Literature DB >> 11528133

Peritoneal adhesions: etiology, pathophysiology, and clinical significance. Recent advances in prevention and management.

T Liakakos1, N Thomakos, P M Fine, C Dervenis, R L Young.   

Abstract

AIM: To summarize the most common etiologic factors and describe the pathophysiology in the formation of peritoneal adhesions, to outline their clinical significance and consequences, and to evaluate the pharmacologic, mechanical, and surgical adjuvant strategies to minimize peritoneal adhesion formation.
METHODS: We performed an extensive MEDLINE search of the internationally published English literature of all medical and epidemiological journal articles, textbooks, scientific reports, and scientific journals from 1940 to 1997. We also reviewed reference lists in all the articles retrieved in the search as well as those of major texts regarding intraperitoneal postsurgical adhesion formation. All sources identified were reviewed with particular attention to risk factors, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, various methods, and innovative techniques for effectively and safely reducing the formation of postsurgical adhesions.
RESULTS: The formation of postoperative peritoneal adhesions is an important complication following gynecological and general abdominal surgery, leading to clinical and significant economical consequences. Adhesion occur in more than 90% of the patients following major abdominal surgery and in 55-100% of the women undergoing pelvic surgery. Small-bowel obstruction, infertility, chronic abdominal and pelvic pain, and difficult reoperative surgery are the most common consequences of peritoneal adhesions. Despite elaborate efforts to develop effective strategies to reduce or prevent adhesions, their formation remains a frequent occurrence after abdominal surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Until additional information and findings from future clinical investigations exist, only a meticulous surgical technique can be advocated in order to reduce unnecessary morbidity and mortality rates from these untoward effects of surgery. Copyright 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11528133     DOI: 10.1159/000050149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Surg        ISSN: 0253-4886            Impact factor:   2.588


  145 in total

Review 1.  Prevention of peritoneal adhesions: a promising role for gene therapy.

Authors:  Hussein M Atta
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Pathophysiology and prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesions.

Authors:  Willy Arung; Michel Meurisse; Olivier Detry
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Intra-abdominal adhesions: definition, origin, significance in surgical practice, and treatment options.

Authors:  Dörthe Brüggmann; Garri Tchartchian; Markus Wallwiener; Karsten Münstedt; Hans-Rudolf Tinneberg; Andreas Hackethal
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  The use of novel hemostatic sealant (Tisseel) in laparoscopic myomectomy: a case-control study.

Authors:  Roberto Angioli; Francesco Plotti; Roberto Ricciardi; Corrado Terranova; Marzio Angelo Zullo; Patrizio Damiani; Roberto Montera; Federica Guzzo; Giuseppe Scaletta; Ludovico Muzii
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Combined intraoperative administration of a histone deacetylase inhibitor and a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist synergistically reduces intra-abdominal adhesion formation in a rat model.

Authors:  Michael R Cassidy; Alan C Sherburne; Stanley J Heydrick; Arthur F Stucchi
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  The effect of opioids on the development of postoperative intra-abdominal adhesions.

Authors:  Amir Khorram-Manesh; Jalal Vahedian Ardakani; Hamid Reza Behjati; Gunnar Nylund; Dick Delbro
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy: Assessing complication risk in cases of previous abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Simon Ouellet; Robert Sabbagh; Claudio Jeldres
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Sodium hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane (Seprafilm) reduced early postoperative intestinal obstruction after lower abdominal surgery for colorectal cancer: the preliminary report.

Authors:  Chi-Min Park; Woo Yong Lee; Yong Beom Cho; Hae Ran Yun; Won-Suk Lee; Seong Hyeon Yun; Ho-Kyung Chun
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  All the commercially available adhesion barriers have the same effect on adhesion prophylaxis?; A comparison of barrier agents using a newly developed, severe intra-abdominal adhesion model.

Authors:  Hyo Jun Hwang; Min Sung An; Tae Kwun Ha; Kwang Hee Kim; Tae Hyeon Kim; Chang Soo Choi; Kwan Hee Hong; Soo Jin Jung; Sun-Hee Kim; Kuk Hwan Rho; Ki Beom Bae
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Practical limitations of bioresorbable membranes in the prevention of intra-abdominal adhesions.

Authors:  Rizal Lim; Jonathan M Morrill; Ryan C Lynch; Karen L Reed; Adam C Gower; Susan E Leeman; Arthur F Stucchi; James M Becker
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.