Literature DB >> 29038381

Has molecular imaging delivered to drug development?

Philip S Murphy1, Neel Patel2, Timothy J McCarthy3.   

Abstract

Pharmaceutical research and development requires a systematic interrogation of a candidate molecule through clinical studies. To ensure resources are spent on only the most promising molecules, early clinical studies must understand fundamental attributes of the drug candidate, including exposure at the target site, target binding and pharmacological response in disease. Molecular imaging has the potential to quantitatively characterize these properties in small, efficient clinical studies. Specific benefits of molecular imaging in this setting (compared to blood and tissue sampling) include non-invasiveness and the ability to survey the whole body temporally. These methods have been adopted primarily for neuroscience drug development, catalysed by the inability to access the brain compartment by other means. If we believe molecular imaging is a technology platform able to underpin clinical drug development, why is it not adopted further to enable earlier decisions? This article considers current drug development needs, progress towards integration of molecular imaging into studies, current impediments and proposed models to broaden use and increase impact.This article is part of the themed issue 'Challenges for chemistry in molecular imaging'.
© 2017 The Author(s).

Keywords:  drug development; molecular imaging; pharmaceutical research and development

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29038381      PMCID: PMC5647269          DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2017.0112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci        ISSN: 1364-503X            Impact factor:   4.226


  25 in total

1.  Can the flow of medicines be improved? Fundamental pharmacokinetic and pharmacological principles toward improving Phase II survival.

Authors:  Paul Morgan; Piet H Van Der Graaf; John Arrowsmith; Doug E Feltner; Kira S Drummond; Craig D Wegner; Steve D A Street
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 7.851

Review 2.  Positron emission tomography molecular imaging for drug development.

Authors:  Paul M Matthews; Eugenii A Rabiner; Jan Passchier; Roger N Gunn
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  A phase 3 trial of semagacestat for treatment of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Rachelle S Doody; Rema Raman; Martin Farlow; Takeshi Iwatsubo; Bruno Vellas; Steven Joffe; Karl Kieburtz; Feng He; Xiaoying Sun; Ronald G Thomas; Paul S Aisen; Eric Siemers; Gopalan Sethuraman; Richard Mohs
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Image-guided cancer surgery using near-infrared fluorescence.

Authors:  Alexander L Vahrmeijer; Merlijn Hutteman; Joost R van der Vorst; Cornelis J H van de Velde; John V Frangioni
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Design and selection parameters to accelerate the discovery of novel central nervous system positron emission tomography (PET) ligands and their application in the development of a novel phosphodiesterase 2A PET ligand.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Anabella Villalobos; Elizabeth M Beck; Thomas Bocan; Thomas A Chappie; Laigao Chen; Sarah Grimwood; Steven D Heck; Christopher J Helal; Xinjun Hou; John M Humphrey; Jiemin Lu; Marc B Skaddan; Timothy J McCarthy; Patrick R Verhoest; Travis T Wager; Kenneth Zasadny
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 6.  Forward to the Past: The Case for Quantitative PET Imaging.

Authors:  Adriaan A Lammertsma
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 7.  Lessons learned from the fate of AstraZeneca's drug pipeline: a five-dimensional framework.

Authors:  David Cook; Dearg Brown; Robert Alexander; Ruth March; Paul Morgan; Gemma Satterthwaite; Menelas N Pangalos
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 84.694

8.  A comparison of the behavior of (64)Cu-acetate and (64)Cu-ATSM in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Rebekka Hueting; Veerle Kersemans; Bart Cornelissen; Matthew Tredwell; Kamila Hussien; Martin Christlieb; Antony D Gee; Jan Passchier; Sean C Smart; Jonathan R Dilworth; Véronique Gouverneur; Ruth J Muschel
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Ways toward an early diagnosis in Alzheimer's disease: the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI).

Authors:  Susanne G Mueller; Michael W Weiner; Leon J Thal; Ronald C Petersen; Clifford R Jack; William Jagust; John Q Trojanowski; Arthur W Toga; Laurel Beckett
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 21.566

10.  High tumor uptake of (64)Cu: implications for molecular imaging of tumor characteristics with copper-based PET tracers.

Authors:  Jesper Tranekjær Jørgensen; Morten Persson; Jacob Madsen; Andreas Kjær
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 2.408

View more
  2 in total

1.  Challenges for chemistry in molecular imaging.

Authors:  David Parker; Nicholas J Long; Stephen Faulkner
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Metastatic and non-metastatic melanoma imaging using Sgc8-c aptamer PTK7-recognizer.

Authors:  Estefanía Sicco; Amy Mónaco; Marcelo Fernandez; María Moreno; Victoria Calzada; Hugo Cerecetto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.