Literature DB >> 28518169

Population-based impact of noninvasive prenatal screening on screening and diagnostic testing for fetal aneuploidy.

Lisa Hui1,2,3, Briohny Hutchinson1,3, Alice Poulton1, Jane Halliday1,4.   

Abstract

PurposeTo assess the population-wide impact of noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) on combined first-trimester screening (CFTS), early ultrasound (11-13 weeks), and invasive prenatal diagnosis in a state with over 73,000 births per year.MethodsAnalysis of population-based data from 2000 to 2015 including (i) invasive prenatal tests, (ii) CFTS uptake, and (iii) total births. Utilization of early ultrasound was analyzed before and after NIPS (2010-2015).ResultsInvasive testing decreased significantly by 39.6% from 2012 to 2015 despite steady births. More than half of all confirmed cases of trisomy 21 were ascertained by NIPS in 2015, despite NIPS comprising only 11.7% of total indications for invasive testing. CFTS uptake declined significantly from 77.5% in 2013 to 68.1% in 2015, but 11- to 13-week ultrasounds did not. In 2015, ultrasound abnormality replaced CFTS as the most common indication for invasive testing and chromosomal microarray was performed for 85.3% of all prenatal karyotypes.ConclusionPrenatal testing is now unequivocally in the genomic era. NIPS is now the screening test that precedes the majority of confirmed diagnoses of trisomy 21. The contributions of NIPS, early ultrasound, and chromosome microarray have led to unprecedented detection rates of major chromosome abnormalities, now found in 20% of all invasive tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28518169     DOI: 10.1038/gim.2017.55

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  24 in total

1.  National decline in invasive prenatal diagnostic procedures in association with uptake of combined first trimester and cell-free DNA aneuploidy screening.

Authors:  Stephen J Robson; Lisa Hui
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 2.100

2.  What will be the role of first-trimester ultrasound if cell-free DNA screening for aneuploidy becomes routine?

Authors:  J D Sonek; H S Cuckle
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 7.299

3.  Population-based trends in prenatal screening and diagnosis for aneuploidy: a retrospective analysis of 38 years of state-wide data.

Authors:  L Hui; E E Muggli; J L Halliday
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 6.531

4.  Clinical implementation of cell-free DNA-based aneuploidy screening: perspectives from a national audit.

Authors:  L Hui; M Teoh; F da Silva Costa; P Ramsay; R Palma-Dias; Z Richmond; S Piessens; S Walker
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 5.  Noninvasive Prenatal DNA Testing: The Vanguard of Genomic Medicine.

Authors:  Lisa Hui; Diana W Bianchi
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 13.739

6.  Association of combined first-trimester screen and noninvasive prenatal testing on diagnostic procedures.

Authors:  Sebastian Larion; Steven L Warsof; Letty Romary; Margaret Mlynarczyk; David Peleg; Alfred Z Abuhamad
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Impact of noninvasive prenatal testing in regionally dispersed medical centers in the United States.

Authors:  Lawrence D Platt; Mary Beth Janicki; Tracy Prosen; James D Goldberg; Joseph Adashek; Reinaldo Figueroa; John Rodis; Wayne Liao; Amy J Sehnert; Holly L Snyder; Steven L Warsof
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  A single center's experience with noninvasive prenatal testing.

Authors:  Carmen J Beamon; Emily E Hardisty; Sarah C Harris; Neeta L Vora
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Uptake, outcomes, and costs of implementing non-invasive prenatal testing for Down's syndrome into NHS maternity care: prospective cohort study in eight diverse maternity units.

Authors:  Lyn S Chitty; David Wright; Melissa Hill; Talitha I Verhoef; Rebecca Daley; Celine Lewis; Sarah Mason; Fiona McKay; Lucy Jenkins; Abigail Howarth; Louise Cameron; Alec McEwan; Jane Fisher; Mark Kroese; Stephen Morris
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-07-04

10.  Enlarged NT (≥3.5 mm) in the first trimester - not all chromosome aberrations can be detected by NIPT.

Authors:  Malgorzata I Srebniak; Merel C de Wit; Karin E M Diderich; Lutgarde C P Govaerts; Marieke Joosten; Maarten F C M Knapen; Marnix J Bos; Gerda A G Looye-Bruinsma; Mieke Koningen; Attie T J I Go; Robert Jan H Galjaard; Diane Van Opstal
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 2.009

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Screening for fetal chromosomal and subchromosomal disorders.

