Literature DB >> 28504942

Interaction of Perceived Frequency and Intensity in Fingertip Electrotactile Stimulation: Dissimilarity Ratings and Multidimensional Scaling.

Kurt A Kaczmarek, Mitchell E Tyler, Uchechukwu O Okpara, Steven J Haase.   

Abstract

Sensations elicited by electrical stimulation of touch are multidimensional, varying in perceived intensity and quality in response to changes in stimulus current or waveform timing. This paper manipulated both current and frequency, while volunteer participants estimated the dissimilarity of all non-identical pairs of 16 stimulus conditions. Multidimensional scaling analysis revealed that a model having two perceptual dimensions was adequate in representing the electrotactile (electrocutaneous) sensations. The two dimensions were identified as perceptual frequency and intensity, and were strongly correlated with the two stimulus variables, frequency and current, although not in a 1:1 correspondence. Perception of frequency differences increased monotonically with stimulus intensity, which is consistent with other human sensory systems, such as hearing and vision. Our results are consistent with previously-reported research using a different methodology and cutaneous locus. Congruence across different methods and laboratories suggests similar underlying perceptual mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28504942      PMCID: PMC5681405          DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2017.2702628

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng        ISSN: 1534-4320            Impact factor:   3.802


  20 in total

1.  Perceptual dimensions of tactile textures.

Authors:  Delphine Picard; Catherine Dacremont; Dominique Valentin; Agnès Giboreau
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2003-10

2.  Maximal dynamic range electrotactile stimulation waveforms.

Authors:  K A Kaczmarek; J G Webster; R G Radwin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Electric pulse frequency and magnitude of perceived sensation during electrocutaneous forearm stimulation.

Authors:  Herbert F Jelinek; Rowan McIntyre
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  Electrotactile and vibrotactile displays for sensory substitution systems.

Authors:  K A Kaczmarek; J G Webster; P Bach-y-Rita; W J Tompkins
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Contours of equal perceived amplitude and equal perceived frequency for electrocutaneous stimuli.

Authors:  C L Van Doren
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1997-05

6.  Sensory correlates of somatic afferent fibre activation.

Authors:  H E Torebjörk; W Schady; J Ochoa
Journal:  Hum Neurobiol       Date:  1984

7.  Relationship between pulse rate and pulse width for a constant-intensity level of electrocutaneous stimulation.

Authors:  A Y Szeto
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  The perceptual properties of electrocutaneous stimulation: sensory quality, subjective intensity, and intensity-duration relation.

Authors:  T Tashiro; A Higashiyama
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-12

9.  Electrocutaneous pulse rate and pulse width psychometric functions for sensory communications.

Authors:  A Y Szeto; J Lyman; R E Prior
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 2.888

10.  Efficacy of electrotactile vestibular substitution in patients with peripheral and central vestibular loss.

Authors:  Y P Danilov; M E Tyler; K L Skinner; R A Hogle; P Bach-y-Rita
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.435

View more
  2 in total

1.  Non-linearity of Skin Properties in Electrotactile Applications: Identification and Mitigation.

Authors:  Mehdi Rahimi; Fang Jiang; Yantao Shen
Journal:  IEEE Access       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 3.367

2.  Electrically-Evoked Proximity Sensation Can Enhance Fine Finger Control in Telerobotic Pinch.

Authors:  Ziqi Zhao; Minku Yeo; Stefan Manoharan; Seok Chang Ryu; Hangue Park
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.