Literature DB >> 2026426

Electrotactile and vibrotactile displays for sensory substitution systems.

K A Kaczmarek1, J G Webster, P Bach-y-Rita, W J Tompkins.   

Abstract

Sensory substitution systems provide their users with environmental information through a human sensory channel (eye, ear, or skin) different from that normally used, or with the information processed in some useful way. We review the methods used to present visual, auditory, and modified tactile information to the skin. First, we discuss present and potential future applications of sensory substitution, including tactile vision substitution (TVS), tactile auditory substitution, and remote tactile sensing or feedback (teletouch). Next, we review the relevant sensory physiology of the skin, including both the mechanisms of normal touch and the mechanisms and sensations associated with electrical stimulation of the skin using surface electrodes (electrotactile (also called electrocutaneous) stimulation). We briefly summarize the information-processing ability of the tactile sense and its relevance to sensory substitution. Finally, we discuss the limitations of current tactile display technologies and suggest areas requiring further research for sensory substitution systems to become more practical.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2026426     DOI: 10.1109/10.68204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  88 in total

1.  Power requirements for vibrotactile piezo-electric and electromechanical transducers.

Authors:  C A Perez; A J Santibañez; C A Holzmann; P A Estévez; C M Held
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Optimization of single electrode tactile codes.

Authors:  A Y Szeto; G R Farrenkopf
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Effects of sensory augmentation on postural control and gait symmetry of transfemoral amputees: a case description.

Authors:  Anna Pagel; Alejandro Hernandez Arieta; Robert Riener; Heike Vallery
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Electrotactile perception of scatterplots on the fingertips and abdomen.

Authors:  S J Haase; K A Kaczmarek
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Evaluation and comparison of 50 Hz current threshold of electrocutaneous sensations using different methods.

Authors:  G Lindenblatt; J Silny
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.066

6.  Skin impedance measurements using simple and compound electrodes.

Authors:  E J Woo; P Hua; J G Webster; W J Tompkins; R Pallás-Areny
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Guidance of visual direction by topographical vibrotactile cues on the torso.

Authors:  Francois Asseman; Adolfo M Bronstein; Michael A Gresty
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Sensory adaptation to electrical stimulation of the somatosensory nerves.

Authors:  Emily L Graczyk; Benoit P Delhaye; Matthew A Schiefer; Sliman J Bensmaia; Dustin J Tyler
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 9.  Neural interface technology for rehabilitation: exploiting and promoting neuroplasticity.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Jennifer L Collinger; Monica A Perez; Elizabeth C Tyler-Kabara; Leonardo G Cohen; Niels Birbaumer; Steven W Brose; Andrew B Schwartz; Michael L Boninger; Douglas J Weber
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.784

10.  Evoked Haptic Sensation in the Hand With Concurrent Non-Invasive Nerve Stimulation.

Authors:  Luis Vargas; Graham Whitehouse; He Huang; Yong Zhu; Xiaogang Hu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 4.538

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.