Literature DB >> 28515813

Transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy: Assessing complication risk in cases of previous abdominal surgery.

Simon Ouellet1, Robert Sabbagh1, Claudio Jeldres1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to assess the effect of previous abdominal surgery on perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing transperitoneal laparoscopic partial (LPN) or radical (LRN) nephrectomy for renal masses.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all cases of LPN and LRN for renal masses at our institution between 2008 and 2014. Patients were divided in two groups, those with and without prior abdominal surgery. Four perioperative outcomes were compared, namely, operative time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS), and 30-days complications rate. A subanalysis was performed to address the impact of previous open cholecystectomy on right LPN or LRN.
RESULTS: Of 293 patients identified, 146 (49.8%) had previous abdominal surgery. In univariate analysis, no differences in operative time (136 vs. 144 minutes; p=0.154), EBL (88 vs. 100 mL; p=0.211), or 30-day complication rate (24 vs. 14%; p=0.069) were recorded between the groups. Only LOS favoured patients without previous abdominal surgery (3 vs. 4 days; p=0.001). In multivariate analysis, prior abdominal surgery was not associated with an increased OT, EBL, LOS, or complication rate. The analysis of right nephrectomies showed increased OT (148 vs. 128 minutes; p=0.049) and complication rate (42 vs. 16%; p=0.004) for patients with past open cholecystectomy compared to those without. Multivariate analysis revealed that prior open cholecystectomy was associated with a longer LOS (ORmedian=2.7 [1.2-8.0]) and an increased risk of complications (ORmedian=4.5 [1.6-10.5]).
CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, previous abdominal surgery was not associated with worse perioperative outcomes after transperitoneal LPN and LRN for renal masses. However, previous open cholecystectomy resulted in a higher risk of complication and a longer LOS in patients undergoing right laparoscopic nephrectomy.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28515813      PMCID: PMC5434509          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.4107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  18 in total

1.  Transperitoneal laparoscopy into the previously operated abdomen: effect on operative time, length of stay and complications.

Authors:  Brian D Seifman; Rodney L Dunn; J Stuart Wolf
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Peritoneal adhesions and their relation to abdominal surgery. A postmortem study.

Authors:  M A Weibel; G Majno
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 3.  Peritoneal adhesions: etiology, pathophysiology, and clinical significance. Recent advances in prevention and management.

Authors:  T Liakakos; N Thomakos; P M Fine; C Dervenis; R L Young
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.588

4.  Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  H Ellis; B J Moran; J N Thompson; M C Parker; M S Wilson; D Menzies; A McGuire; A M Lower; R J Hawthorn; F O'Brien; S Buchan; A M Crowe
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-05-01       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Assessment of risk for intra-abdominal adhesions at laparoscopy for urological tumors.

Authors:  Stephen E Pautler; John L Phillips; McClellan M Walther
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Feasibility of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy after previous ipsilateral renal procedures.

Authors:  Burak Turna; Monish Aron; Rodrigo Frota; Mihir M Desai; Jihad Kaouk; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for clinical T1 renal masses: no impact of surgical approach on perioperative complications and long-term postoperative quality of life.

Authors:  Andreas Becker; Lea Pradel; Luis Kluth; Marianne Schmid; Christian Eichelberg; Sascha Ahyai; Quoc Trinh; Daniel Seiler; Roland Dahlem; Jens Hansen; Michael Rink; Mario Zacharias; Anja Mehnert; Corinna Bergelt; Margit Fisch; Felix K H Chun
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-05-31       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Comparison of the complications and the cost of open and laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in renal tumors larger than 7 centimeters.

Authors:  Omer Bayrak; Ilker Seckiner; Sakip Erturhan; Gokhan Cil; Ahmet Erbagci; Faruk Yagci
Journal:  Urol J       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 1.510

9.  Matched pair analysis of laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for the treatment of T3 renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  A Laird; K C C Choy; H Delaney; M L Cutress; K M O'Connor; D A Tolley; S A McNeill; G D Stewart; A C P Riddick
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Laparoscopic simple nephrectomy after previous ipsilateral open versus percutaneous renal surgery.

Authors:  Alireza Aminsharifi; Bahman Goshtasbi
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2012 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.