Literature DB >> 12441924

Assessment of risk for intra-abdominal adhesions at laparoscopy for urological tumors.

Stephen E Pautler1, John L Phillips, McClellan M Walther.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Abdominal wall adhesions at laparoscopy may predispose patients to access related injuries and increase the complexity of the procedure. We have observed concern from referring physicians regarding the safety of laparoscopy in patients who previously underwent surgery because of the risk of abdominal adhesions. To assess the risk of adhesions at laparoscopy a retrospective cohort study was performed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent a transperitoneal urological laparoscopic procedure in a 6-year period at our institution were included in this study. A chart review was performed to obtain demographic/surgical data and identify preoperative risk factors for adhesions, such as previous abdominal or pelvic surgery, radiation and/or intra-abdominal inflammatory disease. Operative videotapes were reviewed to determine the presence and location of adhesions. Standard statistical analyses were performed.
RESULTS: During the study period 127 patients underwent transperitoneal laparoscopy and videotapes on 82 (65%) were available for review. A total of 44 patients (54%) were identified with preoperative risk factors for adhesions (group 1), while 38 (46%) had no risk factors (group 2). The relative risk of adhesions was 1.34 (95% CI 0.89 to 2.01, p = 0.18) when risk factors were identified. There were no differences in the groups in patient age, operative time, access technique, conversion to open surgery or complications. Estimated blood loss was significantly higher in group 2, likely due to the preponderance of cytoreductive laparoscopic nephrectomy in this group.
CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the risk of intra-abdominal adhesions in patients with and without identifiable preoperative risk factors. Preoperative risk factors for adhesions should not contraindicate the transperitoneal laparoscopic approach for urological oncology procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12441924     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000035271.15152.b1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  6 in total

1.  Transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy: Assessing complication risk in cases of previous abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Simon Ouellet; Robert Sabbagh; Claudio Jeldres
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Feasibility and outcomes of laparoscopic renal intervention after prior open ipsilateral retroperitoneal surgery.

Authors:  Ronald S Boris; Gopal N Gupta; Jonas S Benson; W Marston Linehan; Peter A Pinto; Gennady Bratslavsky
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Laparoscopic simple nephrectomy after previous ipsilateral open versus percutaneous renal surgery.

Authors:  Alireza Aminsharifi; Bahman Goshtasbi
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2012 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

4.  Cameraless peritoneal entry in abdominal laparoscopy.

Authors:  William H Carlson; Griffeth Tully; Amit Rajguru; Dan R Burnett; Ricardo A Rendon
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2012 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

5.  Impact of previous abdominal surgery on robot-assisted radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Bertram E Yuh; Joseph Ciccone; Rameela Chandrasekhar; Zubair M Butt; Gregory E Wilding; Hyung L Kim; James L Mohler; Khurshid A Guru
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  Does previous abdominal surgery adversely affect perioperative and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic radical cystectomy?

Authors:  Xiaosong Wei; Jinjin Lu; Khurram Mutahir Siddiqui; Fan Li; Qianyuan Zhuang; Weimin Yang; Zhiquan Hu; Zhong Chen; Xiaodong Song; Shaogang Wang; Zhangqun Ye
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 2.754

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.