Laura Miller McPherson1, Julius P A Dewald2. 1. Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, McCormick School of Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA; Department of Physical Therapy, Nicole Wertheim College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering and Computing, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA. 2. Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, McCormick School of Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA. Electronic address: j-dewald@northwestern.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The flexion and extension synergies were quantified at the paretic elbow, forearm, wrist, and finger joints within the same group of participants for the first time. Differences in synergy expression at each of the four joints were examined, as were the ways these differences varied across the joints. METHODS: Twelve post-stroke individuals with chronic moderate-to-severe hemiparesis and six age-matched controls participated. Participants generated isometric shoulder abduction (SABD) and shoulder adduction (SADD) at four submaximal levels to progressively elicit the flexion and extension synergies, respectively. Isometric joint torques and EMG were recorded from shoulder, elbow, forearm (radio-ulnar), wrist, and finger joints and muscles. RESULTS: SABD elicited strong wrist and finger flexion torque that increased with shoulder torque level. SADD produced primarily wrist and finger flexion torque, but magnitudes at the wrist were less than during SABD. Findings contrasted with those at the elbow and forearm, where torques and EMG generated due to SABD and SADD were opposite in direction. CONCLUSIONS: Flexion and extension synergy expression are more similar at the hand than at the shoulder and elbow. Specific bulbospinal pathways that may underlie flexion and extension synergy expression are discussed. SIGNIFICANCE: Whole-limb behavior must be considered when examining paretic hand function in moderately-to-severely impaired individuals.
OBJECTIVE: The flexion and extension synergies were quantified at the paretic elbow, forearm, wrist, and finger joints within the same group of participants for the first time. Differences in synergy expression at each of the four joints were examined, as were the ways these differences varied across the joints. METHODS: Twelve post-stroke individuals with chronic moderate-to-severe hemiparesis and six age-matched controls participated. Participants generated isometric shoulder abduction (SABD) and shoulder adduction (SADD) at four submaximal levels to progressively elicit the flexion and extension synergies, respectively. Isometric joint torques and EMG were recorded from shoulder, elbow, forearm (radio-ulnar), wrist, and finger joints and muscles. RESULTS:SABD elicited strong wrist and finger flexion torque that increased with shoulder torque level. SADD produced primarily wrist and finger flexion torque, but magnitudes at the wrist were less than during SABD. Findings contrasted with those at the elbow and forearm, where torques and EMG generated due to SABD and SADD were opposite in direction. CONCLUSIONS: Flexion and extension synergy expression are more similar at the hand than at the shoulder and elbow. Specific bulbospinal pathways that may underlie flexion and extension synergy expression are discussed. SIGNIFICANCE: Whole-limb behavior must be considered when examining paretic hand function in moderately-to-severely impaired individuals.
Authors: Jacob G McPherson; Albert Chen; Michael D Ellis; Jun Yao; C J Heckman; Julius P A Dewald Journal: J Physiol Date: 2018-02-19 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Shashwati Geed; Megan Grainger; Michelle L Harris-Love; Peter S Lum; Alexander W Dromerick Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2021-03-09 Impact factor: 1.972
Authors: M Saes; M I Mohamed Refai; B J F van Beijnum; J B J Bussmann; E P Jansma; P H Veltink; J H Buurke; E E H van Wegen; C G M Meskers; J W Krakauer; G Kwakkel Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2022-01-31 Impact factor: 3.919