Literature DB >> 18413905

Efficacy of electrotactile vestibular substitution in patients with peripheral and central vestibular loss.

Y P Danilov1, M E Tyler, K L Skinner, R A Hogle, P Bach-y-Rita.   

Abstract

Vestibular dysfunction of either central or peripheral origin can significantly affect balance, posture, and gait. We conducted a pilot study to test the effectiveness of training with the BrainPort balance device in subjects with a balance dysfunction due to peripheral or central vestibular loss. The BrainPort balance device transmits information about the patient's head position via electrotactile stimulation of the tongue. Head position data is sensed by an accelerometer and displayed on the tongue as a pattern of stimulation. This pattern of stimulation moves forward, backward, and laterally on the tongue in direct response to head movements. Users of the device were trained to use this stimulation to adjust their position in order to maintain their balance. Twenty-eight subjects with peripheral or central vestibular loss were trained with the BrainPort balance device and tested using the following standardized quantitative measurements of the treatment effects: Computerized Dynamic Posturography (CDP) using the Sensory Organization Test (SOT), Dynamic Gait Index (DGI), Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC), and Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI). All subjects had chronic balance problems and all but one had previously participated in vestibular rehabilitation therapy. The scores on the clinical tests upon entry into the study were compared to their scores following training with the BrainPort balance device. Our results exhibit consistent positive and statistically significant improvements in balance, posture and gait. These results exceed what could normally be achieved in three to five days of traditional balance training alone. Since this was not a controlled study, we are unable to distinguish the degree to which these improvements are attributable to training with the BrainPort balance device versus the balance exercises performed by all subjects as a part of the BrainPort training sessions. Nonetheless, after training with the BrainPort balance device, all subjects demonstrated significant improvements in performance beyond what might be expected from conventional vestibular rehabilitation therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18413905      PMCID: PMC2577218     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vestib Res        ISSN: 0957-4271            Impact factor:   2.435


  15 in total

1.  The dynamic gait index relates to self-reported fall history in individuals with vestibular dysfunction.

Authors:  S L Whitney; M T Hudak; G F Marchetti
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.435

Review 2.  Multimodal and motor influences on orientation: implications for adapting to weightless and virtual environments.

Authors:  J R Lackner
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.435

3.  Maximal dynamic range electrotactile stimulation waveforms.

Authors:  K A Kaczmarek; J G Webster; R G Radwin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Closing an open-loop control system: vestibular substitution through the tongue.

Authors:  Mitchell Tyler; Yuri Danilov; Paul Bach-Y-Rita
Journal:  J Integr Neurosci       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 5.  Emerging concepts of brain function.

Authors:  Paul Bach-Y-Rita
Journal:  J Integr Neurosci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Position and velocity coupling of postural sway to somatosensory drive.

Authors:  J Jeka; K Oie; G Schöner; T Dijkstra; E Henson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  The development of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory.

Authors:  G P Jacobson; C W Newman
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1990-04

8.  The Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale.

Authors:  L E Powell; A M Myers
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 6.053

9.  Somatosensory loss increases vestibulospinal sensitivity.

Authors:  F B Horak; F Hlavacka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Posturography changes do not predict functional performance changes.

Authors:  D E O'Neill; K M Gill-Body; D E Krebs
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1998-11
View more
  24 in total

1.  Electrical tongue stimulation normalizes activity within the motion-sensitive brain network in balance-impaired subjects as revealed by group independent component analysis.

Authors:  Joseph C Wildenberg; Mitchell E Tyler; Yuri P Danilov; Kurt A Kaczmarek; Mary E Meyerand
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2011-09-12

2.  Sustained cortical and subcortical neuromodulation induced by electrical tongue stimulation.

Authors:  Joseph C Wildenberg; Mitchell E Tyler; Yuri P Danilov; Kurt A Kaczmarek; Mary E Meyerand
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.978

3.  High-resolution fMRI detects neuromodulation of individual brainstem nuclei by electrical tongue stimulation in balance-impaired individuals.

Authors:  Joseph C Wildenberg; Mitchell E Tyler; Yuri P Danilov; Kurt A Kaczmarek; Mary E Meyerand
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  One step closer to a functional vestibular prosthesis.

Authors:  Chris J Dakin; L Caitlin Elmore; Ari Rosenberg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  [Modern rehabilitation for vestibular disorders using neurofeedback training procedures].

Authors:  D Basta; A Ernst
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Interaction of Perceived Frequency and Intensity in Fingertip Electrotactile Stimulation: Dissimilarity Ratings and Multidimensional Scaling.

Authors:  Kurt A Kaczmarek; Mitchell E Tyler; Uchechukwu O Okpara; Steven J Haase
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.802

7.  The Use of Vibrotactile Feedback During Dual-Task Standing Balance Conditions in People With Unilateral Vestibular Hypofunction.

Authors:  Chia-Cheng Lin; Susan L Whitney; Patrick J Loughlin; Joseph M Furman; Mark S Redfern; Kathleen H Sienko; Patrick J Sparto
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 8.  Electrical stimulation of cranial nerves in cognition and disease.

Authors:  Devin Adair; Dennis Truong; Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Nigel Gebodh; Helen Borges; Libby Ho; J Douglas Bremner; Bashar W Badran; Vitaly Napadow; Vincent P Clark; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-02-23       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  Electrotactile stimulation on the tongue: Intensity perception, discrimination, and cross-modality estimation.

Authors:  Cecil A Lozano; Kurt A Kaczmarek; Marco Santello
Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.111

10.  Altered connectivity of the balance processing network after tongue stimulation in balance-impaired individuals.

Authors:  Joe C Wildenberg; Mitchell E Tyler; Yuri P Danilov; Kurt A Kaczmarek; Mary E Meyerand
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2013
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.