid) polymer backbone. We were able to tailor the stiffness of the
hydrogels by changing the β-sheet peptide graft density, changing
the bulk hydrogel concentration, and also changing the ratio of covalently
coupled and free peptide. We were also able to create hydrogels with
similar storage moduli but different abilities to maintain mechanical
properties in response to strain. These β-sheet peptides act
as strong physical cross-links, allowing the hydrogel to maintain
mechanical properties over a series of increasing strains up to ∼20%.
After being strained to failure, the hydrogel was able to heal through
reassembly of β-sheet domains, which can reform due to their
non-covalent nature. We used a variety of spectroscopic techniques
to probe the secondary structure of the hybrid hydrogels, which indicated
the formation of β-sheets. With gelation occurring at β-sheet
peptide graft densities between 5% and 15% of the carboxylic acids
on the poly(γ-glutamic acid) backbone, the hydrogels could be
modified further with peptides and bioactive epitopes, such as the
cell adhesion sequence Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD). Having the ability to incorporate
additional functionality coupled with tailorable mechanical properties,
this self-healing hybrid hydrogel serves as a promising platform for
future tissue-engineering scaffolds and biomedical applications.
Authors: Cristina Gentilini; Yixiang Dong; Jessica R May; Silvia Goldoni; David E Clarke; Boon-Heng Lee; E Thomas Pashuck; Molly M Stevens Journal: Adv Healthc Mater Date: 2012-04-05 Impact factor: 9.933
Authors: Babatunde O Okesola; Yuanhao Wu; Burak Derkus; Samar Gani; Dongsheng Wu; Dafna Knani; David K Smith; Dave J Adams; Alvaro Mata Journal: Chem Mater Date: 2019-09-12 Impact factor: 9.811
Authors: Francisco G Blanco; Natalia Hernández; Virginia Rivero-Buceta; Beatriz Maestro; Jesús M Sanz; Aránzazu Mato; Ana M Hernández-Arriaga; M Auxiliadora Prieto Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) Date: 2021-06-04 Impact factor: 5.076