Nathalie Mertens1,2, Ralph Paul Maguire3, Kim Serdons4, Brigitte Lacroix3, Joel Mercier3, David Sciberras3, Koen Van Laere4, Michel Koole4. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. nathalie.mertens@kuleuven.be. 2. Division of Nuclear Medicine, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. nathalie.mertens@kuleuven.be. 3. UCB Pharma, Braine-l'Alleud, Belgium. 4. Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate different non-invasive methods for generating (R)-1-((3-([11C]methyl)pyridin-4-yl)methyl)-4-(3,4,5-trifluorophenyl)pyrrolidin-2-one) ([11C]UCB-J) parametric maps using white matter (centrum semi-ovale-SO) as reference tissue. PROCEDURES: Ten healthy volunteers (8 M/2F; age 27.6 ± 10.0 years) underwent a 90-min dynamic [11C]UCB-J positron emission tomography (PET) scan with full arterial blood sampling and metabolite analysis before and after administration of a novel chemical entity with high affinity for presynaptic synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A (SV2A). A simplified reference tissue model (SRTM2), multilinear reference tissue model (MRTM2), and reference Logan graphical analysis (rLGA) were used to generate binding potential maps using SO as reference tissue (BPSO). Shorter dynamic acquisitions down to 50 min were also considered. In addition, standard uptake value ratios (SUVR) relative to SO were evaluated for three post-injection intervals (SUVRSO,40-70min, SUVRSO,50-80min, and SUVRSO,60-90min respectively). Regional parametric BPSO + 1 and SUVRSO were compared with regional distribution volume ratios of a 1-tissue compartment model (1TCM DVRSO) using Spearman correlation and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: For all methods, highly significant correlations were found between regional, parametric BPSO + 1 (r = [0.63;0.96]) or SUVRSO (r = [0.90;0.91]) estimates and regional 1TCM DVRSO. For a 90-min dynamic scan, parametric SRTM2 and MRTM2 values presented similar small bias and variability (- 3.0 ± 2.9 % for baseline SRTM2) and outperformed rLGA (- 10.0 ± 5.3 % for baseline rLGA). Reducing the dynamic acquisition to 60 min had limited impact on the bias and variability of parametric SRTM2 BPSO estimates (- 1.0 ± 9.9 % for baseline SRTM2) while a higher variability (- 1.83 ± 10.8 %) for baseline MRTM2 was observed for shorter acquisition times. Both SUVRSO,60-90min and SUVRSO,50-80min showed similar small bias and variability (- 2.8 ± 4.6 % bias for baseline SUVRSO,60-90min). CONCLUSION: SRTM2 is the preferred method for a voxelwise analysis of dynamic [11C]UCB-J PET using SO as reference tissue, while reducing the dynamic acquisition to 60 min has limited impact on [11C]UCB-J BPSO parametric maps. For a static PET protocol, both SUVRSO,60-90min and SUVRSO,50-80min images are an excellent proxy for [11C]UCB-J BPSO parametric maps.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate different non-invasive methods for generating (R)-1-((3-([11C]methyl)pyridin-4-yl)methyl)-4-(3,4,5-trifluorophenyl)pyrrolidin-2-one) ([11C]UCB-J) parametric maps using white matter (centrum semi-ovale-SO) as reference tissue. PROCEDURES: Ten healthy volunteers (8 M/2F; age 27.6 ± 10.0 years) underwent a 90-min dynamic [11C]UCB-J positron emission tomography (PET) scan with full arterial blood sampling and metabolite analysis before and after administration of a novel chemical entity with high affinity for presynaptic synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A (SV2A). A simplified reference tissue model (SRTM2), multilinear reference tissue model (MRTM2), and reference Logan graphical analysis (rLGA) were used to generate binding potential maps using SO as reference tissue (BPSO). Shorter dynamic acquisitions down to 50 min were also considered. In addition, standard uptake value ratios (SUVR) relative to SO were evaluated for three post-injection intervals (SUVRSO,40-70min, SUVRSO,50-80min, and SUVRSO,60-90min respectively). Regional parametric BPSO + 1 and SUVRSO were compared with regional distribution volume ratios of a 1-tissue compartment model (1TCM DVRSO) using Spearman correlation and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: For all methods, highly significant correlations were found between regional, parametric BPSO + 1 (r = [0.63;0.96]) or SUVRSO (r = [0.90;0.91]) estimates and regional 1TCM DVRSO. For a 90-min dynamic scan, parametric SRTM2 and MRTM2 values presented similar small bias and variability (- 3.0 ± 2.9 % for baseline SRTM2) and outperformed rLGA (- 10.0 ± 5.3 % for baseline rLGA). Reducing the dynamic acquisition to 60 min had limited impact on the bias and variability of parametric SRTM2 BPSO estimates (- 1.0 ± 9.9 % for baseline SRTM2) while a higher variability (- 1.83 ± 10.8 %) for baseline MRTM2 was observed for shorter acquisition times. Both SUVRSO,60-90min and SUVRSO,50-80min showed similar small bias and variability (- 2.8 ± 4.6 % bias for baseline SUVRSO,60-90min). CONCLUSION: SRTM2 is the preferred method for a voxelwise analysis of dynamic [11C]UCB-J PET using SO as reference tissue, while reducing the dynamic acquisition to 60 min has limited impact on [11C]UCB-J BPSO parametric maps. For a static PET protocol, both SUVRSO,60-90min and SUVRSO,50-80min images are an excellent proxy for [11C]UCB-J BPSO parametric maps.
