BACKGROUND: Up to 60% of individuals with moderate to severe chronic hemiparetic stroke experience excessive involuntary wrist/finger flexion that constrains functional hand movements including hand opening. It's not known how stroke-induced brain injury impacts volitional hand opening and grasping forces as a result of the expression of abnormal coupling between shoulder abduction and wrist/finger flexion or the flexion synergy. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study is to understand how shoulder abduction loading affects volitional hand opening and grasping forces in individuals with moderate to severe chronic hemiparetic stroke. METHODS: Thirty-six individuals (stroke, 26; control, 10) were recruited for this study. Each participant was instructed to perform maximal hand opening and grasping forces while the arm was either fully supported or lifted with a weight equal to 25% or 50% of the participant's maximal shoulder abduction torque. Hand pentagon area, defined as the area formed by the tips of thumb and fingers, was calculated during hand opening. Forces were recorded during grasping. RESULTS: In individuals with moderate stroke, increasing shoulder abduction loading reduced the ability to maximally open the hand. In individuals with severe stroke, who were not able to open the hand, grasping forces were generated and increased with shoulder abduction loading. Stroke individuals also showed a reduced ability to control volitional grasping forces due to the enhanced expression of flexion synergy. CONCLUSIONS: Shoulder abduction loading reduced the ability to volitionally open the hand and control grasping forces after stroke. Neural mechanisms and clinical implications of these findings are discussed.
BACKGROUND: Up to 60% of individuals with moderate to severe chronic hemiparetic stroke experience excessive involuntary wrist/finger flexion that constrains functional hand movements including hand opening. It's not known how stroke-induced brain injury impacts volitional hand opening and grasping forces as a result of the expression of abnormal coupling between shoulder abduction and wrist/finger flexion or the flexion synergy. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study is to understand how shoulder abduction loading affects volitional hand opening and grasping forces in individuals with moderate to severe chronic hemiparetic stroke. METHODS: Thirty-six individuals (stroke, 26; control, 10) were recruited for this study. Each participant was instructed to perform maximal hand opening and grasping forces while the arm was either fully supported or lifted with a weight equal to 25% or 50% of the participant's maximal shoulder abduction torque. Hand pentagon area, defined as the area formed by the tips of thumb and fingers, was calculated during hand opening. Forces were recorded during grasping. RESULTS: In individuals with moderate stroke, increasing shoulder abduction loading reduced the ability to maximally open the hand. In individuals with severe stroke, who were not able to open the hand, grasping forces were generated and increased with shoulder abduction loading. Stroke individuals also showed a reduced ability to control volitional grasping forces due to the enhanced expression of flexion synergy. CONCLUSIONS: Shoulder abduction loading reduced the ability to volitionally open the hand and control grasping forces after stroke. Neural mechanisms and clinical implications of these findings are discussed.
Entities:
Keywords:
flexion synergy; grasping forces; hand opening; loss of independent joint control; motor control; muscle coactivation; paretic hand dysfunction; reticulospinal tract; shoulder abduction; stroke rehabilitation
Authors: Máximo Zimerman; Kirstin F Heise; Julia Hoppe; Leonardo G Cohen; Christian Gerloff; Friedhelm C Hummel Journal: Stroke Date: 2012-05-22 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: G Alagona; V Delvaux; P Gérard; V De Pasqua; G Pennisi; P J Delwaide; F Nicoletti; A Maertens de Noordhout Journal: Stroke Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: C Gowland; P Stratford; M Ward; J Moreland; W Torresin; S Van Hullenaar; J Sanford; S Barreca; B Vanspall; N Plews Journal: Stroke Date: 1993-01 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Naveed Ejaz; Jing Xu; Meret Branscheidt; Benjamin Hertler; Heidi Schambra; Mario Widmer; Andreia V Faria; Michelle D Harran; Juan C Cortes; Nathan Kim; Pablo A Celnik; Tomoko Kitago; Andreas R Luft; John W Krakauer; Jörn Diedrichsen Journal: Brain Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Keith D Runnalls; Pablo Ortega-Auriol; Angus J C McMorland; Greg Anson; Winston D Byblow Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2019-11-14 Impact factor: 1.972
Authors: Jacob G McPherson; Albert Chen; Michael D Ellis; Jun Yao; C J Heckman; Julius P A Dewald Journal: J Physiol Date: 2018-02-19 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Shashwati Geed; Megan Grainger; Michelle L Harris-Love; Peter S Lum; Alexander W Dromerick Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2021-03-09 Impact factor: 1.972
Authors: Kevin B Wilkins; Meriel Owen; Carson Ingo; Carolina Carmona; Julius P A Dewald; Jun Yao Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2017-06-14 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Kevin B Wilkins; Jun Yao; Meriel Owen; Haleh Karbasforoushan; Carolina Carmona; Julius P A Dewald Journal: J Physiol Date: 2020-04-26 Impact factor: 6.228
Authors: Amy N Adkins; Julius P A Dewald; Lindsay P Garmirian; Christa M Nelson; Wendy M Murray Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2021-06-29 Impact factor: 12.779