Literature DB >> 10393584

Fifteen-year reproducibility of natural head posture: A longitudinal study.

L Peng1, M S Cooke.   

Abstract

Natural head posture continues to be widely used as the logical reference position for the evaluation of craniofacial morphology. The basic underlying premise is that the long-term clinical reproducibility (variability) of natural head posture is significantly less than the variability of conventional reference planes with respect to the vertical. This study reports the 15-year longitudinal reproducibility of natural head posture. Twenty Chinese adults in Hong Kong, who had initial natural head posture radiographs at age 12 years, were followed up and had repeated cephalograms after 15 years. The method error (reproducibility) after 15 years was 2.2 degrees, which compared favorably with the 5-year reproducibility (method error = 3.0 degrees ) and the 5 to 10 minutes reproducibility (method error = 1.9 degrees ). The individual variability of natural head posture reproducibility increased slightly over time. After 15 years the variance of natural head posture (4.8 degrees [= 2.2(2)]) remains significantly less than the variance of intracranial reference planes to the vertical (25 degrees to 36 degrees ). Cephalometric analyses based on natural head posture therefore remain valid over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10393584     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70306-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  23 in total

1.  Effect of low pull headgear on head position.

Authors:  Santosh Kumar; Kalyana Chakravarthy Pentapati
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2013-01

2.  The relationship between 3D dentofacial photogrammetry measurements and traditional cephalometric measurements.

Authors:  Jose C Castillo; Grace Gianneschi; Demyana Azer; Amornrut Manosudprasit; Arshan Haghi; Neetu Bansal; Veerasathpurush Allareddy; Mohamed I Masoud
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Effects of head positioning on cephalometric measurements.

Authors:  M Berneburg; B Koos; R Kratochwil; A Godt
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  There is variability in our perception of the standard head orientation.

Authors:  G N Hughes; J Gateño; J D English; J F Teichgraeber; J J Xia
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 2.789

5.  Assessment of the Relationship Between Facial and Dental Midlines with Anatomical Landmarks of the Face and Oral Cavity.

Authors:  Abolfazl Farahani; Karim Jafari; Ali Hemmati; Abbas Naghizadeh; Rahman Nemati; Mohammad Hossein Farahani
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2019-12-01

6.  Reliability of the integrated radiograph-photograph method to obtain natural head position in cephalometric diagnosis.

Authors:  Dima P Dvortsin; Qingsong Ye; Gerard J Pruim; Pieter U Dijkstra; Yijin Ren
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Rapid maxillary expansion effects on dynamic measurement of natural head position.

Authors:  Ahmet Yagci; Tancan Uysal; Serdar Usumez; Metin Orhan
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Extraction of average neck flexion angle during swallowing in neutral and chin-tuck positions.

Authors:  Delbert Hung; Ervin Sejdić; Catriona M Steele; Tom Chau
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 2.819

9.  Three-dimensional evaluation of the relationship between jaw divergence and facial soft tissue dimensions.

Authors:  Roberto Rongo; Joseph Saswat Antoun; Yi Xin Lim; George Dias; Rosa Valletta; Mauro Farella
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Does the Time of Day Affect Natural Head Position or It is Reproducibility?

Authors:  Hr Fattahi; S Torkan; Hr Pakshir; L Darabi
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2012-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.