Literature DB >> 27893135

Screening for Colorectal Cancer and Evolving Issues for Physicians and Patients: A Review.

David Lieberman1, Uri Ladabaum2, Marcia Cruz-Correa3, Carla Ginsburg4, John M Inadomi5, Lawrence S Kim6, Francis M Giardiello7, Richard C Wender8.   

Abstract

Importance: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second-leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Screening can reduce CRC mortality and incidence, and numerous screening options, although available, complicate informed decision making. This review provides evidence-based tools for primary care physicians to identify patients with higher-than-average-risk and engage patients in informed decision making about CRC screening options. Observations: Recently, the US Preventive Services Task Force recommended any of 8 CRC screening approaches for average-risk individuals, beginning at age 50 years. Only 2 methods have been shown in randomized clinical trials to reduce mortality: fecal occult blood testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy. Of the 8 programs, screenings using the fecal immunochemical test annually and colonoscopy every 10 years are now the most commonly used tests in the United States and among the most effective in reducing CRC mortality as determined by decision models. With the exception of primary screening using colonoscopy, all of the other screening approaches have multiple steps. Adherence to each phase of a multistep program is critical to achieving maximal effectiveness of the screening program. It is likely that each of the recommended programs can reduce CRC mortality, but other key outcomes may differ such as lifetime burden of colonoscopy, complications, patient acceptance, and cost. Decisions about the timing of screening cessation should be individualized. Conclusions and Relevance: CRC screening is effective if patients adhere to the steps in each screening program. There is no evidence that one program is superior to another. Informed decision-making tools are provided to assist patients and clinicians with the goal of improving adherence to effective screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27893135     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.17418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  27 in total

1.  Sessile Serrated Polyps and Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Seth D Crockett
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Cancer diagnostics: current concepts and future perspectives.

Authors:  Martina Montagnana; Giuseppe Lippi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-07

3.  Geographic and population-level disparities in colorectal cancer testing: A multilevel analysis of Medicaid and commercial claims data.

Authors:  Melinda M Davis; Stephanie Renfro; Robyn Pham; Kristen Hassmiller Lich; Jackilen Shannon; Gloria D Coronado; Stephanie B Wheeler
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Effect of Physician Notification Regarding Nonadherence to Colorectal Cancer Screening on Patient Participation in Fecal Immunochemical Test Cancer Screening: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Cédric Rat; Corinne Pogu; Delphine Le Donné; Chloé Latour; Gaelle Bianco; France Nanin; Anne Cowppli-Bony; Aurélie Gaultier; Jean-Michel Nguyen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Clear colonoscopy as a surveillance tool in the prediction and reduction of advanced neoplasms: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Qisheng Zhang; Yucui Shen; Jianhua Xu; Peng Gao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Open Access Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Prevention: An Evaluation of Appropriateness and Quality.

Authors:  Nikhil Kapila; Harjinder Singh; Kiranmayee Kandragunta; Fernando J Castro
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  The compliance rate for the second diagnostic evaluation after a positive fecal occult blood test: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rachel Gingold-Belfer; Haim Leibovitzh; Doron Boltin; Nidal Issa; Tsachi Tsadok Perets; Ram Dickman; Yaron Niv
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 8.  FOXO1: Another avenue for treating digestive malignancy?

Authors:  Feiyu Shi; Tian Li; Zhi Liu; Kai Qu; Chengxin Shi; Yaguang Li; Qian Qin; Liang Cheng; Xin Jin; Tianyu Yu; Wencheng Di; Jianwen Que; Hongping Xia; Junjun She
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 15.707

9.  Assessing Individual Risk for High-Risk Early Colorectal Neoplasm for Pre-Selection of Screening in Shanghai, China: A Population-Based Nested Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Jie Shen; Yiling Wu; Xiaoshuang Feng; Fei Liang; Miao Mo; Binxin Cai; Changming Zhou; Zezhou Wang; Meiying Zhu; Guoxiang Cai; Ying Zheng
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.989

10.  Cost-utility of colorectal cancer screening at 40 years old for average-risk patients.

Authors:  Nilofer S Azad; Ira L Leeds; Waruguru Wanjau; Eun J Shin; William V Padula
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 4.018

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.