Literature DB >> 31728596

Effects of arm weight support on neuromuscular activation during reaching in chronic stroke patients.

Keith D Runnalls1,2, Pablo Ortega-Auriol1,2, Angus J C McMorland1,2,3, Greg Anson1,2, Winston D Byblow4,5.   

Abstract

To better understand how arm weight support (WS) can be used to alleviate upper limb impairment after stroke, we investigated the effects of WS on muscle activity, muscle synergy expression, and corticomotor excitability (CME) in 13 chronic stroke patients and 6 age-similar healthy controls. For patients, lesion location and corticospinal tract integrity were assessed using magnetic resonance imaging. Upper limb impairment was assessed using the Fugl-Meyer upper extremity assessment with patients categorised as either mild or moderate-severe. Three levels of WS were examined: low = 0, medium = 50 and high = 100% of full support. Surface EMG was recorded from 8 upper limb muscles, and muscle synergies were decomposed using non-negative matrix factorisation from data obtained during reaching movements to an array of 14 targets using the paretic or dominant arm. Interactions between impairment level and WS were found for the number of targets hit, and EMG measures. Overall, greater WS resulted in lower EMG levels, although the degree of modulation between WS levels was less for patients with moderate-severe compared to mild impairment. Healthy controls expressed more synergies than patients with moderate-severe impairment. Healthy controls and patients with mild impairment showed more synergies with high compared to low weight support. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to elicit motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) to which stimulus-response curves were fitted as a measure of corticomotor excitability (CME). The effect of WS on CME varied between muscles and across impairment level. These preliminary findings demonstrate that WS has direct and indirect effects on muscle activity, synergies, and CME and warrants further study in order to reduce upper limb impairment after stroke.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Human; Muscle synergy; Reaching; Stroke; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Upper limb

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31728596     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-019-05687-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  70 in total

1.  Input-output properties and gain changes in the human corticospinal pathway.

Authors:  H Devanne; B A Lavoie; C Capaday
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Role of spinal premotoneurones in mediating corticospinal input to forearm motoneurones in man.

Authors:  V Pauvert; E Pierrot-Deseilligny; J C Rothwell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1998-04-01       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Flexion synergy overshadows flexor spasticity during reaching in chronic moderate to severe hemiparetic stroke.

Authors:  Michael D Ellis; Ingrid Schut; Julius P A Dewald
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  The relation between impairments and functional outcomes poststroke.

Authors:  A T Patel; P W Duncan; S M Lai; S Studenski
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  Merging of healthy motor modules predicts reduced locomotor performance and muscle coordination complexity post-stroke.

Authors:  David J Clark; Lena H Ting; Felix E Zajac; Richard R Neptune; Steven A Kautz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Alterations in upper limb muscle synergy structure in chronic stroke survivors.

Authors:  Jinsook Roh; William Z Rymer; Eric J Perreault; Seng Bum Yoo; Randall F Beer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Posture-related modulations in motor cortical excitability of the proximal and distal arm muscles.

Authors:  Shailesh S Kantak; George F Wittenberg; Wan-Wen Liao; Laurence S Magder; Mark W Rogers; Sandy McCombe Waller
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Observation of amounts of movement practice provided during stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Catherine E Lang; Jillian R Macdonald; Darcy S Reisman; Lara Boyd; Teresa Jacobson Kimberley; Sheila M Schindler-Ivens; T George Hornby; Sandy A Ross; Patricia L Scheets
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Recent trends in robot-assisted therapy environments to improve real-life functional performance after stroke.

Authors:  Michelle J Johnson
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Brainstem and spinal cord MRI identifies altered sensorimotor pathways post-stroke.

Authors:  Haleh Karbasforoushan; Julien Cohen-Adad; Julius P A Dewald
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  5 in total

1.  Providing unloading by exoskeleton improves shoulder flexion performance after stroke.

Authors:  Bonnie Perry; Jenn Sivak; Dobrivoje Stokic
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The reserve of joint torque determines movement coordination.

Authors:  Germain Faity; Denis Mottet; Simon Pla; Jérôme Froger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Human Weight Compensation With a Backdrivable Upper-Limb Exoskeleton: Identification and Control.

Authors:  Dorian Verdel; Simon Bastide; Nicolas Vignais; Olivier Bruneau; Bastien Berret
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-01-13

4.  Alterations in intermuscular coordination underlying isokinetic exercise after a stroke and their implications on neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Jeong-Ho Park; Joon-Ho Shin; Hangil Lee; Jinsook Roh; Hyung-Soon Park
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 4.262

5.  The Strength of the Corticospinal Tract Not the Reticulospinal Tract Determines Upper-Limb Impairment Level and Capacity for Skill-Acquisition in the Sub-Acute Post-Stroke Period.

Authors:  Ulrike Hammerbeck; Sarah F Tyson; Prawin Samraj; Kristen Hollands; John W Krakauer; John Rothwell
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2021-07-04       Impact factor: 3.919

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.