Literature DB >> 24879404

Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for clinical T1 renal masses: no impact of surgical approach on perioperative complications and long-term postoperative quality of life.

Andreas Becker1, Lea Pradel, Luis Kluth, Marianne Schmid, Christian Eichelberg, Sascha Ahyai, Quoc Trinh, Daniel Seiler, Roland Dahlem, Jens Hansen, Michael Rink, Mario Zacharias, Anja Mehnert, Corinna Bergelt, Margit Fisch, Felix K H Chun.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Beyond oncological safety, consideration of 30-day complications according to Clavien-Dindo, as well as postoperative quality of life (QoL) after nephron-sparing surgery for clinical T1 renal masses, represents important factors for treatment decision counseling. The objective of this study was to compare the effect of laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy (LPN vs. OPN) on 30-day complications and long-term postoperative QoL for clinical T1 renal masses.
METHODS: Retrospective, longitudinal analysis of 293 patients treated with either LPN versus OPN for T1 renal masses. The investigated endpoints were 30-day Clavien-Dindo complications and health-related QoL (EORTC QLQ-C30). Respectively, logistic and linear regression models analyzed the effect of surgical partial nephrectomy approach on endpoints.
RESULTS: Overall complication rates were similar in patients undergoing OPN or LPN (16.1 vs. 14.6 %, p = 0.8). Significantly less major complications (2.4 vs. 10.4 %, p = 0.025) occurred after LPN. Despite a shorter convalescence period for LPN patients (p = 0.035), in uni- and multivariable analyses, surgical approach was not associated with 30-day complications nor long-term differences in QoL (all p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite a faster recovery time after LPN, our findings suggest that LPN and OPN are equivalent with regard to 30-day Clavien-Dindo complication rates and long-term QoL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24879404     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-014-1318-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  25 in total

1.  Comprehensive assessment of quality of life and psychosocial adjustment in patients with renal tumors undergoing open, laparoscopic and nephron sparing surgery.

Authors:  Patricia A Parker; Richard Swartz; Bryan Fellman; Diana Urbauer; Yisheng Li; Louis L Pisters; Charles J Rosser; Christopher G Wood; Surena F Matin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

3.  Rates of open versus laparoscopic and partial versus radical nephrectomy for T1a renal cell carcinoma: a population-based evaluation.

Authors:  Marco Bianchi; Andreas Becker; Firas Abdollah; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Jens Hansen; Zhe Tian; Shahrokh F Shariat; Paul Perrotte; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Maxine Sun
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 3.369

4.  Quality of life and psychological adaptation after surgical treatment for localized renal cell carcinoma: impact of the amount of remaining renal tissue.

Authors:  P E Clark; L R Schover; R G Uzzo; K S Hafez; L A Rybicki; A C Novick
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Propensity-score matched comparison of complications, blood transfusions, length of stay, and in-hospital mortality between open and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a national series.

Authors:  M Sun; F Abdollah; S F Shariat; J Schmitges; Q-D Trinh; Z Tian; C Jeldres; A Abdo; M Bianchi; A Briganti; F Montorsi; P Perrotte; P I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 4.424

6.  Quality of life and perioperative outcomes after retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy (RN), open RN and nephron-sparing surgery in patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Christian Gratzke; Michael Seitz; Florian Bayrle; Boris Schlenker; Patrick J Bastian; Niko Haseke; Markus Bader; Derya Tilki; Alexander Roosen; Alexander Karl; Oliver Reich; Wael Y Khoder; Stephen Wyler; Christian G Stief; Michael Staehler; Alexander Bachmann
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors.

Authors:  Inderbir S Gill; Louis R Kavoussi; Brian R Lane; Michael L Blute; Denise Babineau; J Roberto Colombo; Igor Frank; Sompol Permpongkosol; Christopher J Weight; Jihad H Kaouk; Michael W Kattan; Andrew C Novick
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Health-related quality of life after hand-assisted laparoscopic and open radical nephrectomies of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jianping Jiang; Xiangyi Zheng; Jie Qin; Mingzhi Zheng; Qiqi Mao; Zhigen Zhang; Songliang Cai; Liping Xie
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  A comparative study of quality of life issues relating to open versus laparoscopic nephrectomy: a prospective pragmatic study.

Authors:  Ondina A Harryman; Kim Davenport; Stephen Keoghane; Francis X Keeley; Anthony G Timoney
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Quality of life after surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: comparison between radical nephrectomy and nephron-sparing surgery.

Authors:  Vassilis Poulakis; Ulrich Witzsch; Rachelle de Vries; Matthias Moeckel; Eduard Becht
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  9 in total

1.  Perioperative Morbidity of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Partial Nephrectomy: A Contemporary Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  Jorge Pereira; Joseph Renzulli; Gyan Pareek; Daniel Moreira; Ruiting Guo; Zheng Zhang; Ali Amin; Anthony Mega; Dragan Golijanin; Boris Gershman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  Initial experiences with the Hemopatch® as a hemostatic agent in zero-ischemia partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  F Imkamp; Y Tolkach; M Wolters; S Jutzi; M Kramer; T Herrmann
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Initial experience with a dual-console robotic-assisted platform for training in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  J C Bolger; M P Broe; M A Zarog; A Looney; K McKevitt; D Walsh; S Giri; C Peirce; J C Coffey
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy: Assessing complication risk in cases of previous abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Simon Ouellet; Robert Sabbagh; Claudio Jeldres
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Venous thromboembolism after nephrectomy: incidence, timing and associated risk factors from a national multi-institutional database.

Authors:  Brian J Jordan; Richard S Matulewicz; Brian Trihn; Shilajit Kundu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Multidetector CT imaging of complications after laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery.

Authors:  Massimo Tonolini; Anna Maria Ierardi; Virginia Varca; Giacomo Piero Incarbone; Marina Petullà; Roberto Bianco
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2015-06-24

7.  Urological procedures in Central Europe and the current reality based on the national registries of Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland (2012 status).

Authors:  Przemysław Adamczyk; Kajetan Juszczak; Tomasz Drewa; Milan Hora; Peter Nyirády; Marek Sosnowski
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2016-11-30

8.  Knotless retroperitoneoscopic nephron-sparing surgery for small renal masses: Comparison of bipolar sutureless technique and barbed suture technique.

Authors:  Jianfei Ye; Shudong Zhang; Xiaojun Tian; Guoliang Wang; Lei Zhao; Lulin Ma
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 1.671

9.  Laparoscopic Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Surgical, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes.

Authors:  Chengyu You; Yuelin Du; Hui Wang; Lei Peng; Tangqiang Wei; Xiaojun Zhang; Xianhui Li; Anguo Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 6.244

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.