Authors:  Sarah Harris; Dallas Reed; Neeta L Vora
Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  TRIDENT-2: National Implementation of Genome-wide Non-invasive Prenatal Testing as a First-Tier Screening Test in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Karuna R M van der Meij; Erik A Sistermans; Merryn V E Macville; Servi J C Stevens; Caroline J Bax; Mireille N Bekker; Caterina M Bilardo; Elles M J Boon; Marjan Boter; Karin E M Diderich; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Leonie K Duin; Brigitte H W Faas; Ilse Feenstra; Monique C Haak; Mariëtte J V Hoffer; Nicolette S den Hollander; Iris H I M Hollink; Fernanda S Jehee; Maarten F C M Knapen; Angelique J A Kooper; Irene M van Langen; Klaske D Lichtenbelt; Ingeborg H Linskens; Merel C van Maarle; Dick Oepkes; Mijntje J Pieters; G Heleen Schuring-Blom; Esther Sikkel; Birgit Sikkema-Raddatz; Dominique F C M Smeets; Malgorzata I Srebniak; Ron F Suijkerbuijk; Gita M Tan-Sindhunata; A Jeanine E M van der Ven; Shama L van Zelderen-Bhola; Lidewij Henneman; Robert-Jan H Galjaard; Diane Van Opstal; Marjan M Weiss
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Comparison of indications and results of prenatal invasive diagnostic tests before and after the implementation of the use of cell-free fetal DNA: a tertiary referral center experience.

Authors:  Firat Okmen; Huseyin Ekici; Ismet Hortu; Metehan Imamoglu; Duygu Arican; Haluk Akın; Sermet Sagol
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Non-invasive prenatal testing in mitigating concerns from invasive prenatal diagnostic testing: retrospective assessment of utility in an academic healthcare system in the US.

Authors:  Kibum Kim; Linda Kaitlyn Craft
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.006

5.  Offering pregnant women different levels of genetic information from prenatal chromosome microarray: a prospective study.

Authors:  Jane L Halliday; Cecile Muller; Taryn Charles; Fiona Norris; Joanne Kennedy; Sharon Lewis; Bettina Meiser; Susan Donath; Zornitza Stark; George McGillivray; Melody Menezes; Sian K Smith; Della Forster; Susan Walker; Mark Pertile; David J Amor
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Trends in the use of prenatal testing services for fetal aneuploidy in Ontario: a descriptive study.

Authors:  Tianhua Huang; Shelley Dougan; Mark Walker; Christine M Armour; Nan Okun
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2018-10-05

7.  Factors associated with common and atypical chromosome abnormalities after positive combined first-trimester screening in Chinese women: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Annisa Mak; Helena Lee; C F Poon; S L Kwok; Teresa Ma; K Y K Chan; Anita Kan; Mary Tang; K Y Leung
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Targeted fetal cell-free DNA screening for aneuploidies in 4,594 pregnancies: Single center study.

Authors:  Altug Koc; Ozge Ozer Kaya; Berk Ozyilmaz; Yasar B Kutbay; Ozgur Kirbiyik; Taha R Ozdemir; Kadri M Erdogan; Merve Saka Guvenc; Deniz C Oztekin; Mehmet Ozeren; Halil G Pala; Atalay Ekin; Cenk Gezer; Alkim G Sahingoz Yildirim; Bahar Konuralp Atakul; Secil Kurtulmus; Ugur Turhan; Cuneyt E Taner
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 2.183

9.  Clinical Efficiency of Non-invasive Prenatal Screening for Common Trisomies in Low-Risk and Twin Pregnancies.

Authors:  Yanfei Xu; Pengzhen Jin; Yu Lei; Yeqing Qian; Yuqing Xu; Miaomiao Wang; Jinglei Jin; Yixuan Yin; Minyue Dong
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 4.599

10.  Inherited unbalanced reciprocal translocation with 3q duplication and 5p deletion in a foetus revealed by cell-free foetal DNA (cffDNA) testing: a case report.

Authors:  Taccyanna M Ali; Emilia Mateu-Brull; Nuria Balaguer; Camila Dantas; Haline Risso Borges; Mariana Quintans Guerra de Oliveira; Lorena Rodrigo; Inmaculada Campos-Galindo; Roser Navarro; Miguel Milán
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.175

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.