Entities:
Keywords:
Parametric maps; Reference tissue; Subcortical white matter; Synaptic density; [11C]UCB-J PET
Authors: Guomei Tang; Kathryn Gudsnuk; Sheng-Han Kuo; Marisa L Cotrina; Gorazd Rosoklija; Alexander Sosunov; Mark S Sonders; Ellen Kanter; Candace Castagna; Ai Yamamoto; Zhenyu Yue; Ottavio Arancio; Bradley S Peterson; Frances Champagne; Andrew J Dwork; James Goldman; David Sulzer Journal: Neuron Date: 2014-08-21 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Vincent J Cunningham; Eugenii A Rabiner; Mark Slifstein; Marc Laruelle; Roger N Gunn Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2009-09-09 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Koen Van Laere; Rawaha U Ahmad; Hendra Hudyana; Kristof Dubois; Mark E Schmidt; Sofie Celen; Guy Bormans; Michel Koole Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2013-07-10 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Alexander Hammers; Richard Allom; Matthias J Koepp; Samantha L Free; Ralph Myers; Louis Lemieux; Tejal N Mitchell; David J Brooks; John S Duncan Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Greet Vanderlinden; Jenny Ceccarini; Thomas Vande Casteele; Laura Michiels; Robin Lemmens; Eric Triau; Kim Serdons; Jos Tournoy; Michel Koole; Mathieu Vandenbulcke; Koen Van Laere Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2022-07-06 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: Adam P Mecca; Ming-Kai Chen; Ryan S O'Dell; Mika Naganawa; Takuya Toyonaga; Tyler A Godek; Joanna E Harris; Hugh H Bartlett; Wenzhen Zhao; Emmie R Banks; Gessica S Ni; Kelly Rogers; Jean Dominique Gallezot; Jim Ropchan; Paul R Emery; Nabeel B Nabulsi; Brent C Vander Wyk; Amy F T Arnsten; Yiyun Huang; Richard E Carson; Christopher H van Dyck Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2021-11-20 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Adam P Mecca; Ryan S O'Dell; Emily S Sharp; Emmie R Banks; Hugh H Bartlett; Wenzhen Zhao; Sylwia Lipior; Nina G Diepenbrock; Ming-Kai Chen; Mika Naganawa; Takuya Toyonaga; Nabeel B Nabulsi; Brent C Vander Wyk; Amy F T Arnsten; Yiyun Huang; Richard E Carson; Christopher H van Dyck Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2022-02-17 Impact factor: 16.655
Authors: June van Aalst; Jenny Ceccarini; Stefan Sunaert; Patrick Dupont; Michel Koole; Koen Van Laere Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2021-01-14 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Hayel Tuncel; Ronald Boellaard; Emma M Coomans; Erik Fj de Vries; Andor Wjm Glaudemans; Paula Kopschina Feltes; David V García; Sander Cj Verfaillie; Emma E Wolters; Steven P Sweeney; J Michael Ryan; Magnus Ivarsson; Berkley A Lynch; Patrick Schober; Philip Scheltens; Robert C Schuit; Albert D Windhorst; Peter P De Deyn; Bart Nm van Berckel; Sandeep Sv Golla Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2020-10-08 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Adam P Mecca; Ming-Kai Chen; Ryan S O'Dell; Mika Naganawa; Takuya Toyonaga; Tyler A Godek; Joanna E Harris; Hugh H Bartlett; Wenzhen Zhao; Nabeel B Nabulsi; Brent C Vander Wyk; Pradeep Varma; Amy F T Arnsten; Yiyun Huang; Richard E Carson; Christopher H van Dyck Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2020-05-13 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Koen Van Laere; Michel Koole; Christopher Cawthorne; Paul Maguire; Joel Mercier; David Sciberras; Kim Serdons; Guy Bormans; Jan de Hoon Journal: EJNMMI Phys Date: 2021-04-23
Authors: Hayel Tuncel; Ronald Boellaard; Emma M Coomans; Marijke den Hollander-Meeuwsen; Erik F J de Vries; Andor W J M Glaudemans; Paula Kopschina Feltes; David Vállez García; Sander C J Verfaillie; Emma E Wolters; Steven P Sweeney; J Michael Ryan; Magnus Ivarsson; Berkley A Lynch; Patrick Schober; Philip Scheltens; Robert C Schuit; Albert D Windhorst; Peter P De Deyn; Bart N M van Berckel; Sandeep S V Golla Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2022-01-24 Impact factor: 3.138