Tianhua Huang1, Shelley Dougan2, Mark Walker2, Christine M Armour2, Nan Okun2. 1. Ontario Prenatal Screening Program, Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario (Huang, Dougan, Walker, Armour, Okun), Ottawa, Ont.; Genetic Program (Huang), North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Regional Genetics Program (Armour), Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ont.; Maternal Fetal Medicine Program (Okun), Mt. Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. tianhua.huang@nygh.on.ca. 2. Ontario Prenatal Screening Program, Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario (Huang, Dougan, Walker, Armour, Okun), Ottawa, Ont.; Genetic Program (Huang), North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Regional Genetics Program (Armour), Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ont.; Maternal Fetal Medicine Program (Okun), Mt. Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In 2014, Ontario augmented its publicly funded multiple-marker screening program for prenatal aneuploidy by incorporating cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) analysis for high-risk pregnancies. We assessed trends in the use of multiple-marker screening, cffDNA screening and prenatal diagnostic testing before and after implementation of public funding. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive study based on data from the Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario. The study population included all pregnant women in Ontario with a singleton pregnancy and an expected date of delivery between July 1, 2012, and Mar. 31, 2016, with pregnancy data captured in BORN. Pregnancy losses and terminations before 20 weeks' gestation not captured in BORN were excluded. We generated descriptive statistics to show trends and regional variations in use. RESULTS: The study sample included 534 210 singleton pregnancies. After cffDNA screening was funded for specific indications, uptake of multiple-marker screening increased slightly, from 66.5% to 68.1% (p < 0.001). Uptake of cffDNA screening among women with a positive multiple-marker screening result increased substantially, from 3.2% to 48.8% (p < 0.001). In contrast, the rate of prenatal diagnostic testing in this group decreased from 54.8% to 30.8% (p < 0.001). Although women aged 40 years or older are eligible for primary cffDNA screening, only a small decrease in the use of multiple-marker screening was observed in this group. The greatest use of cffDNA screening and greatest decline in prenatal diagnostic testing were seen in women with a level of risk for trisomy 21 of 1:101-1:200 based on multiple-marker screening. INTERPRETATION: After public funding of cffDNA screening was implemented in Ontario, there was a significant increase in cffDNA screening and a significant decrease in prenatal diagnostic testing among women with a positive multiple-marker screening result. These changing patterns show the significant impact of public policy and funding decisions on women's choices regarding prenatal testing. Copyright 2018, Joule Inc. or its licensors.
BACKGROUND: In 2014, Ontario augmented its publicly funded multiple-marker screening program for prenatal aneuploidy by incorporating cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) analysis for high-risk pregnancies. We assessed trends in the use of multiple-marker screening, cffDNA screening and prenatal diagnostic testing before and after implementation of public funding. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive study based on data from the Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario. The study population included all pregnant women in Ontario with a singleton pregnancy and an expected date of delivery between July 1, 2012, and Mar. 31, 2016, with pregnancy data captured in BORN. Pregnancy losses and terminations before 20 weeks' gestation not captured in BORN were excluded. We generated descriptive statistics to show trends and regional variations in use. RESULTS: The study sample included 534 210 singleton pregnancies. After cffDNA screening was funded for specific indications, uptake of multiple-marker screening increased slightly, from 66.5% to 68.1% (p < 0.001). Uptake of cffDNA screening among women with a positive multiple-marker screening result increased substantially, from 3.2% to 48.8% (p < 0.001). In contrast, the rate of prenatal diagnostic testing in this group decreased from 54.8% to 30.8% (p < 0.001). Although women aged 40 years or older are eligible for primary cffDNA screening, only a small decrease in the use of multiple-marker screening was observed in this group. The greatest use of cffDNA screening and greatest decline in prenatal diagnostic testing were seen in women with a level of risk for trisomy 21 of 1:101-1:200 based on multiple-marker screening. INTERPRETATION: After public funding of cffDNA screening was implemented in Ontario, there was a significant increase in cffDNA screening and a significant decrease in prenatal diagnostic testing among women with a positive multiple-marker screening result. These changing patterns show the significant impact of public policy and funding decisions on women's choices regarding prenatal testing. Copyright 2018, Joule Inc. or its licensors.
Authors: Lyn S Chitty; David Wright; Melissa Hill; Talitha I Verhoef; Rebecca Daley; Celine Lewis; Sarah Mason; Fiona McKay; Lucy Jenkins; Abigail Howarth; Louise Cameron; Alec McEwan; Jane Fisher; Mark Kroese; Stephen Morris Journal: BMJ Date: 2016-07-04
Authors: Malgorzata Ilona Srebniak; Maarten F C M Knapen; Marieke Joosten; Karin E M Diderich; Sander Galjaard; Diane Van Opstal Journal: Mol Cytogenet Date: 2021-01-09 Impact factor: 2.009
Authors: Malia S Q Murphy; Deshayne B Fell; Ann E Sprague; Daniel J Corsi; Shelley Dougan; Sandra I Dunn; Vivian Holmberg; Tianhua Huang; Moya Johnson; Michael Kotuba; Lise Bisnaire; Pranesh Chakraborty; Susan Richardson; Mari Teitelbaum; Mark C Walker Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2021-11-10 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Karuna R M van der Meij; Caroline Kooij; Mireille N Bekker; Robert-Jan H Galjaard; Lidewij Henneman Journal: Prenat Diagn Date: 2021-09-14 Impact factor: 3.242