Literature DB >> 28521964

There is variability in our perception of the standard head orientation.

G N Hughes1, J Gateño2, J D English3, J F Teichgraeber4, J J Xia5.   

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to determine: (1) whether an observer's perception of the correct anatomical alignment of the head changes with time, and (2) whether different observers agree on the correct anatomical alignment. To determine whether the perception of the correct anatomical alignment changes with time (intra-observer comparison), a group of 30 observers were asked to orient, into anatomical alignment, the three-dimensional (3D) head photograph of a normal man, on two separate occasions. To determine whether different observers agree on the correct anatomical alignment (inter-observer comparison), the observed orientations were compared. The results of intra-observer comparisons showed substantial variability between the first and second anatomical alignments. Bland-Altman coefficients of repeatability for pitch, yaw, and roll, were 6.9°, 4.4°, and 2.4°, respectively. The results of inter-observer comparisons showed that the agreement for roll was good (sample variance 0.4, standard deviation (SD) 0.7°), the agreement for yaw was moderate (sample variance 2.0, SD 1.4°), and the agreement for pitch was poor (sample variance 15.5, SD 3.9°). In conclusion, the perception of correct anatomical alignment changes considerably with time. Different observers disagree on the correct anatomical alignment. Agreement among multiple observers was bad for pitch, moderate for yaw, and good for roll.
Copyright © 2017 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  human perception; inter-observer variability; intra-observer variability; standard head orientation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28521964      PMCID: PMC5626578          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.04.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  17 in total

1.  Fifteen-year reproducibility of natural head posture: A longitudinal study.

Authors:  L Peng; M S Cooke
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  The relationship between estimated and registered natural head position.

Authors:  Jiuhui Jiang; Tianmin Xu; Jiuxiang Lin
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 3.  Natural position of the head: review of two-dimensional and three-dimensional methods of recording.

Authors:  D Cassi; C De Biase; I Tonni; M Gandolfini; A Di Blasio; M G Piancino
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 1.651

4.  Natural head position in standing subjects.

Authors:  B Solow; A Tallgren
Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 2.331

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Accuracy of Different Modalities to Record Natural Head Position in 3 Dimensions: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ming Yin Leung; John Lo; Yiu Yan Leung
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Algorithm for planning a double-jaw orthognathic surgery using a computer-aided surgical simulation (CASS) protocol. Part 2: three-dimensional cephalometry.

Authors:  J J Xia; J Gateno; J F Teichgraeber; P Yuan; J Li; K-C Chen; A Jajoo; M Nicol; D M Alfi
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.789

8.  Natural head position as a basis for cephalometric analysis.

Authors:  F Lundström; A Lundström
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  The reproducibility of natural head posture: a methodological study.

Authors:  M S Cooke; S H Wei
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  The primal sagittal plane of the head: a new concept.

Authors:  J Gateno; A Jajoo; M Nicol; J J Xia
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 2.789

View more
  2 in total

1.  Midsagittal Plane First: Building a Strong Facial Reference Frame for Computer-Aided Surgical Simulation.

Authors:  Maggie K Grissom; Jaime Gateno; Jeryl D English; Helder B Jacob; Tianshu Kuang; Carla E Gonzalez; Peng Yuan; Hannah H Deng; Caleb J Frick; Daeseung Kim; Abdullahi Hassan; James J Xia
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Does Head Orientation Influence 3D Facial Imaging? A Study on Accuracy and Precision of Stereophotogrammetric Acquisition.

Authors:  Giuditta Battistoni; Diana Cassi; Marisabel Magnifico; Giuseppe Pedrazzi; Marco Di Blasio; Benedetta Vaienti; Alberto Di Blasio
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-17       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.